A Flip-Flop Of Epic Proportions On Safe Outdoor Spaces; Tents For Victims Of Sex Trafficking Inhumane; September 28 Hearing Scheduled For 7 Appeals Of  “Safe Outdoor Space” For Sex Trafficking Victims

On September 7, the Albuquerque City Council  voted “NO” to override Democrat Mayor Tim Keller’s veto of a one-year moratorium on the application process for “Safe Outdoor Spaces”.   In order to override the veto, 6 YES votes were needed.  The 4 who voted NO to override were Republican Trudy Jones who joined Democrats Isaac Benton, Pat Davis and Tammy Fiebelcorn.  The 5 who voted YES to override the veto. Were Republicans Brook Bassam, Renee Grout, and Dan Lewis who were joined by Democrats Klarissa Peña and Louie Sanchez.

“Safe Outdoor Space” is a lot, or a portion of a lot, developed to provide designated spaces for occupancy by tents, recreational vehicles, and/or light vehicles. Designated spaces are provided to occupants at no charge. A safe outdoor space offers social services and support facilities.  The Integrated Development Ordinance (IDO) limits Safe Outdoor Space camps to 40 spots and a total of 50 residents each and makes them a temporary use where operators can run them for two years at a selected sites with the possibility of a single two-year extension.

https://www.cabq.gov/family/services/homeless-services/about-homeless-services#encampments

On September 12, the on-line news agency New Mexico Sun published the following editorial commentary written by Bob Reuel:

HEADLINE:  Councilor Trudy Jones homeless tent camps: Flip-flop of epic proportions

It is extremely disappointing and disheartening, when our City of Albuquerque Councilors are not responding to the will of their constituents. I live in District 8 represented by my Councilor Trudy Jones, and she epically flip-flopped on her vote for the Safe Outdoor Spaces – Homeless Tent Encampments (SOS), three times in a matter of weeks. 

How is this possible? 

This SOS policy is deeply flawed in a number of ways, with homeless tent camps scheduled to be installed next to neighborhoods and in the epicenter of our most fragile business districts, for which I and many others, reached out to Councilor Jones to oppose. 

It is most certain that our citizenry favors taking care of our homeless population in a thoughtful and planned out manner, but let’s be honest, it cannot be at the expense of our personal safety or economic security, which the SOS clearly violates. Councilor Jones should be fully aware of her constituent’s opposition to the SOS, particularly if she read the most recent Citizens Perception Survey, that indicates only 9% of respondents believe the City is doing a good job with the homeless. 

If Councilor Jones was truly committed to the mandates of her constituents, she would have been steadfast in her position to not only oppose the original SOS resolution that she voted for, but also to override the Mayor’s veto of the one-year Moratorium for the SOS, that she voted against. 

To put this into perspective, Councilor Jones voted for the original resolution to allow SOS homeless tent encampments to be peppered in and around our City at two encampments per district with 50 occupants per camp. I live in the far northeast heights and would like to know where Councilor Jones intends to approve the importation of 100 additional homeless occupants, injected into our neighborhoods, which will exacerbate an already critical mass of homeless that now disrupt, corrupt and destroy the property and wellbeing of law-abiding citizens. 

How is it that an issue as sensitive to the health and safety of our neighborhoods, economic viability of our businesses and survivability of our City, is being played off like a political football? Councilor Jones first voted Yes on the original SOS resolution, but due to the backlash from voters, saw the light and voted Yes for a one-year Moratorium of the SOS, to allow policy makers time to reexamine the impacts of the SOS in more detail. Without notice of her intentions and without regard for her constituents, Councilor Jones then flipped her vote again, to allow the mayor’s veto to stand for the dissolution of the one-year Moratorium, which now delivers the green light for the SOS encampments to move forward. This is nothing short of a quid-pro-quo between Councilors and the Mayor, whereby deals are cut behind closed doors and transparency of our policy makers is completely sealed off from public view. 

I implore Councilor Jones and all other Councilors, to not only listen to the objections of their constituents to this most egregious SOS policy, but also respond to the will and mandates of their constituents,  and vote down any future SOS actions meant to facilitate Homeless Tent Encampments, and keep our neighborhoods and business districts safe and viable.

Bob Reule, a lifetime resident of Albuquerque for 68 years, resides in the NE heights. He attended Eubank and Mitchell Elementary, Madison Jr High, Sandia High School and UNM. Bob owns and operates a family-owned local business since 1958.

The link to the New Mexico Sun article is here:

https://newmexicosun.com/stories/631603067-councilor-trudy-jones-homeless-tent-camps-flip-flop-of-epic-proportions

HEARING SCHEDULED FOR SEVEN APPEALS ON SOS FOR “VICTIMS OF SEX TRAFFICKING”

On August 8, the City Planning Department approved the Dawn Legacy Point application for a Safe Outdoor Space homeless campsite at 1250 Menaul, NE which will be used by woman who have been “victims of sex trafficking”.   The City Planning Department unilaterally reviewed the application behind closed doors with no notice to surrounding businesses or neighborhood associations, no public hearing and no public input. The application was “fast tracked” by the Planning Department to approve the application just 8 days before the City Council was scheduled to repeal the Safe Outdoor Spaces zoning use on August 16.

Less than a half mile from the vacant land and within walking distance from the property is Menaul School, a private boarding school for 6th to 12th graders. Directly across the street from the property is the T-Mobile Call Center and a Quality Inn & Suites. Going West on Menaul and one block from the property is Carrington College and two apartment complexes. Immediately East of the Freeway is the massive TA Travel Truck Stop on University that can accommodate parking of upwards of 150 semitrucks. Within law enforcement circles, the truck stop is known for prostitution and illicit drug activity. Immediate south of the truck stop on University Blvd is the Crown Plaza Hotel.

The vacant land borders Sunset Memorial Park to the West. It has been reported that workers daily patrol the cemetery grounds, monitoring the activity of homeless people who have taken to lounging in the various meditative shelters provided for grieving families. The homeless are known to use the various fountains throughout the park to wash themselves or use the fountains as a toilet, despite there being an easy-to-find portable toilets located at the northeast end of the park.

https://www.abqjournal.com/2523606/cemeteries-lament-bathing-camps-on-grounds.htm

Seven  separate appeals of the Dawn Legacy Point “Safe Outdoor Spaces” homeless tent encampment have been filed asking the City Planning Department to reverse its decision and deny the Safe Outdoor Space application of Dawn Legacy for 1250 Menaul.  The 7 appellants are:

Santa Barbara Martineztown Neighborhood Association (AC-22-11, PR-2022-007490, VA-2022-00233)

Albuquerque Boca Hotel Limited Partnership dba Crown Plaza Albuquerque (AC-22-12, PR-2022-007490, VA-2022-00239)

Greater ABQ Hotel & Lodging Association (AC-22-13, PR-2022-007490-VA-2022-00240)

Beth Brownell, Stronghurst Improvement Association (AC-22-14, PR-2022-007490-VA-2022-00238)

LifeRoots Inc. (Law Offices of Brian A. Thomas) (AC-22-16, PR-2022-007490, VA-2022-00242)

Menaul School (AC-22-17, PR-2022-007490-VA-2022-00243)

Reule LLC (Robert D Reule) (AC-22-18, PR-2022-007490, VA-2022-00239)

The City of Albuquerque Land Use Hearing Officer has now scheduled a hearing on all 7 of the above appeal cases on Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 9:00 am in the Vincent E. Griego Chambers at the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Government Center, One Civic Plaza NW, Albuquerque, NM 87102.

The public is encouraged to attend and give support to the appellants.

 COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

Republican Albuquerque City Councilor Trudy Jones should be absolutely ashamed of herself for her flip flopping of major proportions in voting to uphold Mayor Keller’s veto. In the context of the 1250 Menaul safe outdoor space for victims of sex trafficking, she should know that woman who are victims of sex trafficking need permanent housing that is a safe place to live and be provided with far more stable housing than a tent in an open area.  A tent encampment for victims of sex trafficking is nothing short of inhumane treatment of woman who have been victimized. Encouraging victims of sex trafficking to live in tents is nothing more than victimizing them again. What is being created at 1205 Menaul, NE is a location for victims to become victims once again. There is no common sense to it and it’s just plain crazy.

The actual location is troubling and has the potential of becoming a magnet for crime, prostitution or illicit drug trade. It’s located in close proximity to a truck stop known amongst law enforcement for prostitution and illicit drug activity.  It’s directly across the street from a major call center, a motel suite and is walking distance of Menaul Boarding School and apartments. Occupants of the ‘Safe Outdoor Space’ will not confined and would be free to go and come as they pleased and could easily wind up uninvited wherever they want to go. This includes the truck stop and disrupting the peaceful use and enjoyment at nearby locations or engaging in illicit activity.

The millions being spent each year by the city to deal with the homeless with the “housing first” policy should be more than sufficient to deal with housing the homeless, yet Mayor Keller demands and wants more from the public in the form of Safe Outdoor Spaces.  Safe Outdoor Space encampments violates the city’s “housing first” policy by not providing a form of permanent housing and with reliance on temporary housing.

Safe Outdoor Spaces are not the answer to the homeless crisis. “Safe Outdoor Spaces” will be a disaster for the city as a whole. They will destroy neighborhoods, make the city a magnet for the homeless and destroy the city’s efforts to manage the homeless through housing. The homeless crisis will not be solved by the city, but it can and must be managed. Safe Outdoor Spaces represent a very temporary place to pitch a tent, relieve oneself, bathe and sleep at night with rules that will not likely be followed.

The answer is to the homeless crisis is to provide the homeless the support services, including food and permanent lodging, and mental health care needed to allow the homeless to turn their lives around and perhaps become productive self-sufficient citizens.

 

ABQ Journal Poll On Voter’s Opinions: Crime, Homelessness, Education, Economy, Covid, Causes Of Crime, Pre Trial Detention, Gun Control; Constitutional Amendment For Early Child Care; Dinelli Commentary And Analysis   

From August 31 through to September 3, the Albquerquerqu Journal published a series of front-page articles of a  poll conducted primarily for the 2022 midterm election.  The reports covered the following:

  1. Voter’s opinions on issues facing the state
  2. What voters felt were the causes of crime and pretrial detention
  3. Gun Control measures
  4. The Permanent Fund Constitution Amendment

“The Journal Poll was based on a scientific, statewide sample of 518 voters who cast ballots in the 2018 and/or 2020 general election and who said they are likely to vote in the upcoming election. The poll was conducted from Aug. 19 through Aug. 25. All interviews were conducted by live, professional interviewers, with multiple callbacks to households that did not initially answer the phone. Both cellphone numbers (79%) and landlines (21%) of proven general election voters were used. The voter sample has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.3 percentage points.”

The link to the quoted poll results and news article is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/2528871/ex-those-most-likely-to-vote-also-worry-about-the-economy-and-public.html

JOURNAL POLL REPORT ON ISSUES FACING STATE

On August 31 the Journal reported the results of it poll on the various issues voters felt were serious in the state. In the poll, respondents were read a list of five issues facing New Mexico and asked to state if they felt each one was a “very serious problem, somewhat serious problem, minor problem, or no problem at all.” The specific issues asked about in the poll were Crime, Homelessness, Quality of Education, the Strength of the State’s Economy, and Covid 19.

The poll question and the results reported are as follows:

How serious are these issues facing New Mexico?

CRIME

Very Serious: 82% Somewhat Serious:  14% Minor:  3% No Problem:  0 Don’t Know/Would Not Say: 1%

DINELLI COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

It should come as absolutely no surprise to anyone that Crime was listed as “Very Serious” problem with a whopping 82%. Concern about crime cut across party lines, geographic regions and age.  Albuquerque and the State has seen a major spike in violent crime and the rates are some of the highest in the country. In the last 3 years, Albuquerque has had a breaking number of homicides each year.  In 2021 the city had 117 homicides.  As of August 30, APD reports that there have been 88 homicides, with the city well on it way to breaking the 2021 all time record.

apd-homicide-list-for-web-site-as-of-02sep2022.pdf (cabq.gov)

HOMELESSNESS

Very Serious: 77% Somewhat Serious: 16% Minor: 4%   No Problem: 1%   Don’t Know/Would Not Say: 2%

DINELLI COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

When it comes to the issue of Homelessness, it should come as no surprise that 77% feel that it is a very serious problem, once again with Albuquerque being the driving force behind the increase for concern.  Likely voters in the Albuquerque metropolitan area were far more likely than people in eastern or southwestern New Mexico to call homelessness a very serious problem. According to the Journal report, the 77% is a sharp increase from four years ago when 54% of likely voters described homelessness as a very serious problem.  Simply put, the homeless numbers have increased as has their visibility with the government struggling to come to a solution on how to deal with the crisis. Mayor Tim Keller’s recent closure of Coronado Park as well as his failure to manage the homeless crisis has become a major source of controversy.

QUALITY OF EDUCATION

Very Serious:  61% Somewhat Serious: 24% Minor: 9% No Problem: 4% Don’t Know/Would Not Say: 3

DINELLI COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

The 61% “very concern” for education is based in sobering reality and understanding of the state’s education system, but there is major reason for optimism for improvement.

On January 19, 2022, the New Mexico Voices for Children released the 2021 Kids Count Data Book. New Mexico’s rankings in the nation for education was 50th.  The state ranked 29th in the number of young children not enrolled in school, 49th in the nation for 8th grade math proficiency and 50th in the nation for 4th grade reading proficiency and 25% of New Mexican high schoolers do not graduate on time.  The links to the Kids Count Data Book is here:

https://www.nmvoices.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/KidsCount-DataBook2021-FINAL.pdf

https://www.nmvoices.org/archives/16481

On Friday, July 20, 2018, Santa Fe District Court Judge Sarah Singleton ruled in the case of Yazzie v. State of New Mexico and Governor Suzanna Martinez that the state of New Mexico was violating the constitutional rights of at-risk students by failing to provide them with a sufficient education. In response to the court ruling, the New Mexico legislature increased public education funding to the highest levels in state history.  During the last 3 years, the New Mexico legislature dramatically increased  public education funding, created the Early Childhood Department (CYFD), issued mandates to Children, Youth and Families and Public Education departments, and gave raises to educators.

The 2022 New Mexico Legislature approved an $8.48 billion state budget, the largest budget in state history. The budget bill boosts state spending by $1 billion, nearly 14%, over current budget levels. The enacted budget includes significant increases in spending in areas that should have a direct impact on major areas identified by the New Mexico Kids Count Data Book. Annual spending on K-12 grade public education was increased by $425 million to $3.87 billion, a 12% boost.

A trio of bills to fund programs to help Native American students succeed in school past was enacted by the 2022 legislature. The house bills provided more than $70 million to tribal entities to help offer culturally relevant lesson plans and access to virtual and after-school programs for those students. The budget contains salary increases of 7% for school districts and state government staff across the state. A minimum hourly wage of $15 for public employees and higher base salaries for teachers is provided. The enacted budget extends free college tuition to most New Mexico residents pursuing two- and four-year degrees. $75 million is allocated to the “opportunity scholarship” program, providing free tuition and fees for New Mexico residents.

On the November 8 general election ballot is also a Constitutional Amendment that if passed will increase funding by the millions from the state’s permanent school fund with more funding to go towards extra funding in the millions for K-12 education. Outlined below is a report on a separate poll question on the Constitutional Amendment.

STRENGTH OF THE STATE’S ECONOMY

Very Serious:  52% Somewhat Serious: 30%   Minor: 9%   No Problem: 3%

Don’t Know/Would Not Say: 5%

DINELLI COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

The 52% “Very Serious” and 30% “Somewhat Concern” poll numbers   for the state’s economy must be tempered with reality. Things are not at all as bad as the poll suggests.

On August 16, during a meeting of the influential New Mexico Legislative Finance Committee held in Chama, New Mexico, legislators were told the state will have a staggering projected $2.5 billion in “new” money during the 2023 budget year that starts on July 1, 2023.  The total revenue is forecast is to rise from $9.2 billion in the fiscal year that just ended to nearly $10.9 billion for 2023.   The projections were reported by the LFC executive economists. The LFC economists reported that the $2.5 money, which represents the difference between current spending levels and projected new revenue, is in addition to a projected budget surplus of nearly $3.8 billion for the current fiscal year and with upwards of $2.6 billion to go into the state’s early childhood trust fund. According to the economic projections reported, the revenue flow is showing no signs of slowing down.  It is inflation related consumer spending, strong wage growth and increased oil production that is spiking the state’s revenue flows to historic heights.

On August 19, 2022, the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions (DWS) released an Economic Update on the state’s unemployment rates. The Department of Workforce Solutions (DWS) reported that New Mexico’s unemployment dropped to the lowest it has been since September 2008.  The DWS reported that the unemployment rate for the state in July stood at 4.5%, a drop from 4.9% in June of this year and a year-over-year decrease from 7% from July 2021.  This is the second month in a row the unemployment rate has come in below 5% this year.  Despite the reduction in unemployment rates, the state is struggling with a low workforce participation rate which is the measurement of working-aged adults that are participating in the labor force and who are looking for a job.  According to the Department of Workforce solutions (DWS), there is a need for more workers across all industries.  The DWS says it has been focusing on the issue by setting up programs funded largely by federal dollars and creating a template for outreach to non-working New Mexicans.

https://www.petedinelli.com/2022/08/23/drop-in-new-mexicos-unemployment-rate-to-4-5-vacancies-and-need-for-workers-abound-state-well-on-its-way-to-recovering-to-pre-pandemic-work-levels-republicans-forget-7-8-unemployment/exicans.

COVID 19

Very Serious: 25% Somewhat Serious: 35% Minor: 25% No Problem: 14% Don’t Know/Would Not Say: 1%

DINELLI COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

The 25% “Very Serious” % “Somewhat Serious” concern over Covid 19 is a clear indication that the state, much like the rest of the country, is now pulling out of the effects of the pandemic and is in an indicator that things are indeed getting back to normal and proof of the effectiveness of the vaccines. The 25% “very serious” concern is in sharp contrast to two years ago when the pandemic resulted in closure of businesses, schools and public functions and mask mandates when there were no vaccines.

Notwithstanding the decline of Covid 19 as being a “very serious” concern to voters, the poll broke along party lines on COVID-19.  According to the Journal report:

“Supporters of Governor Lujan Grisham, who issued public health care orders and restricted in-person activity at businesses and schools during early parts of the pandemic, were much more likely than supporters of other candidates to describe COVID-19 as a very serious problem at 29% or somewhat serious problem at 42%.  … Lujan Grisham’s supporters appeared to give her credit for being tough on COVID and addressing it.  Just 21% of Ronchetti supporters described COVID-19 as a very serious problem, and 27% described it as a somewhat serious concern.”

JOURNAL POLL REPORT ON CAUSES OF CRIME

On September 1 the Albuquerque Journal reported the results of its poll on voters’ opinions on what they believe are the leading causes of crime and pretrial detention. Those polled on the “causes of crime” were allowed up to 3 responses and the poll compiled the top 9 answers.

CAUSES OF CRIME

The Journal poll questioned voters on their beliefs as to the causes of high crime rates.  The poll question and the results reported are as follows:

“What do you believe is the leading cause of New Mexico’s high crime rate?”

DRUGS: 31%

POVERTY: 15%

RELEASING DEFENDANTS AHEAD OF TRIAL: 15%

LIGHT SENTENCES OF JUDGES: 14%

HOMELESSNESS: 13%

WEAK/BROKEN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM:12%

POOR ECONOMY: 8%

UNEMPLOYMENT: 8%

NOT ENOUGH POLICE OFFICERS: 8%

 Brian Sanderoff, the president of Research & Polling Inc., whose company did the poll, had this to say to the Journal about the poll results:  

“Seven out of the 10 most frequently mentioned issues among likely voters deal with societal issues, challenges that we face regarding drug abuse, poverty, economy, homelessness, mental illness. … And three of the 10 are dealing more with criminal justice issues.”

Sanderoff said that the causes for crime by those polls broke along party lines. Republican voters were more likely to mention problems in the criminal justice system while Democrats were more likely to mention societal issues.  Sanderoff said this:

“When you look at the same thing by candidate …  Michelle Lujan Grisham supporters are nearly twice as likely to mention poverty than Ronchetti supporters.”

PRETRIAL DETENTION

On November 8, 2016, the “New Mexico Denial of Bail Measure” was approved by New Mexico voters by a landslide vote. The Constitutional Amendment amended the New Mexico Constitution to change the conditions under which a defendant can be denied bail and not released from custody pending trial. The Constitutional Amendment was designed to retain the right to pretrial release for “non-dangerous” defendants. The adopted amendment changed bond requirements allowing bail to be denied to a defendant who has been charged with a felony only if the prosecutor can prove to a judge that the defendant poses “a threat to the public.” The adopted amendment also provides that a defendant who is not a danger to the community or a flight risk cannot be denied bail solely because of the defendant’s financial inability to post a money or property bond. The final vote was 87.23%, with 616,887 voting YES and 12.77%, with 90,293 voting No.

https://votesmart.org/elections/ballot-measure/2076/a-joint-resolution-proposing-an-amendment-to-article-2-section#.XNyEJo5KiUk

Over the last 6 years, violent crime rates have increased significantly, and high-profile violent crimes have been reported where criminal defendants have been released pending trial and the public attitudes and perceptions on pretrial detention have changed, albeit no thanks to elected officials placing the blame on the courts for high violent crime rates. The

Journal poll questioned voters on changing “pretrial detention” and   changing the law to make it easier for judges to hold individuals who have been charged with certain violent crimes in jail until trial.  The Journal poll asked the question:

“Do you support or oppose changing New Mexico law to make it easier for judges  to hold individuals who have  who have been charged with certain violent crimes in jail until trial?”

 The Journal Poll results were as follows:

85% support the change

4% oppose the change

8% said it depends

3% said they did not know or would not answer

According to the Journal article, while there are slight variations across political parties, regions of the state and education levels, in nearly every demographic more than 80% of respondents said they supported a change. Brian Sanderoff, the president of Research & Polling Inc. told the Journal:

“Rarely do you see numbers where 85% of the people supports something and only 4% oppose on questions that we typically ask in a Journal Poll.  And so we’re seeing just very significant, very large support levels for this change in the law, regardless of gender, ethnicity, party, etc.   …  Likely voters are clearly expressing some frustration regarding the high crime rate. … It would still be up to the governor and the Legislature to address the public’s concern in an effective and constitutional manner.”

Sanderoff reported that among those who, if the gubernatorial election were held today, would vote for incumbent Michelle Lujan Grisham, a Democrat, 81% supported changing the law.  That compares to 90% who would vote for Republican Mark Ronchetti, and 97% of those who would vote for Libertarian.  Sanderoff also reported that political leanings plays a major role in “pretrial detention” attitudes.  Sanderoff reported 93% of those who identified as conservative said they would support changing the law compared to 76% of those who identified as liberal and 87% who identified as moderate.

DINELLI COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

Changing the law to make it easier for judges to hold persons who have committed certain violent crimes is easier said than done. Further, studies have suggested that even with the change, it likely have little impact on crime and crime may not go down.

The fact that the law was changed by constitutional means that it would then again require a constitutional amendment or a repeal of what was passed in 2016. Further proposed legislative changes have failed. During the 2022 legislative session, Governor Lujan Grisham proposed major changes to reshape the pretrial detention system and they failed.  Simply put, legislators said they were not convinced the proposed changes would address crime and questioned their constitutionality.

Complicating legislative changes were the fact that several studies and reports, including one by the bipartisan Legislative Finance Committee, found that the proposals put forward by the Governor and state prosecutors would have little or no impact on reducing violent crime.

It was on September 15, 2019, that the Administrative Office of the Courts issued the results of a report to take sharp issue with the proposals to change the bail bond system once again. The study was conducted by the University of New Mexico (UNM). The report supported the proposition that the existing system does not endanger the public. The UNM study reviewed 10,289 Bernalillo County felony cases from July 2017 to March 2020 in which defendants were released from jail while awaiting trial. The statistical findings were decisive and reported as follows:

Of the cases analyzed, only 13 were arrested for a first-degree felony while on pretrial release, or about 0.1% of the total. 19% of felony defendants released from jail pending trial, 1,951 of 10,289, were arrested for new criminal activity during the pretrial period. Most of those arrests were for fourth-degree felonies and misdemeanors, including property, drug and violent crimes. Fewer than 5% of defendants, or up to 480, released pretrial were arrested for new violent crimes. Of the cases analyzed, 95.3% were not arrested for violent crimes during the pretrial period.

Artie Pepin, director of the Administrative Office of the Courts, had this to say about the study:

“The evidence from research clearly shows that the great majority of people released pending trial are not committing new crimes. … Objective research validates the pretrial justice improvements under way in New Mexico. Blaming judges and courts for crimes highlighted in news accounts does nothing to make anyone safer.”

In July, 2022 a study by the Santa Fe Institute and the University of New Mexico Institute for Social Research released found that under House Bill 5,  which was proposed during the 2022 legislative session and failed, would have resulted in an additional 2,403 people held in jail. The study found that those people were released and while awaiting trial, 96% were not charged with any violent crimes and 85% were not charged with any other new crimes.

https://www.abqjournal.com/2529113/journal-poll-vast-majority-think-pretrial-detention-law-should-change.html

Under the United States and the New Mexico Constitutions, all are guaranteed the right of due process of law no matter how heinous or violent the crime. In criminal trials, with no exceptions, any defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by the prosecution. A person is also entitled to post bond.

What is always forgotten whenever bond reform is discussed are some of the main reasons for the changes in the law: jail overcrowding and people held for crimes they did not commit or held on low level criminal charges, such as drugs, felony thefts and credit card fraud charges, for months and at times years only to be released. Those that could afford or had the resources to pay a bond, cash or surety, were released while those who were indigent sat in jail days, weeks or even months awaiting a trial, no matter the charges.

Prior to the bond reform, the Bernalillo County Detention Center was chronically overcrowded. Years ago, the downtown jail could house up to 800 and it often would house up to 1,200 forcing the doubling up on individual cell space. The overcrowding resulted in a Federal Lawsuit that was finally settled after almost 30 years of litigation. The West side facility after it was built can house up to 2,000, and sure enough overcrowding occurred again within a matter of months.

The New Mexico Supreme Court needs to revisit the bond rules, change them and find a permanent solution that will give the lower court’s far more latitude and discretionary authority when it comes to the bond hearings and holding violent criminals in jail until trial. Common sense guidelines, not hard-set mathematical formulas allowing no discretion, need to be given the Judges to allow them to make decisions that they believe are in the best interest to protect the public as well as the defendant’s rights to due process of law. Otherwise, the New Mexico legislature may act on its own and seek repeal of the constitutional amendment.

GUN CONTROL

On Sunday, September 4, the Journal published poll results on two-gun control proposals.  Both proposals received overwhelming bi partisan support from those polled.  The poll questions and results were as follows:

Do you support or oppose legislation in New Mexico to raise the age from 18 to 21 to purchase an AR-15 style semi-automatic rifle?

Support: 72%

Oppose:  21%

It depends: 4%

Don’t know/won’t say: 2%

GENDER BREAKDOWN

Female support: 75%

Female opposition: 19%

Male support: 69%

Male Opposition: 24%

POLITICAL PARTY BREAKDOWN

Democrat Support: 85%

Democrat Opposition: 11%

Republican Support: 53%

Republican Opposition: 35%

OTHER PARTY

Other Party Support: 77%

Other Party Opposition: 19%

Do you support or oppose making it a crime if a person fails to safely secure a firearm from children?

Support: 73%

Oppose: 14%

It depends: 10%

Don’t know/won’t say: 3%

 GENDER BREAKDOWN

Female support: 76%

Female opposition: 11%

Male support: 70%

Male Opposition: 17%

POLITICAL PARTY BREAKDOWN

Democrat Support: 81%

Democrat Opposition:  9%

Republican Support: 61%

Republican Opposition: 22%

Other Party Support: 74%

Other Party Opposition: 10%

DINELLI COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

New Mexico lawmakers in recent years have passed laws expanding background check requirements for firearm purchases and allowing guns to be seized from individuals deemed to pose a threat to themselves or others. But with the state’s firearm violence rate still high, many voters want lawmakers to enact additional gun control measures.

While Democratic voters were significantly more likely to support the gun control measures, a majority of Republican voters surveyed also expressed support for both proposals. A total of 61% of GOP voters surveyed support making it a crime to fail to store guns safely around children, while 53% of Republicans said they support raising the minimum age to purchase AR-15-style rifles.

Brian Sanderoff, the president of Albuquerque-based Research & Polling Inc., had this to say:

“We’re seeing that even conservative voters, at least a small majority of them support raising the minimum age to purchase certain firearms.”

It is difficult to gage what effect, if any, the passage of “gun safety” measures as the poll questions suggest, will have on reducing gun violence and mass shootings.  More realistic proposals that will likely reduce gun violence would be proposals such as banning the manufacturing, sale or distribution of AR-15 style semi-automatic rifles and, in the state, gun registration, banning large capacity gun magazines and types of ammunition and mandatory background checks and perhaps repealing the state’s open carry provision in its constitution.

CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMEMT FOR K-12  FUNDING

On September 3, the Albuquerque Journal published the poll results on the constitutional amendment that will to tap more heavily into New Mexico’s permanent school fund is drawing broad voter support ahead of the Nov. 8 election.

The poll question asked was:

Do you support or oppose the proposed constitutional amendment that would distribute more money from New Mexico’s Land Grant Permanent School Fund to be used for early childhood education, teacher compensation, and K-12 education programs?

The poll results were as follows:

Support:  69%

Oppose: 15%

It depends: 8%

Don’t know/won’t say: 8%

 Although the constitutional amendment has strong bi-partisan support, Democrats support the measure by 23% more than Republicans, while Republican opposition is upwards of 4 times of Democrats. Following are the percentages:

SUPPORT FOR AMENDMENT

Democrat: 79%

Republican: 56%

Other parties: 70%

OPPOSITION TO  THE AMENDMENT

Democrat: 7%

Republcan: 26%

Other parties:  14%

Brian Sanderoff, president of Research & Polling, in reaction to the results said this:

“We know New Mexicans recognize that early childhood education is critical in a state like New Mexico, where we have generational challenges bringing New Mexico’s children up to speed.  … Democrats just tend to be more supportive of additional government monies going toward social programs than Republicans but even a majority of Republicans support the proposed amendment.”

Sanderoff  said support for the measure is not likely to narrow unless well-funded opposition emerges before Election Day.

The link to the full, unedited Journal article is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/2529481/education-amendment-gets-bipartisan-backing-ex-the-ballot-question-w.html

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

New Mexico’s permanent fund for education funding is one of  the largest of such funds in the United States. The fund grows with a combination of investment income and royalty revenue from oil and gas production on state lands. The proposed amendment if it passes will boost the annual distribution for the permanent school fund to 6.25%.

According to Legislative Finance Committee economists, the state receives 5% out of the permeant fund each year to spend on public schools and other beneficiaries. The fund will be providing $1.3 billion the current 2022-2023 fiscal year. Bottom of Form

State economists say the proposed amendment will generate upwards of  $230 million a year in new revenue with 60% of the funds to be dedicated to early childhood education and 40% for K-12 education.

Even if the amendment does not pass the annual funding for early childhood programs has been increase dramatically by the legislature going from $179 million to $579 million over a 10-year period.

Supporters say the investment would be worth it, making more money available for programs that can interrupt the cycle of poverty, and improve the education and well-being of New Mexico’s children.

Opponents of the increased withdrawals say it would eventually leave the state with smaller annual distributions because pulling more out of the fund now will slow its growth.

Links to related blog articles are here:

Albuquerque Journal Poll Released In Governor’s Race: Governor Lujan Grisham 47%, Mark Ronchetti 40%, Undecided 5%, Libertarian 5%; Two Months Is An Eternity In Politics; Expect McCleskey Hit Pieces Against Lujan Grisham

https://www.petedinelli.com/2022/08/28/albuquerque-journal-poll-released-in-governors-race-governor-lujan-grisham-47-mark-ronchetti-40-undecided-5-libertarian-5-two-months-is-an-eternity-in-politics-expect-mccleskey-hit-piec/

Albuquerque Journal Poll Results For Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, State Treasurer and Land Commissioner; Governor’s Race Closest; Democrats Lead In All Races; Republicans Win When Democrats Fail To Show Up 

https://www.petedinelli.com/2022/08/29/albuquerque-journal-poll-results-for-governor-secretary-of-state-attorney-general-state-treasurer-and-land-commissioner-governors-race-closest-democrats-lead-in-all-races-republicans-wi/

Journal Poll Reflects Woman’s Right To Choose And Reproductive Rights Decisive Issue In New Mexico Governor’s Race And National Midterms; Poll Proves Ronchetti Extremist And Out Of Step With New Mexico’s Values; Governor MLG Signs Executive Order For Abortion Clinic

 

 

 

 

 

Mark Ronchetti’s Education Plan Merits An “F” Grade;  Ignors 8 Years Of Destruction Of State’s Public Education System Under Republican Governor; School Vouchers Not Much Of An Education Plan

On September 6, standing in front of the Albuquerque Public Schools Building in Uptown Albuquerque, instead of a TV green screen, Republican Candidate for Governor Mark boldly announced his 8-point education plan to get New Mexico’s education system “back on track.”  Ronchetti released his plan just days after the New Mexico Department of Education released dismissal academic proficiency rates with  standardized test results showing only about a quarter to a third of students met the proficiency standards

In a nutshell, Mark Ronchetti wants to have major influence on how and what is it taught in the public schools, give parents more say so on education curriculums and how their children are taught, redistribute state funding and issue $4,500 in vouchers he calls “stipends” to help parents pay for education. Ronchetti wants to limit growth in school administration spending and  increase instructional time for students and dictate that  COVID-19 relief funds are spent on classroom programs not capital improvements. Simply put, Ronchetti’s Education Plan is one driven by conservative Republican ideology.

The link to review the unedited Ronchetti Education Plan is here:

https://markronchetti.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/NM-MR-2227-Education-Plan.pdf

RONCHETTI’S 8 POINT EDUCATION PLAN

This blog article is a detailed analysis of Republican Mark Ronchetti’s 8-point Education Plan deleting his political rhetoric from the plan.  Following is a break down and analysis of each of the 8 points:

  1. MAKE UP FOR LOST TIME

Ronchetti faults Governor Lujan Grisham for issuing emergency health care orders shutting down the state’s public school system because of the corona virus pandemic.  He proclaims closure of the schools resulted in students losing   406 million in-class hours of instruction that cannot be made up and  that academic growth suffered.  To solve the lost time instruction deficiency, Ronchetti proposes the following:

  1. Provide every low-income child’s family in the first through third grades a $1,500 education “stipend” for 3 consecutive years to purchase outside-of-the-classroom academic support for their child. The projected cost of the program is $100 million.
  2. Require school districts to spend their COVID-relief funds on classroom learning interventions, directed at helping those who have fallen furthest behind.
  3. Launch school-based summer academies, short academic programs designed to help struggling students master the basics and get back on grade level over the summer.
  4. Increase meaningful and strategic instructional time throughout the school year with a school by-school commitment to getting kids more time in the classroom.

DINELLI ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Ronchetti faults Governor Lujan Grisham for issuing emergency health care orders shutting down the state’s public school system because of the corona virus. He does not disclose what he would have done.  It’s likely he would have done absolutely nothing and allowed the public schools to remain open and become incubators for the virus risking the health of all school children and their families.

Use of the term “stipend” for the proposal to give $1,500 for 3 consecutive years is a pathetic attempt by Ronchetti to avoid the term “vouchers” for education.  There is no requirement that the stipends advanced must actually be used for education. Vouchers for private schools has been a long-held ploy of Republicans to undercut funding of public-school systems.

The manner and method covid relief funds are spent, school-based summer academies and “strategic instructional” proposed are a repetition of policies already in place or in the process of being implemented by the Public Education Department (PED) or elected school boards.  The New Mexico legislature has further allocated funding to add additional days of schooling to make up for lost classroom time.

  1. PUT MORE EDUCATION DOLLARS IN THE CLASSROOM

Ronchetti proclaims general and central school office administration has increased by 55%, while instructional and student support spending grew by 20%. According to Ronchetti, nearly 70% of school districts have grown their central office administrative spending faster than their classroom spending.  Ronchetti wants to  limit the growth of administrative spending in education, directing the lion’s share of new education dollars into classrooms including additional instructional coaches, teacher leaders, academic resources, and interventions for struggling students. Additional dollars would also be targeted to retain and recruit new teachers to help bring down class sizes to improve the teacher-to-student ratio.

DINELLI ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Democrat State Senator and Majority Leader Mimi Stewart responded to Ronchetti’s plan to put more education dollars in the classroom and not school administration by saying public education administration spending in schools simply “is not a problem.”  Legislation already requires the Public Education Department (PED) to monitor school and district budgets to ensure funding goes to the functions most likely to improve student outcomes.

Ronchetti’s Education Plan is painfully inadequate to the point of being embarrassingly useless at best. What is pathetic is that Mark Ronchetti suffers from “political amnesia” when he does not even mention in his Public Education Plan the mandates of the landmark case of Yazzie v. State of New Mexico and Martinez that requires state funding.  

Republican Mark Ronchetti is pathetic as he desperately tries to hold Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham somehow responsible for the failures of our public education system  when says:

“It’s time to abandon the failed policies of Lujan Grisham and [legislators.]  … We have failed the kids of this state and this system year, after year, after year.”

It was Governor Lujan Grisham’s predecessor former Republican Governor “She Who Shall Not Be Named” who failed for a full 8 years  “year, and year after year”  New Mexico’s kids by destroying the state’s public  education system.

Roncheti and the Republican party should be absolutely ashamed of the damage done by the former Republican Governor to New Mexico’s public education system.  The former Republican Governor with her public education policies and her Secretary of Public Education appointments, especially the appointment of Secretary Hanna Skandera, contributed and resulted in the state’s failing education system.

YAZZIE V. STATE OF NEW MEXICO AND MARTINEZ REVISITED

On Friday, July 20, 2018, Santa Fe District Court Judge Sarah Singleton ruled in the case that the state of New Mexico violated the constitutional rights of at-risk students by failing to provide them with an education. The Court ruling centered on the guaranteed right under the New Mexico Constitution to provide a sufficient education for all children. The lawsuit alleged a severe lack of state funding, resources and services to help students, particularly children from low-income families, students of color, including Native Americans, English-language learners and students with disabilities. The Court found that the New Mexico Public Education Department (PED) under Republican Governor Suzann Martinez did not do the best it could with the funding it was given by the legislature to the education system.

BLISTERING COURT RULING

State District Judge Sarah Singleton pulled no punches with her decision. The Judge found that it was clear that many New Mexico students were not receiving the basic education in reading, writing and math they should be receiving in our public-school system. As a matter of law, Judge Singleton wrote the “lack of funds is not a defense to providing constitutional rights.”

Judge Singleton wrote:

“[The evidence presented at trial] proves that the vast majority of New Mexico’s at-risk children finish each school year without the basic literacy and math skills needed to pursue post-secondary education or a career. … Indeed, overall New Mexico children rank at the very bottom in the country for educational achievement. … The at-risk students are still not attaining proficiency at the rate of non-at-risk students … and the programs being lauded by [the Public Education Department] are not changing this picture.”

According to the judge’s ruling, in New Mexico at the time, 71.6% of the state’s public-school students come from low-income families, and 14.4% are English-language learners. Further, 14.8% of students have disabilities, and 10.6% are Native American. Judge Singleton addressing proficiency rates for Native American students said that in the previous 3 years, those students’ reading proficiency was at 17.6% and their math proficiency was at 10.4%.

The Court also found that New Mexico does not have enough teachers and that New Mexico teachers are among the lowest paid in the country and stated:

“The evidence shows that school districts do not have the funds to pay for all the teachers they need. … [An example is] Gadsden, one of the better performing school districts in the state, has had to eliminate over 53 classroom positions and 15 essential teachers since 2008.”

Judge Singleton ruling addressed the state teacher evaluation system implemented by the Governor Martinez Administration by saying:

[The teacher evaluation system] may be contributing to the lower quality of teachers in high-need schools. … In general, punitive teacher evaluation systems that penalize teachers for working in high-need schools contribute to problems in this category of schools.”

The Court wrote that she was not persuaded by the Martinez Administration’s arguments that no new funding is needed because at-risk student performances are improving.

https://www.abqjournal.com/1200069/questions-surround-ruling-on-nm-education-funding.html

A spokeswoman for the state Public Education Department at the time announced that the State decided to appeal the ruling. However, soon after assuming office on January 1, 2018, Governor Lujan Grisham decided the state would not appeal the case, work at increasing funding for public education and changes to the system.

Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, provided the following statement after the court ruling:

“For too long, New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez and her administration have abandoned their responsibility to kids and public schools. This ruling confirms what parents and educators know—that New Mexico children are deprived of the essential resources, including qualified teachers and support staff, they need. This deprivation is especially severe for those at risk and in need of additional supports—English language learners, Native American students and those in poverty. The ruling also calls out the governor’s obsession with testing over teaching. … We call on the state to use this ruling as a long-overdue opportunity to overhaul its broken school funding system to ensure all New Mexico children are afforded the public education they deserve and are entitled to.”

Linls to news sources are here:

https://www.kob.com/albuquerque-news/judge-rules-lack-of-sufficient-education-for-all-nm-students-violates-constitutional-rights/4997869/?cat=500

https://www.petedinelli.com/2018/07/23/governor-martinez-legacy-illiterate-children-and-a-pizza-party/

LUJAN GRISHAM MAKES EDUCATION FUNDING PRIORITY

In response to the Yazzie v. State of New Mexico landmark education decision, Govern Lujan Grisham undertook to fully fund the state’s efforts to reform the State’s public education system and she was highly successful.  She succeeded in securing millions for public education during the 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 legislative sessions and her success is worth remembering.

2019 LEGISLATIVE SESSION

During the 2019 Legislative session, Governor Lujan Grisham made good on her commitment to improve New Mexico’s public education system. The 2019 legislature enacted dramatic increases in public education funding, created  the Early Childhood Department, issued mandates to the Children, Youth and Families and Public Education departments, not to mention raises for educators and increasing CYFD social workers by 125. These were clearly the biggest accomplishments of the 2019 Legislative session.

The total approved education budget was a whopping $3.2 Billion, 16% over the previous year’s budget, out of the total budget of $7 Billion. Included in the budget was a $500 million in additional funding for K-12 education and increases in teacher pay. Early childhood programs were given a major increase in funding. Under the enacted 2019-2020 budget, every public-school district was allocated significantly more funding.

Teachers did not have any raises to speak of for 8 years under the previous Republican Administration. Teachers and school administrators were given 6% pay raises with more money to hire teachers.

The creation of an “Early Childhood Department” was a major priority of the Governor Lujan Grisham it was funded and began full operation in June 2020.The new department will focus state resources on children from birth to 5 years of age.  A major goal of the new department, coupled with other investments, is more New Mexico children growing up to secure gainful employment as adults who don’t require government services.

2020 LEGISLTIVE SESSION

In 2020, the New Mexico legislature adjourned their 30-day session after approval of a $7.6 billion spending plan. The enacted budget increased spending by 7.6% over current levels. The new budget included $17 million for the new college scholarship program sought by Lujan Grisham. The goal was to provide need-based tuition aid for full-time students who already qualify for a separate assistance.  An Early Childhood Trust Fund of $320 million was approved that supporters hope will put $30 million annually toward the cause.

https://www.petedinelli.com/2020/02/21/monahans-take-on-2020-nm-legislature-short-session-and-more-a-so-so-30-day-session-comes-to-an-end/

2021 LEGISLTIVE SESSION

During the 2021 legislative session, the New Mexico legislature enacted a $7.4 billion state budget which Governor Lujan Grisham signed into law.  State government spending increased by 4.8%, or $373 million. Upwards of half of the $7.5 Billon dollar budget went go to public education. $110 million was allocated to extend the school year by ten days with an additional $120 million for kindergarten to fifth-grade programs to add 25 extra school days to make up for lost learning time.  Part of the budget will be used to increase the governor’s Opportunity Scholarships to $18 million which helps provide funding for tuition at two-year universities,  An additional $35 million will head towards addressing the needs of Native student’s education.

2022 LEGISLATIVE SESSION

During the 2022 New Mexico legislative session, annual spending for public education increased dramatically. Annual spending on K-12 grade public education was increased by $425 million to $3.87 billion, a 12% boost.  Starting July 1, the base pay for teachers rose to $50,000, $60,000 and $70,000 depending on the level of a teacher. According to a fiscal impact report, New Mexico’s average teacher salary was just under $55,000 a year. That’s lower than Colorado, Texas and Utah, but higher than Arizona and Oklahoma. Legislators also approved a measure to allow Indigenous language teachers to be paid at the same rate as their peers, even if they don’t have an undergraduate degree. For Native American language teachers paid as teaching assistants in many districts, their salaries could triple

https://www.kob.com/albuquerque-news/nm-teacher-pay-increase-bill-heads-to-governors-desk-after-unanimous-house-vote/6393826/

During the 2022 New Mexico legislative session, 3 bills supported by Governor Lujan Grisham and sponsored by Rep. Derrick Lente, D-Sandia Pueblo passed that were  in response to the historic 2018 Yazzie/Martinez court ruling.  House bills 87, 88 and 90 allocated more than $70 million to tribal entities to help offer culturally relevant lesson plans and access to virtual and after-school programs for those students.

The money will be used to create culturally relevant learning programs, including Native language programs, for students in the K-12 system.

extend learning opportunities and support tribal school libraries and allocate $29.6 million to four state colleges and three tribal colleges for 53 initiatives, such as building a Native American teacher pipeline and expanding high school-to-college programs to encourage those students to attend college.

https://nmpoliticalreport.com/2022/02/01/bills-to-address-yazzie-martinez-court-ruling-advance%ef%bf%bc/?mc_cid=21ff84b79b&mc_eid=d03b0979c3

  1. PROTECT PARENTS’ RIGHTS TO ENGAGE IN THEIR CHILD’S EDUCATION

Ronchetti proclaims he wants to enact laws to make it clear that parents have rights on how their children are taught. He wants parents to have the following rights:

  1. Parents should have access to course materials, curriculum, and books and know and have a say on what their children are being taught and learning. Ronchetti argues there is a reasonable expectation that students will be taught the basics at school “not be subjected to political agendas”.
  2. Understand at all times where their children stand academically and how schools are performing.  “Parents should know—at various points throughout the school year—whether their child is learning at grade level, and if not, what options and interventions are available to get them back on track.”
  3. Annual testing should be made available in a timely way so that parents, teachers, and schools can make summer-time decisions about interventions to keep kids progressing at grade level.
  4. Know how education funding is being spent, all the way down to the school level. Ronchetti says There is no investment more worthwhile than education and it accounts for 45% of the state budget. Parents must be able to easily determine whether the nearly $4 billion our state spends on public education is getting into classrooms and to kids who need the most help.
  5. Parents should be able to send their children to the public school that best meets their needs and have more public-school options to choose from and be empowered to select the public school that best fits the interests, needs, and abilities of their child, whether that’s a traditional, magnet, or charter school.

RONCHETTI SAYS:

“When we find public schools that are getting great results for the kids they serve, we should allow them to serve more students and encourage their learning models to be shared and implemented in other parts of the education system.”

DINELLI ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

It is a major red flag that Ronchetti intends to exert influence over what is taught in the state’s public schools when he says “There is a reasonable expectation that students will be taught the basics at school, not be subjected to political agendas”.  If this sounds at all too familiar, it’s because it is very much like Florida Governor Ron DeSantis who came to New Mexico to endorse Ronchetti.  

Ronchetti proclaims he wants to enact laws to make it clear that parents have rights on how their children are taught. What Ronchetti is advocating for without coming out and saying it is a “Parental Bill of Rights in Education” bill.   It was on March 22 that De Santis signed the controversial “Parental Rights in Education” where public school teachers in Florida are banned from holding classroom instruction about sexual orientation or gender identity. The bill is called by opponents as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill.

The truth is elected local school boards play the most critical role in ensuring parental rights and provide remedies to address grievances.  Many, if not all the “parental rightsMark Ronchetti wants to guarantee to parents already exist, either by existing state law or school board policies.  Parents can decide to send their children to public schools, charter schools, private schools or for that manner do home schooling.

A Governor Mark Ronchetti no doubt will take issue with “critical race” theory, evolution being taught in schools and will want school prayer.  It’s now painfully obvious that Governor Rochetti will want to be involved not only with what is taught in New Mexico classrooms but also what goes on in the privacy of a Doctor’s offices with their  woman patients and their reproductive rights given his position when it comes to abortion and a woman’s right to choose.

When Ronchetti says “Parents should know—at various points throughout the school year—whether their child is learning at grade level, and if not, what options and interventions are available to get them back on track” he ostensibly does not know that “parent teacher” conferences are a staple for younger students.  When it comes to mid school and high school students, parents always have the option to ask for conferences with school assigned counselors. As far as parents understanding at all times where their children stand academically” that is the purpose and function of quarterly report cards of students.

  1. BETTER PREPARE OUR STUDENTS FOR THE WORKFORCE

“Some students will choose college after graduating high school while others will enter the workforce. For students who will enter careers after high school, we can do a much better job ensuring they have the tools to be successful.”  Ronchetti’s plan is to include helping students earn work certifications while still in high school, so they can be as employable as possible, as quickly as possible.  Students who complete their high school course requirements by the end of the 11th grade would receive a scholarship to spend their entire senior year in an apprenticeship, internship, or career-focused postsecondary education.

The Ronchetti education plan would expand trade and vocational schools, and better align our high school and community college course offerings with the workforce shortage areas and industry growth target areas in New Mexico.  Ronchetti wants to allow those who are not traditional licensed teachers such as electricians, nurses, computer programmers, entrepreneurs, and others who have knowledge to share to teach in middle and high school classrooms.  This would help alleviate teacher recruitment challenges.  New Mexico’s education system should make it easier for students to “learn outside of a classroom’s walls—on job-sites, in hospitals, and “in the field” instead.”

DINELLI ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Ronchetti’s plan is to include helping students earn work certifications while still in high school. It’s a plan that already exists in many school systems in the state. CNM community college is already known for course offerings within workforce shortage areas and industry growth target areas in New Mexico. Examples include the nursing program, the film industry and law enforcement certifications.  Ronchetti’s plan to allow those who are not traditional licensed teachers such as electricians, nurses, computer programmers, entrepreneurs to teach will require a major overhaul of state public education licensing laws.

  1. IMPROVE THE SYSTEM SCHOOL-BY-SCHOOL, FOCUS ON DEVELOPING GREAT LEADERS

The public schools are failing to educate because of lack of leadership.  Great school leaders can turn around poor-performing schools, by elevating expectations, improving hiring practices, building a “can do” culture, better developing and supporting teachers, and implementing best practices designed to understand each child’s academic needs and help them grow.  Under the Rochetti education plan:

  1. A. Chronically low-performing schools would undergo leadership changes.
  2. The State’s very best principals would earn six-figure salaries and be given more autonomy in how they lead their school.
  3. Schools led by great principals would take on assistant principals who would train for a year or two under their leadership, then be deployed to lead schools of their own.
  4. Successful school leaders would be paired with principals in need of help, and they would engage in an active mentoring relationship.
  5. The highest-performing teachers in each school district would be encouraged and funded to enter principal development training.

DINELLI ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

When Ronchetti says “Chronically low-performing schools would undergo leadership changes” and “the public schools are failing to educate because of lack of leadership” he is not at all clear on exactly what he is talking about. He is long on political rhetoric with no specifics when he says “Great school leaders can turn around poor-performing schools, by elevating expectations, improving hiring practices, building a “can do” culture, better developing and supporting teachers, and implementing best practices designed to understand each child’s academic needs and help them grow”.  Simply put, this is what you can call “sound bite management” of the public education system designed to “purge” educator’s that are considered substandard or who do not tow” his philosophical education line.

  1. EARLY INTERVENTION ON LITERACY

New Mexico ranks 49th in the nation in literacy. Students who cannot read by the third grade have a harder time learning, are more prone to discouragement in later grades, and are more likely to drop out of school.

Ronchetti’s education plan for literacy growth hinges on three things:

  1. An expectation that every early-grade teacher is trained every year in the best strategies and science on teaching literacy
  2. Instructional coaches and support staff are prioritized toward English Language Arts classes in grades K through 3; and
  3. Both parents and students knowing their reading level—and how it’s changing—on a month-by-month basis, with regular conversations between parents and teachers about what needs to be done inside and outside the classroom to improve their reading skills.

The Ronchetti education plan focuses on early childhood education programs and accountability to improving kindergarten readiness for kids age 0 to 5.  The plan is to ensure the State’s new early Childhood Cabinet Department, which was created by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham in 2020, is fulfilling its intended purpose which is to better coordinate early childhood programs and ensure that those families who really need to be accessing the childcare, home visiting, and pre-K programs are, in fact, enrolling in them.

DINELLI ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Much if not all of Mark Ronchetti’s Education Plan dealing with early intervention on literacy is already being dealt with aggressively, addressed or planned by the Public Education Department in response to the reforms mandated by the landmark education case of Yazzie v. State of New Mexico and Martinez.  As a result of the landmark ruling, the Lujan Grisham over the last 4 legislative sessions has been highly successful in securing the millions necessary to implement the reforms to bring the public school system in compliance with the court ruling.

  1. ATTACK THE TRUANCY PROBLEM

The Ronchetti education plan cites that over 40% of the students in APS are chronically absent, which is nearly double the rate of absenteeism from a few years ago, calling it a “systemic failure.”   Ronchetti charges that Governor Lujan Grisham has taken a failing approach to truancy that serves no one.   The Ronchetti education plans is to Use COVID funds to hire and build teams in high truancy schools to focus exclusively on getting children back to school and/or finding education alternatives that meet the needs of the child and their family.  He proposes create high-risk classrooms with lower student-teacher ratios in high-risk schools for children experiencing high rates of truancy.

DINELLI ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Mark Ronchetti’s Education Plan dealing with attack the truancy problem” is already being be addressed by the individual school districts in the state.

  1. SCHOOL SAFETY AND ATTENTION TO MENTAL, EMOTIONAL HEALTH

The Ronchetti plan proclaims more needs to be done to recognize and address the mental health needs of students, including investing education resources in a more robust mental health system.

Ronchetti wants to implement a program aimed at placing retired law enforcement and military in the public schools to act as “Security Resource Officers” to provide security as part of faculty and they would pay into education retirement.  Each school would be allowed to define the role for its or security aide.

The benefits of having a security resources officer or security aide include:

  1. Increased perception of safety by students, staff, and parents resulting in an improved perception of the school environment.
  2. Leads to more positive relationships between police and young students, and between police and schools nurturing a positive attitude of respect.
  3. Police presence serves as a deterrent to crime and misbehavior.
  4. Allows police to establish relationships with students and staff that facilitate gathering information to prevent crimes or intervening with students who may be planning a crime.

DINELLI ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Mark Ronchetti’s education plan dealing with school safety and attention to mental, emotional health” reflects a level of sure ignorance in two areas of major concern.

With respect to addressing the mental health needs of students with a more “robust mental health system,” the State is still struggling with restoring the state mental health care system decimated by the former Republican Governor who shut down 15 mental health care providers after she made false accusations of Medicaid fraud billing and withholding state funding. In early 2016, following exhaustive investigations, the Attorney General cleared all 15 of the healthcare providers of any wrongdoing and exonerated all of them of fraud but the damage had been done.  Many of the 15 nonprofits could not continue and just went out of business leaving many of the 160,000 New Mexicans receiving behavioral health services without a behavioral health service provider.

Ronchetti’s  wants to implement a program aimed at placing retired law enforcement in the schools.  Ronchetti is ignorant of the fact that most if not all the school systems in the state already have “school resource officers” that provide security, many in response to school shootings in the country.

The Albuquerque Public School System already has its own, full time police force, most who are retired APD officers.   The City of Albuquerque also assigns and pays sworn APD police officers to provide security at all high schools in the city.

REACTION OF GOVERNOR LUJAN GRISHAM

Governor Lujan Grisham issued the following statement in response to the Ronchetti   Education Plan

“Governor Lujan Grisham believes that every New Mexico student, regardless of where they come from or who they are, should be able to access the high-quality education they deserve. That’s why her administration invested more than $1 billion to improve New Mexico’s public schools, raised educator pay to be the highest in the southwest, brought retired educators back to work, created universal pre-k, made child carefree for most New Mexico families, and built the most extensive tuition-free higher education program in the country. 

In contrast, Mark Ronchetti’s education ideas would disadvantage New Mexico’s most vulnerable students, especially rural and Native students, with a school voucher scheme that would drain funding from public schools by allowing wealthy parents to use taxpayer dollars to send their kids to private schools in cities, with no oversight or accountability for how tax dollars are spent.

Ronchetti opposes funding for early childhood education that nearly 70% of New Mexicans support and has said he would completely overturn the Opportunity Scholarship program allowing all New Mexicans to access a higher education. There’s a clear choice in this race between Gov. Lujan Grisham’s record of historic investments in New Mexico’s public schools, and Mark Ronchetti’s dangerous schemes to rip money out of the public school system.” 

REACTION BY STATE SENATOR MIMI STEWART

Albuquerque Democrat Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart, who is  a retired public-school teacher, was quick to  take issue with Ronchetti’s Public Education Plan asserting it was nothing more than a lead up to school vouchers.  She did so by bringing up a March radio interview where Ronchetti indicated his support for vouchers for private schools.

In the interview Ronchetti explain that vouchers would give flexibility to parents for their public-school education. Public education would come first but then he would build on success to cover private schools.   Ronchetti answered a question this way:

“Now when you said, you mentioned the money follows the student. How far would that money be able to follow the student? Does the student have to be in public school or would that money be able to follow if the parent wanted to put them in a private school?”

Ronchetti responded

“No, no, I think ideally, you want to give people the maximum amount of flexibility you can.”

[KSVP, 10:52-11:12, 3/31/22]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPGkcjx3Z7I

Senator Stewart had this to say about Ronchetti’s Education Plan:

“I really believe he’s a danger to public education here as we know it … Ronchetti seems determined to undermine public education in his effort to push school vouchers. And even though he said this morning those vouchers would be for public schools, he’s said in interviews that it would extend to private schools, draining funding for public schools and New Mexico’s most vulnerable students. That means he would send taxpayer dollars to private schools with no accountability to the public. We must keep public dollars in public schools. A zip code shouldn’t determine whether a child has access to a great education from a great public school. Parents should have more public-school options to choose from and be empowered to select the public school that best fits the interests, needs, and abilities of their child – whether that’s a traditional, magnet, or charter school.”

REACTION BY PUBLIC EDUCATION REPRESENTATIVES

Not at all surprising, the reaction of those within the state’s Public Education system to Ronchetti’s education plan was generally negative.  Many said it was no plan at all, would damage public education and much of what Ronchettis is being proposing is already being undertaken. For example, this year’s budget legislation requires the Public Education Department (PED) to monitor school and district budgets to ensure funding goes to the functions most likely to improve student outcomes.

Whitney Holland, president of the American Federation of Teachers noted that Lujan Grisham has a proven track record of accomplishment on education that goes beyond campaign promises.  That record includes a bipartisan bill that boosted the starting pay for teachers from $40,000 to $50,000, in addition to other increases.  The salary increases have made a real difference in recruitment of teachers.  According to Public Education Department data, upwards of 5,200 new teachers have joined the state’s education workforce in the recent fiscal year, up from fewer than 2,900 the year before.

Holland had this to say:

“We have seen her work firsthand. … Now is not the time to take our foot off the gas.”

The increase instructional time for students is already a priority of New Mexico policymakers and lawmakers who have made more funding available for programs that extend the school year, among other strategies.

https://www.abqjournal.com/2530262/ronchetti-pitches-his-plan-to-improve-nm-schools.html

https://www.koat.com/article/new-mexico-candidates-for-governor-education/41098849

FINAL COMMENTARY ANALYSIS

Mark Ronchetti’s Public Education Plan is as about as weak as it gets and it deserves a failing grade of “F”. When comes down to it, it is as if his education plan was hurriedly put together by someone with little or no knowledge of the state’s public education system and someone with no knowledge of the roles of locally elected school boards.  Before Republican Mark Ronchetti tries to offer anything more on improving the state’s public education system, it is suggested that he goes back to school and educate himself on the realities of public education and at least try to offer something more than just school vouchers.

ABQ City Councilor Trudy Jones Shows Cowardice Hiding From Her Constituents Before Voting “No” To Override Mayor Tim Keller’s Veto Of “Safe Outdoor Space” Moratorium;  8 Appeal One Approved Application

On September 7, in what can only be considered a major flip flop of epic proportions, Republican City Councilor Trudy Jones voted “NO” to override Democrat Mayor Tim Keller’s veto of a one-year moratorium on the application process for “Safe Outdoor Spaces”.   In order to override the veto, 6 YES votes were needed.  The 4 who voted NO to override were Republican Trudy Jones who joined Democrats Isaac Benton, Pat Davis and Tammy Fiebelcorn.  The 5 who voted YES to override the veto. Were Republicans Brook Bassam, Renee Grout, and Dan Lewis who were joined by Democrats Klarissa Peña and Louie Sanchez.

“Safe Outdoor Space” is a lot, or a portion of a lot, developed to provide designated spaces for occupancy by tents, recreational vehicles, and/or light vehicles. Designated spaces are provided to occupants at no charge. A safe outdoor space offers social services and support facilities.  The Integrated Development Ordinance (IDO) limits Safe Outdoor Space camps to 40 spots and a total of 50 residents each and makes them a temporary use where operators can run them for two years at a selected sites with the possibility of a single two-year extension.

https://www.cabq.gov/family/services/homeless-services/about-homeless-services#encampments

It was on Monday, August 15, the City Council passed the moratorium on a 6 to 3 vote that barred the City Planning Department from accepting or approving any pending applications for “Safe Outdoor Spaces”.  The moratorium, as well as pending repeal legislation, was a direct result of severe public backlash and outcry by city residents and neighborhood associations that refuse to support Safe Outdoor Spaces.  The August 15 vote was bipartisan.

Voting YES for the moratorium where Republicans Trudy Jones, Brook Bassan, Renee Grout, and Dan Lewis who were joined by Democrats Klarissa Peña and Louie Sanchez. Voting “NO” on the moratorium were Democrats Isaac Benton, Pat Davis and Tammy Fiebelcorn.  On August 26, Mayor Keller vetoed the moratorium.  Under the vetoed legislation, a complete moratorium would have been in effect until August 1, 2023, unless the City Council enacts a separate bill removing them totally from the zoning code.

It was City Councilor Brook Bassan who initially sponsored the safe outdoor space legislation that was first enacted and then reversed her support and then sponsored the moratorium on Safe Outdoor Spaces. Bassan moved for the veto override.  She said Albuquerque residents simply do not want Safe Outdoor Spaces. She attributed the opposition to the community’s other problems, saying so many people feel unsafe now that “we’re losing our compassion as a city.” Bassan in voting to override Keller’s veto said this:

“I believe Albuquerque is becoming a sanctuary for criminals. and I do not think it can continue. People do not feel safe and they’re pleading with us to help, they’re pleading with us for behavioral health treatment, drug addiction, they’re pleading with us to help with homelessness, I get that. I believe that we’re trying our best I believe that we’re really trying hard, but what we’re not doing is recognizing that even if every tool in the toolbox is what we have, maybe there’s only a right tool for the job. … Instead of adding salt to the wounds and not seeing improvement, and ignoring the public and what they’re asking for, let’s listen to them.”

Sara Fitzgerald, representing the Greater Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce, urged the council to move forward with the moratorium and said this:

“We don’t believe so-called safe outdoor spaces will remain safe or small for long and we believe the proliferation of homeless camps, however they are constituted,  will not make our streets safe and will hurt efforts to attract visitors, residents and employers alike.”

Mayor Keller’s office was quick to react to the vote by issuing the following statement:

“Albuquerque needs more tools, not less, to address the homelessness crisis while keeping our neighborhoods, parks and businesses safe. Council initially created Safe Outdoor Spaces as one tool among the many needed to help people move off of the streets, and this new approach should be allowed to go forward.”

SILENCE FOLLOWED BY PATHETIC EXPLANATION FOR VOTE CHANGE BY TRUDY JONES

During the September 8 city council meeting, discussion about the veto went on for more than an hour. The city council heard from more than 15 people who signed up to comment, and from several councilors who spoke both for and against Safe Outdoor Spaces.

What is interesting to note is that City Councilor Trudy Jones for more than a few days ignored or would not respond to calls and questions from her constituents who wanted to voice their support for the veto and who wanted to know how she intended to vote. During the September 8 City Council debate on the veto, Jones remained stoically silent and then when the time came to vote, she voted NO without any explanation for her reversal.

Councilor Jones in an interview after the vote was asked why she changed her vote and she had this to say:

“It’s the right thing to do. … Sometimes, along the line, you have to stick your neck out and do what’s right, not what is politically expected.”

The links to quoted news sources are here

https://www.abqjournal.com/category/news/abq-news

https://www.kob.com/new-mexico/albuquerque-city-council-fails-to-override-veto-of-safe-outdoor-spaces/

OTHER APPLICATIONS PENDING

According to the Planning Department’s website, there are 6  others that  are either under review or waiting for review.   There are proposals for Safe Outdoor spaces for 512 Wheeler SE and 715 Candelaria NE that are marked as “under review.”

Three applications are classified as “awaiting review” by the Planning Department and those locations listed are:

5915 Bluewater NW

2626 Arizona, NE

2401 University SE

Four of the 5 pending locations are church properties, with 715 Candelaria site being private property according to county property records.

The link to the city web site listing the applications is here:

https://cabq.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/768cc1b5e4404fa1a28db56c2019ee71

EIGHT APPEALS FILED ON THE ONE APPLICATION APPROVED

On August 8, the City Planning Department approved the Dawn Legacy Point application for a Safe Outdoor Space homeless campsite at 1250 Menaul, NE which will be used by woman who have been “victims of sex trafficking”.   The City Planning Department unilaterally reviewed the application behind closed doors with no notice to surrounding businesses or neighborhood associations, no public hearing and no public input. The application was “fast tracked” by the Planning Department to approve the application just 8 days before the City Council was scheduled to repeal the Safe Outdoor Spaces zoning use on August 16.

Less than a half mile from the vacant land and within walking distance from the property is Menaul School, a private boarding school for 6th to 12th graders. Directly across the street from the property is the T-Mobile Call Center and a Quality Inn & Suites. Going West on Menaul and one block from the property is Carrington College and two apartment complexes. Immediately East of the Freeway is the massive TA Travel Truck Stop on University that can accommodate parking of upwards of 150 semitrucks. Within law enforcement circles, the truck stop is known for prostitution and illicit drug activity. Immediate south of the truck stop on University Blvd is the Crown Plaza Hotel.

The vacant land borders   Sunset Memorial Park to the West.  It has been reported that workers daily patrol the cemetery grounds, monitoring the activity of homeless people who have taken to lounging in the various meditative shelters provided for grieving families. The homeless are known to use the various fountains throughout the park to wash themselves or use the fountains as a toilet, despite there being an easy-to-find portable toilets located at the northeast end of the park.

https://www.abqjournal.com/2523606/cemeteries-lament-bathing-camps-on-grounds.htm

As of September 7, eight separate appeals of the Dawn Legacy Point Safe Outdoor Spaces homeless tent encampment have been filed asking the City Planning Department to reverse its decision and deny the Safe Outdoor Space application of Dawn Legacy for 1250 Menaul. Appeals have been filed by the following parties:

  1. Martineztown Santa Barbara Neighborhood Association
  2. Menaul Middle School
  3. Life Roots
  4. Reuele Sun Corporation, a participant in the Menaul Redevelopment Area
  5. Crown Plaza Hotel, a participant in the Menaul Redevelopment Area
  6. T-Mobil Cell Phone Call Center
  7. Sunset Memorial Cemetery
  8. Greater Albuquerque Hotel and Lodging Association

The appeal has yet to be scheduled by the planning department.

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

Safe Outdoor Spaces are not the answer to the homeless crisis. “Safe Outdoor Spaces” will be a disaster for the city as a whole. Safe Outdoor Spaces are not the type of “tool” needed to solve a real crisis.  In reality, Safe Outdoor Spaces are a “political hatchet job”  that  will destroy neighborhoods, make the city a magnet for the homeless and destroy the city’s efforts to manage the homeless through housing. Tents are not a permanent solution for the homeless.

The homeless crisis will not be solved by the city, but it can and must be managed. Safe Outdoor Spaces represent a very temporary place to pitch a tent, relieve oneself, bathe and sleep at night with rules that will not likely be followed.

The answer is to provide the support services, including food and permanent lodging, and mental health care needed to allow the homeless to turn their lives around, become productive self-sufficient citizens and no longer dependent on relatives or others.

Hiding out and failing to even respond to constituent inquiries, phone call and emails by an elected official is the sign of sure political cowardice, which was exhibited by Trudy Jones.  With her reversal of her position on the Safe Outdoor Space moratorium, Republican City Councilor has lost virtually all of her credibility and public trust with her constituents because her failure to represent her constituent’s best interests.

City Councilor Trudy Jones is up for reelection next year for a 5th term and it is said she will not be running.  This likely explains her sudden “change in conscience” and new found courage to “stick her neck out.”

Mayor Tim Keller’s Damage Control Over Mishandling Of Homeless Crisis; Keller Reveals  Gibson Gateway Homeless Center Will Assist 1,000 Homeless A Day;  Shelter Will Be 330 Bed Homeless Shelter; Smaller “Multi Cite” Approach Ostensibly Abandoned 

On September 3, the Albuquerque Journal published a report entitled “ABQ Gateway Center likely to open some time this winter” with the article written by staff reporter Jessica Dyer.  The article makes the disclosure that Mayor Tim Keller had met with Albuquerque Journal editors and reporters on the Gibson Gateway Homeless Shelter and the city plans for converting the Gibson Medical Center into a homeless shelter.

The link to the entire unedited Journal article is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/2529657/abq-gateway-center-likely-to-open-some-time-this-winter-ex-mayor-say.html

The takeaways to the Journal article included the following major disclosures ostensibly made by Mayor Tim Keller to the Journal Editors and reporters thereby giving the paper and exclusive news report:

The first phase of the extensive construction and remodeling will cost an estimated $14 million.  The first phase will feature 50 emergency shelter beds exclusively for women. It also includes 20 beds for medical respite, which will provide people without other options, a place to recuperate from illness or injury. It also includes 20 beds for medically supervised sobering.

Albuquerque Family and Community Services Department Director Carol Pierce said the city selected the nonprofit Heading Home to run the 24/7 homeless shelter operation.  The facility services will concentrate on serving people picked up by APD police, or other first responders, but who do not belong in the emergency room or jail. That includes those who are intoxicated, dealing with mental illness or “down and outs” as they are commonly described by first responders.

According to Pierce and Mayor Tim Keller, it is the facility’s use as a “first responder dropoff”  that could have the most profound impact on the homeless community.  Pierce called the dropoff  “a huge piece of this puzzle” while Keller said the drop-off is a disproportionately important” part of the Gateway Center.

Keller had this to say:

“We have to have a 24/7 low-barrier, first-responder dropoff. … Until we have that, we’ll never see a significant difference in what’s happening throughout our system.”

The city estimates 1,500 people could go through the drop-off each year. The “dropoff  for the down and outs” will initially have 4 beds.  It is primarily imagined as a funnel into other services.  While that likely will include other on-site services, city officials say it will also help move people to a range of other destinations, including different local shelters, or even the Bernalillo County-run CARE Campus, which offers detoxification and other programs.  The city says it has several other components planned for the property.

Interior demolition and remodeling of the 572,000 square foot building has been going on for a number of months to prepare the facility for a homeless shelter.  According to the Journal report, the beds for 50 women as planned and for the first responder dropoff is to come online this winter. The city plans to launch other elements of the 24/7 shelter by next summer.

According to Keller, the city’s plan is to continue adding capacity, with ultimate plan to have a total of 250 emergency shelter beds, and 40 beds for medical sobering and 40 beds for medical respite beds for a total of 330 bed capacity.

Counting the other outside providers who lease space inside the building, city officials believe the property’s impact will be significant. In responding to questioning, Mayor Tim Keller said this:

“How many people did Lovelace help every day [when it was a hospital]? The answer is about a thousand …  We’re on track to do roughly the same thing.”

KELLER’S MISHANDLING OF HOMELESS CRISIS 

Since being sworn in as Mayor the first time on December 1, 2017, Mayor Tim Keller made it known that building a city operated homeless shelter was his top priority. Keller deemed that a 24-hour, 7 day a week temporarily shelter for the homeless critical towards reducing the number of homeless in the city. Keller’s plans were that the city owned shelter was to assist an estimated 300 homeless residents and connect them to other services intended to help secure permanent housing. The new facility was intended to serve all populations of men, women, and families. Further, the city wanted to provide a place anyone could go regardless of gender, religious affiliation, sobriety, addictions, psychotic condition or other factors.

The city facility was to have on-site case managers that would guide residents toward counseling, addiction treatment, housing vouchers and other available resources.  The new homeless shelter would replace the existing West Side Emergency Housing Center, the former jail on the far West Side. The west side facility was deemed unsustainable costing over $1 million in transportation costs a year for the homeless. The goal was for the new homeless shelter to provide first responders an alternative destination for the people they encounter known as the “down-and-out” calls.

Notwithstanding Mayor Keller’s desire for a city run shelter, there were many critics of the proposal. The critics included downtown business organizations such as the Greater Albuquerque Business Association (GABA) and neighborhood associations that mounted strong opposition. Critics argued against mixing populations and argued that a large facility would unduly burden any one neighborhood or business area of the city. Bernalillo County officials, homeless service providers and residents of neighborhoods surrounding potential locations seriously questioned the city’s efforts for a one centralized shelter.

KELLER FIRST ABANDONS GATEWAY CENTER CONCEPT

On Wednesday, May 7, 2020, Mayor Tim Keller conducted one of his daily briefings on the City’s response to the Corona Virus.  However, he dedicated most of the briefing to report on the “Gateway Center” Homeless Shelter. Participating in the briefing were City Council President Pat Davis, then County Commissioner Jim Collie and the city’s Chief Operating Officer Lawrence Rael.

The FACEBOOK video link to the press briefing is here:

https://www.facebook.com/MayorKeller/videos/290814465247439/UzpfSTEwNTQ4MTY4OTY6MTAyMjAwNDA5NDYxMDgwMTQ/

In a surprise announcement, Keller said that the city was abandoning the development concept of a single, 300-bed homeless shelter. He announced the city will be proceeding with a “multi-site approach” to the city’s homelessness crisis. Mayor Tim Keller went so far as to state that the 300 bed Gateway Center was “off the table”.

It was reported that a working group had been meeting regularly with the goal to reach a collective decision on how best to tackle both the city and county’s homeless problem. According to Keller, the City, Bernalillo County Commission, the University of New Mexico Hospital along with homeless service providers were pursuing other strategies to serve the upwards of 5,000 persons a year who are homeless in the city and county each year.

Keller said this during a media briefing:

“We are, I think, in a regrouping phase, but one I think is in many ways better with an eye toward a comprehensive solution and with an eye toward collaboration.”

Mayor Keller had made it known he wanted to start construction on the Gateway Center during the 2020 winter.  There was no clear timeline on the construction of any type of facility because the shift in strategy and because of the corona virus pandemic. Notwithstanding, Mayor Keller said the corona virus pandemic would not stop the city from developing some version of a Gateway Center plan.

Keller said the virus crisis has highlighted the need for an alternative to the city’s existing shelter, which is the former jail 20 miles from downtown and he said:

The coronavirus has also shown us how important this is. … The amount of funding and logistics we have to deal with going back and forth to the West Side … is extremely hard.”

According to Mayor Keller at the time the working group was to develop a “multi-site” model.  Such a model would still involve using the Gibson Medical Center.  The big difference was no 300-bed facility would be built.  Smaller facilities of between 50 to 100 scale would be considered along with other locations throughout the city. Regardless of the final strategy adopted by the working group, the $14 million approved by city voters was considered enough to move forward with a project, no doubt scaled back and at different locations.

https://www.abqjournal.com/1452203/city-exploring-new-path-to-gateway-center.html

PURCHASE OF GIBSON MEDICAL CENTER

Fast forward to April 6, 2021. Mayor Tim Keller held a press conference in front of the Gibson Medical Center, formerly the Lovelace Hospital, to officially announce the city had bought the massive 572,000 square-foot building that has a 201-bed capacity, for $15 million.  Keller announced that the massive facility would be transformed into a Gateway Center Homeless Shelter.

In making the announcement, Keller made it clear either way, like it or not, the site had been selected and the Gibson Medical facility would  be used to service the homeless population as a Gateway Center.  Keller said in part:

“The City of Albuquerque has officially bought the Gibson Medical Center, the cornerstone of our Gateway Center network. In total, this represents the largest capital investment that Albuquerque has ever made for the unhoused. We have roughly 5,000 homeless people. … what we’re looking at here is to move past this question of where … No matter how you feel about it, we’ve answered that question.”

After his April 6, 2021, press conference, Mayor Keller came under severe criticism for his failure to reach a consensus and take community input before the Gibson Medical Center was purchased for a homeless shelter. Residents of Elder Homestead, Parkland Hills, and Siesta Hills Neighborhood Associations led the efforts to aggressively oppose Keller’s plan to house hundreds of homeless residents in the District 6 Southeast Heights City Council District.  District 6 hosts more than 30 sites providing services to low-income and homeless residents. Area residents feared the clustering of unmanaged encampments and low rent by-the-night motels in the area will increase police calls for service and make things even worse for the area with a homeless shelter.

Fast-forward again to almost a year later to February 28, 2022.   It was reported that the city decided to launch the Gibson Gateway Center with 50 beds for women. It was ordinally reported that the city was scaling back the use of the facility as a direct result of neighborhood opposition and appeals filed to the zoning change for a homeless shelter.  In the past, the city said the Gibson Gateway Center was to be a 24/7 operation to aid anyone regardless of gender, religion or sobriety but announced it would start exclusively with women asserting that it made sense from a resource’s perspective.

On August 16, 2022, after a full 15 months of delay since the purchase of the sprawling Gibson Medical Center, it was announced the Keller Administration had finally secured the necessary zoning change to operate the facility as a 24-7 “homeless shelter.” The city went full speed ahead with the remodeling of the complex.

The Gibson Medical Center is currently home to 7 tenants, including three accredited hospitals, and various City of Albuquerque departments. Those tenants are:

AMG Specialty Hospital which is a long-term acute care hospital.

Haven Behavioral Hospital which is an   in-patient and out-patient treatments for individuals struggling with mental health and substance abuse issues.

Turquoise Lodge Hospital which is operated by the   NM Department of Health hospital and provides substance abuse treatment services to New Mexico residents.

Fresenius Kidney Care which provides education, support, and care for kidney health.

Zia Health Management which is an in-home medical care provider.

VIP Trauma Recovery Center, which is   a central hub to connect victims of violent crime to trauma recovery services.

The Encampment Outreach Team which secures ¼ mi radius around the facility  and connects individuals in encampments to service.

The city’s Violence Intervention Program offices have also moved into the facility.

The city’s website on the center reveals that, for Phase 1, “the Shelter and Engagement Center portion of Gateway will serve 50 single adult women-identifying individuals (on a yearly basis, up to 200 individual women). The First Responder Drop-Off will make up to 1,500 transports a year to needed services.”

KELLER CLOSES CORONADO PARK

On July 25, in a speech before a group of commercial and real estate developers,  Mayor Tim Keller announced closure of the unsanctioned homeless encampment at Coronado Park.  Keller said this:

“[The]situation is absolutely unacceptable, so we’re going to stop it. In August we’re closing Coronado Park. … It doesn’t matter if we know exactly what we’re doing next. It doesn’t matter exactly what the timing is or how we’re going to do it, but we have to do better than what’s happening at Coronado Park. There is a bed for every person [who stays at Coronado] to go. … The status quo will not stand … This remains a complex issue and while we work to determine what’s next for Coronado, we’ll keep stepping up to get folks connected to the right services and resources. …”

Mayor Keller was severely criticized for making the decision to close the park without conferring first and getting input from the surrounding neighborhoods, especially the Wells Park neighborhood, local businesses and stakeholders.  In particular, Keller was criticized for not having a plan on how to accomplish the closure or how to deal with the displacement of the homeless.

On August 18, Mayor Tim Keller held a press conference, along with other city officials,  in front of a vacant, clean up and fenced off Coronado Park and made the announcement that Coronado Park was officially closed to the public making good on a promise he made on June 27 to close the park by the end of August.  According to city officials, 75 to 120 people would camp out nightly at the park at Third Street and Interstate 40.  By Tuesday, August 17 when the park was closed and after weeks of what the city called intensive outreach” the number was down to 30 to 40 and 15 subsequently accepted transportation to a shelter.

Homeless campers were told of other housing options offered by the city. The city offered services and housing options to those using Coronado Park, including making limited property storage available to those who are interested or in need of it. Notwithstanding, many of the homeless displaced from Coronado Park  refused to accept any help of assistance from the city and  dispersed into the street and nearby neighborhoods

Mayor Keller Keller said the closure of Coronado Parke does not represent  “any kind of a comprehensive strategy” to resolve homelessness crisis. Keller said this:

The actions taken today by the City of Albuquerque are made necessary by the threats to public health, safety and the environment that this encampment has created. … Let no one think, however, that these actions represent a comprehensive strategy for resolving the problem of what we commonly call the homeless in Albuquerque or anywhere else in America.

Mayor Keller added that the yearslong “status quo” and public safety risks at the park including drug and human trafficking to those who lived at the park and those who provided them services had become “no longer acceptable.”

It has been reported that a very large percentage of the Coronado Park homeless suffer from mental illness and/ or drug addiction. Many of the homeless simply refuse “shelter housing” offered by the city, including the shelter housing in the west side 24-7 facility. Virtually none of the individuals who were displaced from Coronado Park were placed at the Gibson Gateway Homeless Shelter in that it has yet to be made fully operational.

CITY’S FINANCIAL COMMITMENT TO THE HOMELSS CRISIS

The Keller Administration has adopted a housing first policy when it comes to dealing with the homeless crisis which also includes funding provided to at least 10 service providers.

During the 2021 fiscal year that  ended  June 10, 2021, the Family and Community Services Department and the Keller Administration spent upwards of $40 Million to benefit the homeless or near homeless. The 2021 adopted city budget for Family and Community Services Department provides for mental health contracts totaling $4,329,452, and substance abuse contracts for counseling contracts totaling $2,586,302 and emergency shelter contracts totaling $5,688,094, affordable housing and community contracts totaling $22,531,752, homeless support services contracts.

Mayor Keller’s 2022-2023 approved budget that began on July 1, 2023, significantly increased the Family and Community Services budget by $24,353,064 to assist the homeless or near homeless by going from $35,145,851 to $59,498,915. A breakdown of the amounts to help the homeless and those in need of housing assistance contained in the 2022-2023 budget is as follows:

$3,773,860 total for mental health contracts 

$2,818,356 total substance abuse contracts for counseling, up by $288,680 from last year.

$42,598,361 total for affordable housing and community contracts with a major emphasis on permanent housing for chronically homeless.

$6,025,544 total for emergency shelter contracts

$4,282,794 total homeless support services, up $658,581 from last year.

The links  to the adopted 2021-2022 and 2022-23 approved budgets are here:

https://www.cabq.gov/dfa/documents/fy22-approved-budget-numbered-w-hyperlinks-final.pdf

https://www.cabq.gov/dfa/documents/fy23-proposed-final-web-version.pdf

CITIZEN SURVEY AND JOURNAL OPINION POLL ON  THE HOMELESS

In late August, a Citizens Satisfaction Survey commissioned by the city revealed that 70% feel the city  is failing in its response to the homeless.

An Albuquerque Journal poll published on August 31 also found that 77% of the general public believes the homeless crisis is very serious and 16% feel it is somewhat serious with a staggering total of 93%. The percentage of residents who gave the city positive scores for addressing homelessness had risen from 13% in 2019 to 29% in 2020 but it has now fallen by 20% and is  9% currently.

The link to the full survey is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/mayor/documents/final_coa-citizen-sat-2022.pdf

What is clear from the Citizen Perception Survey is that Albuquerque residents are dissatisfied with the Keller Administrations response to the homelessness crisis despite the city’s huge financial commitment to dealing with the homeless.  70% of citizens survey respondents rate the city poorly for its performance in dealing with the homeless crisis.  This includes 41% who gave city hall the lowest possible rating.  Meanwhile, only 9% gave the city’s homelessness response a favorable review. In other words, 7 times more people rate the city poorly on the issue than offer a positive assessment.

Mayor Keller for his part defended the poor survey results regarding the homeless and said this:

“[The survey] validates and gives a mandate to what we’re doing. … I hope that other policymakers hear that and support us, whether it’s the state Legislature or City Council. … This is how people feel and we’re coming at it with a lot of things. And what we need is for people to help make those real, so that those (survey) numbers will change.”

Mayor Keller has said that his Administration has adopted an “all the above” approach with dealing with the homeless crisis.

The link to the quoted news source is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/2529652/abq-residents-unhappy-with-citys-homelessness-response-survey-shows.html

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

It is so damn laughable that Mayor Tim Keller would actually say the results of the Citizen’s Satisfaction Survey “validates and gives a mandate to what where’re doing”.   It’s difficult to know if Keller actually believes the political “bull shit” rhetoric he tells the media or if he could not make up a better answer to a question asked of him.  Notwithstanding, it is clear that Keller’s “all the above approach”  thus far is simply not working.

Keller has very little to show for with the upwards of $100 million his administration has already spent over the last 2 years to deal with the homeless crisis.  The truth is the homeless crisis was created in part by Keller’s own actions in allowing Coronado Park to be used as de facto homeless encampment and not enforcing city ordinances prohibiting camping, trespassing and loitering.

Mayor Tim Keller’s special trip to the Albuquerque Journal Center to meet with the Journal Editors and reporters in order to give the Journal and exclusive story on updating what is happening with the Gibson Gateway Center can only be described as “damage control”.  It was Keller’s   attempt to pivot from a crisis he has created.  The damage control was no doubt the result of the following major factors converging over the last few weeks:

  1. The controversy surrounding the manner and method in which Keller order the closure of Coronado Park and admitting he had no long-term plan to deal with the crisis.
  2. The dramatic increase in the number and visibility of homeless and encampments throughout the city.
  3. The results of the Citizens Satisfaction Survey that 70% of the public feel the homeless crisis has been poorly handled by the Keller Administration.
  4. The 93% public opinion poll that feel the homeless crisis is very serious or somewhat serious.

The Alburquerque Journal rewarded Mayor Tim Keller for his exclusive story with a Sunday Journal editorial entitled “FULL SPEED AHEAD, Coronado Park Closure bolsters urgency for Gateway Center.”

The editorial said in part at the very end:

“Keller and his administration deserve credit for sticking with the Gateway initiative despite repeated hurdles. The project has been met with opposition since before Keller’s December 2020 announcement to buy the Gibson site.

… 

The city’s purchase of the former Lovelace Hospital for $15 million, finalized in April 2021, made it the largest city-owned facility outside of the Albuquerque International Sunport. Funding for the purchase and improvements includes $14 million from a voter-approved city bond question in 2019, $5 million from the city’s budget, about $1 million in past years’ state appropriations, $1 million from Bernalillo County bond proceeds and $500,000 in corporate contributions.

The money has been there to build an expansive homeless shelter and services facility. It’s just been a question of will and overcoming opposition from neighbors.

Albuquerque residents want something done. That’s clear from the Journal poll, in which 77% of likely voters described homelessness as a very serious problem, a sharp increase from four years ago when 54% of respondents described it as such. The overwhelming majority opinion was shared by Democrats and Republicans alike.

The closing of Coronado Park makes the need for solutions even more acute. The city should forge ahead and make the Gateway Center a success. It’s clear from the polling Albuquerque residents believe there’s no time to waste.”

It is now painfully obvious that what Mayor Tim Keller said on May 7, 2020 that the 300 bed Gateway Center was “off the table” and that the city was adopting a “multi cite” approach with smaller Gateway Homeless Shelters  of  50 or less was simply a ruse to get the appealing neighborhood associations off his back and to end the appeals.

What Keller announced to the Journal in his exclusive interview is that the Gibson Gateway Homeless Shelter will be a shelter that will have a total of 250 emergency shelter beds, plus 40 beds for medical sobering and 40 beds for medical respite beds for a total of 330 bed capacity shelter.  In other words, Tim Keller will be getting what he has wanted all along:  a 300-person shelter.  He will get what he has always wanted by being less than candid with the public, some would say sneaky, in order to get his way and be damned the neighborhoods.

What is needed is a far more targeted, surgical approach to address the mentally ill homeless and those suffering from substance abuse.   The mistake the Keller Administration is making is converting the Gibson Medical Center into a 24-7 homeless shelter for 300 plus when it should be a Homeless Hospital and Drug treatment center.

Much acrimony and a waste of time could have been avoided had Keller reached out and worked with the neighborhoods. Mayor Keller’s flip flopping back to a large single Gateway Homeless Shelter and away from a “multi-site approach” is likely due to political realities and damage control.

ABQ Citizen Perception Survey: 70% Feel City Doing Poor Job With Homeless; 52% Concerned Over City’s Direction; Measly 32% Feel City Responsive To Needs; Only 57% Feel Safe In Own Homes At Night; A Low 38% Feel APD Responding To Emergencies; 41% feel DOJ Reforms Have Had No Impact On APD

The City has released the City of Albuquerque Citizen Perception Survey dated August 2022. Each year, the City of Albuquerque commissions a survey to assess residents’ satisfaction with various City services and issues relating to crime, homelessness, and public safety.  During the last 3 years, the City’s response to the Corona Virus has been included. The study is required by City ordinance.  The link to the full survey is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/mayor/documents/final_coa-citizen-sat-2022.pdf

As has been the case for a number of years, the survey was conducted by Research and Polling which for decades has been considered the gold standard in New Mexico polling because of its consistent accuracy. A random sample of sample of 400 adult Albuquerque residents was interviewed by telephone by Research and Polling. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9% points.

This blog article is a deep dive review of the Citizen Perception Survey.  The major categories covered by the survey are:

Quality of Life

Personal Safety

Albuquerque Police Department

City Services

Homelessness

Covid Response

The edited summary results of the survey are as follows:

QUALITY OF LIFE

“… When residents were asked, in an unaided, open-ended manner, what they believe are the things that make Albuquerque special, the most common responses include [the following]”:

“Weather or climate:  31%

The culture:  26%

The diverse population:  18%

Friendly people:  15%

The Sandia Mountains: 15%

The food/cuisine:  13%

When asked unaided what values are most important to Albuquerque, residents responded as follows:

23% of survey respondents mention family

17% cited safety/security

12% cited pride in community and culture/preserving culture are each mentioned

11% cited diversity.

17% of residents did not offer a response.

Residents rated the quality of life in Albuquerque as follows:

48% of residents rate the quality of life in Albuquerque as being either good at 42% or excellent at 6%.  30% give a fair rating.

17% of residents feel the quality of life in Albuquerque is either poor at 12% or very poor at 5%.

Fewer than half the respondents, 48%, rate the city’s quality of life as “excellent” or “good,” down from 59% in 2020. Though “good” remains the most common rating at 42%, 17% rated it as “poor” or “very poor. The percentage of residents who rate the quality of life in Albuquerque as being either good or excellent has fallen from 54% in 2018, and 59% during the height of the pandemic in 2020 to 48% currently.

The survey results revealed that over half those surveyed, 52%, say they are concerned about the city’s direction. This compares to 43% who say they are hopeful. In the December 2020 survey, 50% said they were hopeful.  The percentage of residents who say they are hopeful about the direction of the City has fallen from 50% in December of 2020 to 43% in 2022.

Although 43% of residents say they are either somewhat hopeful with 34% or very hopeful with 9% about the direction of the City, just over % say they are either somewhat concerned at 30% or very concerned at 22%.

Anglo residents with 58% are more apt than Hispanics with 44% to rate the quality of life in Albuquerque as being either good or excellent.

It is not surprising that many residents are concerned about the direction of the City given the challenges currently being faced across the nation.

The survey noted that residents across the nation have concerns about where the country is heading as a whole.   [An example is] the website RealClear Politics calculates the average of different polls conducted among voters and adults across the nation and currently shows that an average of 74% believe the country is currently off on the wrong track, while an average of just 18% feel the country is heading in the right direction.

PERSONAL SAFETY

Crime and feelings of personal safety are important components to perceived quality of life.  Overall, 81% of Albuquerque residents say they feel in their neighborhood during the day.  (Very Safe at  51%  + somewhat at 30% = 81%)   However, the 81%  drops to 57%  felling safe at night. (Very safe at  24%  +  somewhat safe at 33%  =  57%.) In other words, there is a day and night different of  24%.   The gap has narrowed from  2020, when 68% reported feeling safe in their neighborhoods at night and only 24% said they felt unsafe

ALBUQUERQUE POLICE DEPARTMENT

“Residents were asked to rate how strongly they either agree or disagree with several statements relating to the Albuquerque Police Department (APD) using a 5-point scale where 5 is strongly agree and 1 is strongly disagree.  [The results of the survey were]:

53% of residents agree APD is respectful in its treatment of citizens as indicated by a score of 4 or 5.  This is up from 48% two years ago. That is down from 49% in 2019 and the lowest number for any survey going back to at least 2011.  20% strongly agreed compared to 15% who disagree, with a score of 1 or 2.

29% have neutral or mixed feelings about APD with a score of 3.

47% of residents agree APD reflects the values of the City’s residents, with 18% disagreeing and 30% have a neutral opinion of APD and 27% disagree.”

DRAMATIC INCREASES IN APD RESPONSE TIMES

According to the citizen’ survey, 38% of residents agree APD is doing a good job of addressing public safety issues and making quick responses to emergencies, while 30% have a neutral opinion and 27% disagree.  The 38% can only be considered very low in making quick responses to emergencies.”

The survey results on APD emergency response times is no surprise. There have been news investigative reports on APD’s response times for Priority 1 calls. Priority 1 calls include shootings, stabbings, armed robberies, sexual and aggravated assaults, domestic violence with weapons involved and home invasions.  According to the data, the time it takes officers to get to a crime scene stayed relatively consistent between January 2018 to May 2021 and was roughly between 9 and 12 minutes. In 2020, it was reported that there was a 93% increase in APD response time over a 9-year period. In 2018, clearing a scene ranged from an hour to an hour and 12 minutes. Fast forward to 2021 and APD was averaging more than 2 hours to write reports, gather evidence and interview witnesses, a full hour longer than three years ago.

https://www.kob.com/albuquerque-news/abq-4ward-examining-apds-response-times/6204745/

https://www.koat.com/article/apd-response-times-continue-to-climb/31028667

https://www.petedinelli.com/2020/02/24/93-increase-in-apd-911-response-times-since-2011-48-minutes-average-response-time-to-arrive-increase-despite-new-priority-call-system/

POLICE REFORMS

Since November 14, 2014, the City and the Albuquerque Police Department (APD) have been under a federal Court Approved Settlement Agreement with the appointment of a federal monitor after the Department of Justice (DOJ) found that APD engaged in a pattern of excessive force and deadly force. The DOJ found that engrained within APD was a “culture of aggression.” The City entered into a consent decree mandating 271 reforms which has resulted in  the city spending millions a year to implement the reforms and to train APD in constitutional policing practices.

In the the Citizen Perception Survey, residents were informed that the US Department of Justice has overseen a police reform program at APD.  They were  asked if they feel this has had a positive impact, negative impact, or no impact on the City of Albuquerque.  The results of the survey on APD were surprisingly as follows:

24% said they felt the reforms have had a positive impact on APD

14% said they felt the reforms have had a negative impact on APD

41% said they felt the reforms have had no impact on the on APD

20% said they did not have an opinion

CITY SERVICES

The percentage of residents who feel Albuquerque City Government is responsive to community needs has dropped from 48% observed in 2020, which was an all-time high dating back to 2011, to 32% a 17% drop.

Specifically, 32% agree Albuquerque City Government is responsive to community needs, 38% have a neutral opinion, 28% disagree that City Government is responsive.

These results are similar to those observed in previous studies dating back to 2011 with the exception of the 2020 study which saw a big spike in positive reviews. The 2020 results may have been an anomaly given that so much attention was being given to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated shutdowns coupled with the fact that the majority of residents give City Government high marks for the City’s response to COVID.

Residents were asked to rate how well Albuquerque City Government is handling specific issues using a five-point scale where five is excellent and one is very poor.

47% give City Government positive marks with a score of 4 or 5 when it comes to maintaining city parks and open space areas.

34% give positive ratings supporting renewable and clean energy programs.

34% give positive ratings for maintaining roads and streets

32% give positive ratings for supporting the local economy

THE HOMELESS

“The issue of homelessness continues to be a major challenge in Albuquerque as it is in many other cities.

70% feel the City is doing a poor job of addressing homelessness

9% of residents give City Government positive marks for addressing the homelessness issue

20% give a mixed or neutral rating.

The percentage of residents who give the City positive scores for addressing homelessness had risen from 13% in 2019 to 29% in 2020 but it has now fallen by 20% and is  9% currently.

Although there has been a lot of attention focused on homelessness in the news, % of Albuquerque residents say they are aware the city is the Gateway Center.  The shelter will be a 24/7 shelter providing to women experiencing homelessness during the first phase of its operation.”

RACE RELATIONS

59% of City residents believe relations between different cultures and racial backgrounds are either excellent, 10%, or good, 49%, while 31% say relations are fair. Only 7% of residents feel relations between people of different cultures and racial backgrounds in Albuquerque are poor. Demographically, 66% of Anglos are slightly more likely than Hispanics at 53% to rate relations as excellent or good.

COVID RESPONSE

As mentioned above, most Albuquerque residents feel City Government has done a good job responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, when asked to rate how well Albuquerque City Government has handled the Coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic, three-in-five residents surveyed give positive scores (26% give an excellent rating). In comparison, 20% are critical of the way the pandemic has been handled by City Government, while 16% give a neutral or mixed rating. Overall, the percentage of residents who give City Government positive reviews for the way it has handled the pandemic has improved slightly from 54% in December of 2020, to 60% currently.

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

There are 5 major areas of concern that have been red flagged by the 2022 Citizen Perception Survey that must be very disturbing to Mayor Tim Keller and his Administration.  Those areas of concern are

  1. People do not feel safe in their own homes
  2. The Homeless crisis
  3. Dissatisfaction with city’s response to community needs
  4. Direction the city is going
  5. APD Police reforms have accomplished little

 PEOPLE DO NOT FEEL SAFE IN THEIR OWN HOMES AT NIGHT

One of the most disturbing statistics from the Citizen’s Survey is that only 57% of those surveyed felt safe at night in their own homes.  It likely that 57% is on the very low side. At the core of citizens do not feel safe in their homes at night is the City’s high violent crime and homicide rates.

A recent Journal poll found that 82% of the public feel that crime is very serious, 14% said crime is somewhat serious for a staggering total of 96%.  Albuquerque has seen a major spike in violent crime and the rates are some of the highest in the country.

In the last 3 years, Albuquerque has had a breaking number of homicides each year.  In 2021 the city had 117 homicides.  As of August 30, APD reports that there have been 88 homicides, with the city well on it way to breaking the 2021 all time record.

apd-homicide-list-for-web-site-as-of-02sep2022.pdf (cabq.gov)

https://www.abqjournal.com/2528871/ex-those-most-likely-to-vote-also-worry-about-the-economy-and-public.html

THE HOMELSESS CRISIS

The Citizens Survey of 70% feeling the city is failing in its response to the homeless is likely inaccurate and the public attitude has only gotten worse. A recent Journal poll found that 77% of the general public believes the homeless crisis is very serious and 16% feel it is somewhat serious with a staggering total of 93%.

What is clear from the Citizen Perception Survey is that Albuquerque residents are dissatisfied with the Keller Administration’s response to the homelessness crisis despite the city’s huge financial commitment to dealing with the homeless.   The survey confirms that residents feel Mayor Tim Keller and his admiration are failing.

70% of citizens survey respondents rate the city poorly for its performance in dealing with the homeless crisis.  This includes 41% who gave city hall the lowest possible rating.  Meanwhile, only 9% gave the city’s homelessness response a favorable review. In other words, 7 times more people rate the city poorly on the issue than offer a positive assessment.

This is a dramatic change from 2020 when only 36% gave the city poor marks for how it was tackling homelessness, including just 22% who offered the worst rating, while 29% provided a positive assessment.  There has been a dramatic 20% drop in how people feel the city is dealing with homeless from 29% in 2020 to 9% in 2022.

The 9% approval rating in the citizens survey   should be very alarming to Mayor Tim Keller and his administration.  Since day one from becoming Mayor on December 1, 2018, Mayor Keller has made dealing with the homeless a major cornerstone of his administration so much so that he advocated the construction of a 24-7 homeless shelter.  This ultimately resulted in the purchase of the massive 560, 000 square foot Gibson Medical center, formerly the Lovelace Hospital, for $15 million. The facility is being renovated and it is anticipated to open in the winter of 2022 as a 24/7 shelter.

The Keller Administration has adopted a housing first policy when it comes to dealing with the homeless crisis which also includes funding provided to at least 10 service providers. This past fiscal year 2021 ending June 10, 2021, the Family and Community Services Department and the Keller Administration have spent upwards of $40 Million to benefit the homeless or near homeless. The 2021 adopted city budget for Family and Community Services Department provides for mental health contracts totaling $4,329,452, and substance abuse contracts for counseling contracts totaling $2,586,302 and emergency shelter contracts totaling $5,688,094, affordable housing and community contracts totaling $22,531,752, homeless support services contracts.

Mayor Keller’s 2022-2023 approved budget significantly increases the Family and Community Services budget by $24,353,064 to assist the homeless or near homeless by going from $35,145,851 to $59,498,915. A breakdown of the amounts to help the homeless and those in need of housing assistance contained in the 2022-2023 budget is as follows:

$3,773,860 total for mental health contracts (Budget page105.)

$2,818,356 total substance abuse contracts for counseling (Budget page 106.), up by $288,680 from last year.

$42,598,361 total for affordable housing and community contracts with a major emphasis on permanent housing for chronically homeless.

$6,025,544 total for emergency shelter contracts (Budget page 102.).

$4,282,794 total homeless support services, up $658,581 from last year.

The links  to the adopted 2021-2022 and 2022-23 approved budgets are here:

https://www.cabq.gov/dfa/documents/fy22-approved-budget-numbered-w-hyperlinks-final.pdf

https://www.cabq.gov/dfa/documents/fy23-proposed-final-web-version.pdf

Mayor Keller for his part defended the poor survey results regarding the homeless and said this:

“[The survey] validates and gives a mandate to what we’re doing. … I hope that other policymakers hear that and support us, whether it’s the state Legislature or City Council. … This is how people feel and we’re coming at it with a lot of things. And what we need is for people to help make those real, so that those (survey) numbers will change.”

Mayor Keller has said that his Administration has adopted an “all the above” approach with dealing with the homeless crisis. It laughable that Keller would say the survey “validates and gives a mandate to what where’re doing”.  It’s difficult to know if Keller actually believes the rhetoric he tells the media. It is clear that Keller’s “all the above approach” is simply not working and he has very little to show for with the millions already spent. What is needed is a more targeted, surgical approach, to address the mentally ill and those suffering from substance abuse.

The link to the quoted news source is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/2529652/abq-residents-unhappy-with-citys-homelessness-response-survey-shows.html

DISSATISFACTION WITH CITY REPONSE TO COMMUNITY NEEDS

The percentage of residents who feel Albuquerque City Government is responsive to community needs has dropped from 48% observed in 2020, which was an all-time high dating back to 2011, % a disturbing 17% decline.   This is very difficult to accept, let alone understand, given that Mayor Tim Keller has submitted, and the City Council has approved in 2 consecutive years the 2  largest city budgets in its history, one for $1.1 Billion in 2021 and the other for $1.4 billion in 2022.

On May 17, 2021, the Albuquerque City Council voted unanimously to approve the 2021-2022 city budget of $1.2 billion, $711.5 million of which is the General Fund. The General Fund covers basic city services such as police protection, fire and rescue protection, the bus system, street maintenance, weekly solid waste pickup, all city park maintenance, city equipment, animal control, environmental health services, the legal department, risk management, and payroll and human resources

On May 16, 2022, the Albuquerque City Council approved the 2022-2023 city budget. The overall budget approved by the city council was for $1.4 Billion with $841.8 representing the general fund spending with an increase of $127 million, or 17.8%, over the 2021-2022 c budget of $1.2 Billion.

The link to city approved budgets is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/dfa/budget/annual-budget

DIRECTION THE CITY IS GOING

Another very disturbing trend revealed by the survey is that residents show less satisfaction with current quality of life in the city and there is growing concern about Albuquerque’s future.  Although 50% of those surveyed believe Albuquerque is doing “about the same” as other cities dealing with problems and carrying out its responsibilities, the survey generally shows worsening perceptions of life in the city.

The percentage of residents who rate the quality of life in Albuquerque as being either good or excellent has fallen from 54% in 2018 to 48% in 2022.  The percentage of residents who say they are hopeful about the direction of the City has fallen from 50% in December of 2020 to 43% in 2022.

Although 43% of residents say they are either somewhat hopeful with 34% or very hopeful with 9% about the direction of the City, just over % say they are either somewhat concerned at 30% or very concerned at 22%.

POLICE REFORMS VIEWED AS NOT ACCOMPLISNG MUCH AFTER MILLIONS SPENT

A plurality, or 41%, of those surveyed said the ongoing U.S. Department of Justice-mandated reform effort within APD has had no impact, while 24% say it has been positive and 14% say it has been negative.  There is no getting around it, even with the recent news that APD has improved in compliance levels with all of the reforms, APD still has a major image problem.

Over the last 7 years, the DOJ reforms have place great emphasis on implementing constitutional policing practices, increased training and crisis intervention and implemented community policing councils and a Citizens Police Oversight agency. Despite all the efforts made, an astonishing 41% of those feel the reforms have had no impact on APD.

CONCLUSION

Mayor Tim Keller has been Mayor now for 5 years. He has won both of his elections in a land slide.   After a full 5 years in office, Mayor Keller’s bright new sheen has worn off and the second term curse has begun with Keller’s mishandling of the homeless crisis. The ultimate question is if people feel the city is better off today than they were 5 years ago since Tim Keller took office on December 1, 2017?  The likely answer is NO with the city experiencing record breaking violent crime rates and the homeless crisis only getting worse.

Mayor Keller has already said privately to more than a few that he intends run for a 3rd term as Mayor in 2025 or perhaps run for Governor in 2026. If Tim Keller does indeed have higher ambitions, he needs to do a far better job than he is doing now.  It’s not at all likely Tim Keller will be winning any more elections in a landslide given his performance as Mayor.