On August 22, a petition calling for Mayor Tim Keller to terminate Chief Harold Medina began to circulate on the internet and by email. The petition was started by Citizen of Albuquerque using a free on-line petition organization identified as “change.org.”  

Change.org is a website that allows users to create and sign petitions to raise awareness and influence decision-makers on social causes. Change.org does solicit contributions but does not require them to sign the petition. The site is owned by a nonprofit foundation and is a for-profit public benefits corporation. Change.org claims to be the world’s largest nonprofit-owned platform for social change.  Users can create petitions on a variety of topics, including general justice, economic justice, criminal justice, human rights, education, environmental protection, animal rights, health, and sustainable food.  The link to change.org is here:

https://www.change.org/login_or_join?redirectTo=%2Fu%2F1348170913

The petition has a photo of APD Chief Harold Medina and provides an update on the status of the number of those who have signed the petition. Citizens of Albuquerque can be considered as those who have signed the petition. As of September 30, a total 309 people have signed the petition.

The petition states:

“WHY THIS PETITION MATTERS

Started by Citizen of Albuquerque

As citizens of Albuquerque, New Mexico, we hold our public officials to a high standard of professionalism and integrity. Regrettably, one among them, Harold Medina, current Chief of the Albuquerque Police Department, has recurrently demonstrated his unsuitability for such an esteemed position. Cambridge’s Policing Project highlights that ethical leadership is integral to enhancing departmental functioning and citizen trust, which we believe is currently lacking under Medina’s leadership (International Association of Chiefs of Police, Policing Project).

His admissions concerning his crash, that seriously injured a citizen of Albuquerque, show that he is only concerned for himself and not the citizens he is sworn to serve. He was recorded during a citywide briefing attempting to downplay his actions and said that the investigation was to simply “appease everyone.” Furthermore, he was exposed during an internals affairs investigation saying that he intentionally did not turn on his camera so he would not incriminate himself. Is that really acceptable for someone who is supposed to be the pinnacle of public servant? The citizens of Albuquerque deserve better!

Mayor Keller, our demands rest on a pressing need for the termination of Harold Medina from his role as chief for the greater good of our community. By signing this petition, we take a collective step towards a safer and better governed Albuquerque. Sign this petition today and be part of the change we need.”

The link to the petition and to sign it is here:

https://www.change.org/p/mayor-keller-terminate-chief-harold-medina

OPEN LETTER TO MAYOR TIM KELLER

On September 27 the following email to Mayor Tim Keller was forwarded to www.PeteDinelli.com and ostensibly has been sent to Mayor Keller for his response:

EDITOR’S NOTE: Direct contact was made by www.PeteDinelli.com with the sender of the correspondence to Mayor Keller.  The identity of the author of the correspondence to Mayor Keller has been identified as a retired APD Police Officer who asked to remain anonymous and is considered as a confidential source.  The confidential source stated the media has ignored several requests for news coverage as have the city councilors.

Mayor Keller,

As an elected official it is your responsibility to serve the best interests of the public. Your service as mayor to Albuquerque is a privilege and is not your right. With that said, I wish to address the ongoing concerns many citizens have over the continued appointment of Chief Harold Medina. I am sure you aware that an official Brady complaint was lodged against Medina for “Abuse of Authority.” While this could apply to many instances during his tenure, it stems from his recent chicanery surrounding his admission that he intentionally violated state statutes (New Mexico Statutes Chapter 29. Law Enforcement § 29-1-18) concerning his body camera during his reckless crash that seriously injured a citizen of Albuquerque (the other driver sustained a broken collarbone, broken shoulder blade, eight broken ribs, and a collapsed lung and was taken to the hospital in critical condition). 

Considering the nature of this incident, I find it relevant to point out the many incredulous administrative steps that were taken to allow this travesty of justice to occur. Despite the excuses your administration made for Medina, his crash was preventable. To clarify, even if he and his wife were in danger, that does not authorize him to engage in reckless behavior placing others in peril to protect himself. The fact is that he acted cowardly in a situation he is supposedly trained and experienced to handle (I myself have decades’ worth of law enforcement experience that include multiple situations of being in mortal danger). There was no excuse to recklessly speed through a red light with no regard for anyone else. 

 After this preventable incident occurred, the proper course of action was to have a third-party law enforcement agency conduct the investigation. How is it possible for a subordinate to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into their boss? It is not. Furthermore, Chief Medina was recorded by a member of his own department saying that they were doing this investigation to “appease everyone.” Not only was his attitude irreverent, but it is also demonstrative of his cavalier thoughts and actions toward his responsibilities to the public. 

 When this sham of an investigation was completed, Medina evaded actual consequences with nothing more than two letters of reprimand. If any other officer admitted, in an internal affairs interview, that they intentionally did not turn on their camera to protect themselves, from liability, they would have been facing harsher disciplinary measures up to and including termination. I say this knowing that politically it would be hazardous for the department to allow an admission like this to go unchallenged, considering the DWI scandal hanging over your and Medina’s head. Ultimately, Albuquerque’s “top cop” should have been held to the highest standard and terminated for his behavior.

 Mr. Mayor I would like to remind you that under the city’s current Merit System Ordinance, Section 301.1; it is Chief Medina’s and your responsibility to remember that your “first obligation is to the general public’s safety and well-being.”  Furthermore, under Section 301.3; “Employees shall in all instances maintain their conduct at the highest personal and professional standards in order to promote public confidence and trust in the City.…” Considering the intent of this ordinance, I would argue that these sections have been violated. 

 For the sake of brevity, I have chosen to focus on this incident alone, although there are many others where Medina and his staff have violated other Merit System Ordinances. I believe it prudent that I share a petition that is circulating (and still growing) demanding that you carry out your responsibility to the public and terminate Chief Harold Medina. For your contemplation and consideration, I have included the links to the petition, the Brady complaint, and a news article relevant to your reelection.

  With great concern,

 Citizens of Albuquerque

 [The following links are provided]

Petition – https://www.change.org/terminateharoldmedina

Brady List – https://giglio-bradylist.com/individual/harold-%20medina

Reelection Controversies Article – https://www.koat.com/article/albuquerque-mayor-keller-2025-campaign/62087340

RESULTS OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATIONS

On April 3 it was reported to the City Council that the APD Crash Review Board voted unanimously to deem Medina’s crash “non-preventable” and therefore Chief Medina was not charge charged with any traffic violations by APD.

On July 18, the city announced that the Internal Affairs investigation and disciplinary review of APD Chief Harold Medina actions during the February 17 car crash resulted in two “letters of reprimand” issued to Medina by Superintendent of Police Reform Eric Garcia.  Chief Harold Medina was found to have violated APD policy by failing to safely operate his vehicle while on duty and not turning on his lapel camera as required by APD standard operating procedures. The letters of reprimand were placed in Medina’s personnel file.  No other disciplinary action was taken. APD spokesman Gilbert Gallegos said Medina accepted the discipline and signed the letters of reprimand.

NEW MEXICO STATUTE MANDATING ACTIVATION OF LAPEL CAMERAS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT

Chief Medina publicly admitted in news interviews that he did not have his body camera on during the February 17 incident and car crash and for that reason he referred the matter to APD Internal Affairs.

It was in 2020 that the New Mexico legislature enacted New Mexico Statute § 29-1-18 which mandates the use of body cameras by law enforcement.  The statute reads as follows:

“A.  A law enforcement agency shall require peace officers the agency employs and who routinely interact with the public to wear a body-worn camera while on duty …. . Each law enforcement agency subject to the provisions of this section shall adopt policies and procedures governing the use of body-worn cameras, including:

1. Requiring activation of a body-worn camera whenever a peace officer is responding to a call for service or at the initiation of any other law enforcement or investigative encounter between a peace officer and a member of the public;
2. Prohibiting deactivation of a body-worn camera until the conclusion of a law enforcement or investigative encounter;
3. Requiring that any video recorded by a body-worn camera shall be retained by the law enforcement agency for not less than one hundred twenty days; and
4. Establishing disciplinary rules for peace officers who… fail to operate a body-worn camera in accordance with law enforcement agency policies …

B.  Peace officers who fail to comply with the policies and procedures required to be adopted pursuant to Subsection A of this section may be presumed to have acted in bad faith and may be deemed liable for the independent tort of negligent spoliation of evidence or the independent tort of intentional spoliation of evidence.”

There are serious consequences for a law enforcement officer’s failure to abide by the statute. Under the statute, per Section 29-1-18(C), a law enforcement officer “may be presumed to have acted in bad faith and may be deemed liable for the independent tort of negligent spoliation of evidence or the independent tort of intentional spoliation of evidence.”

 CAR ACCIDENT VICTIM FILE SUIT

On August 26,  Todd Perchert, the victim of the February 17 car crash caused APD Police Chief Harold Medina, filed in the 2nd Judicial District Court in Albuquerque a 20 page personal injury lawsuit naming as Defendants the  City of Albuquerque and APD Chief Harold Medina.  The lawsuit alleges negligence and that “Defendant Harold Medina battered and/or assaulted Todd Perchert by driving at a high rate of speed and violently colliding with Plaintiff’s vehicle.” The civil complaint outlines personal injury damages, alleges violations of the New Mexico Tort Claims Act, and Violations of the New Mexico Civil Rights Act and alleges “Loss of Consortium.” Perchert’s wife, Danielle, is also suing. The Percherts are requesting a jury trial.

The Percherts are claiming Chef Medina violated multiple state laws and department operating procedures when the crash happened. They also say the city is responsible because it was negligent in hiring, training and supervising Medina. The 20-page lawsuit also states Todd Perchert is unable to work, and has “suffered damage to the value and enjoyment of his life” because of his injuries from the crash.

Todd Perchert is seeking damages for the following personal injuries sustained in the car crash:

• Broken collarbone and shoulder blade
• 8 broken ribs (Reconstructed with titanium plates after surgery)
• Collapsed lung
• Lacerations to left ear and head
• Multiple gashes to face
• Seven-hour surgery
• Hospitalized with an epidural painkiller and chest tube for nearly a week

 The civil litigation is pending. If the case is not settled and  proceeds to a jury trial, it’s very likely that a jury will render a significant judgment against the city and Chief Medina. Given all that has been reported in the media, including incriminating statements by Chief Medina, his admissions of liability and admissions against interests, as well as the videos of the car crash, the case will be extremely hard for the city to defend. Medina has caused the city and the citizens of Albuquerque major exposure to financial liability because of his actions, statements and willful failures to follow APD standard operating procedures.  Because his acts were “official” the city and taxpayers will be required under the New Mexico Tort claims act to defend and indemnify him for his liability.

CITY COUNCILOR LOUIE SANCHEZ FILES COMPLAINT AGAINST CHIEF MEDINA

On August 26, 2024, in a press release, it was announced that District 1 City Councilor Louie Sanchez has filed a complaint with the New Mexico Department of Public Safety (DPS) to investigate potential misconduct by Chief Medina at the scene of the Chief’s February 2024 automobile crash.

The press release reads in full as follows:

“For Immediate Release: August 26, 2024

Councilor Sanchez Files Complaint with NM Department of Safety Against APD Chief Medina Chief’s actions on accident scene appear to be in violation of state law.

 “[Albuquerque City] Councilor Sanchez submitted a formal request for a state investigation of the conduct of Chief Medina at the scene of the February accident.  The request, known as a LEA-90, comes in the light of Medina’s admission to APD Internal Affairs that he intentionally and purposefully did not activate his body-worn camera when involved in police action. Such action by Medina appears to violate Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s 2020 public safety accountability bill which requires police officers to wear the body worn cameras and record encounters with citizens.

The Law Enforcement Training Act (Section 29-7-1 through 29-7-16), grants the Law Enforcement Academy Board of Directors the power and duty to refuse, suspend, or revoke the certification of a police officer or telecommunicator for just cause as provided for under the Law Enforcement Training Act and Board Rules.

“As the chief law enforcement officer of the state’s largest police department, the chief should hold himself to a higher standard than that of his rank and file, not lower. We are at a crossroads where officer morale is at an all-time low and public trust might even be lower,” Councilor Sanchez stated. “Chief Medina’s actions are the type of actions that brought the U.S. Department of Justice oversight in the first place. Here, he openly disregarded state law.”

It is imperative to uphold the highest standards of integrity and professionalism within our law enforcement agencies, and this investigation aims to address any concerns or allegations with the utmost seriousness.

The request for investigation has been submitted to the Department of Public Safety, Law Enforcement Academy and will be conducted by the LEA Board of Directors. The findings of this investigation will be made public to ensure that our community is kept informed throughout the process.”

The link to the press release is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/council/find-your-councilor/district-1/news/councilor-sanchez-files-complaint-with-nm-department-of-safety-against-apd-chief-medina#:~:text=ALBUQUERQUE%20%E2%80%93%20District%201%20City%20Councilor,Chief’s%20February%202024%20automobile%20crash.

According to former Attorney General Hector Balderas, anyone can submit an LEA-90, or misconduct form, to the LEA Board.

 COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

There is absolutely no doubt that APD Chief Medina still enjoys 100% confidence of Mayor Tim Keller despite all of Medina’s admissions of violating standard operating procedures.  After the accident caused by Medina, both Mayor Keller and Chief Medina had the gall to declare it was Medina who was the victim the car accident Medina caused. Medina declared his 5^th Amendment right against self-incrimination when he was asked about his failure to activate his lapel camera.  Keller went so far to say “[Chief Medina is] arguably the most important person right now in these times in our city.” 

The preferential treatment that Chief Medina has been given by Mayor Keller and Medina’s Internal Affairs management team when it comes to investigating the car accident caused by his reckless driving that almost killed a private citizen is obscene and an embarrassment. Chief Medina violated multiple state laws and department operating procedures when the crash happened that normally would get any other police officer fired.  Chief Medina should have been charged with reckless driving but instead was given a slap on the wrist in the form of letters of reprimand by his Internal Affairs department.

There has been no announcement on the status of the complaint filed against APD Chief Medina by City Councilor Louie Sanchez with the Law Enforcement Academy Board. Should the board in fact find that Chief Medina intentionally violated state law by not activating his lapel camera, the Board could suspend or terminate Medina’s law enforcement certification. Maybe then and only then will Mayor Keller take appropriate action to hold Chief Medina accountable for his conduct, thank him for his service and ask him for his resignation.

The links to related Dinelli blog articles are here:

APD Chief Harold Medina Pleads 5th Amendment Right Against Self Incrimination In Car Crash Investigation; Medina Found He Intentionally Did Not Have Lapel Camera On; Given New $100,000 Ford Expedition; Citizen’s Petition Seeking Medina’s Termination Circulates

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/07/22/apd-chief-harold-medina-given-slap-on-the-wrist-for-car-crash-he-caused-critically-injuring-another-given-two-written-reprimands-no-charges-filed-despite-elements-of-carel/

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/08/28/victim-of-car-crash-caused-by-apd-chief-harold-medina-files-personal-injury-lawsuit-to-recover-damages-extent-of-personal-injuries-coupled-with-medinas-conduct-admissions-and-video-of-crash-wi/

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/08/27/complaint-filed-against-apd-chief-medina-with-nm-department-of-public-safety-by-councilor-louie-sanchez-after-medina-admits-he-intentionally-did-not-turn-on-lapel-camera-after-car-crash-medina-may-be/

On September 28 and 29, the following news story was published by the Albuquerque Journal:

“The Albuquerque Journal’s editor in chief is on leave after pleading guilty to a shoplifting incident at a Walmart in Rio Rancho last month.

Patrick Ethridge, 47, was charged with misdemeanor shoplifting on Aug. 24.

Ethridge pleaded guilty on Wednesday morning and Rio Rancho Municipal Court Judge Michael Gibson immediately sentenced him to 90 days in jail, with 80 days suspended. 

Ethridge is currently serving a 10-day sentence at the Sandoval County Detention Center. Under New Mexico law, a petty misdemeanor is punishable by up to six months in jail and/or a $500 fine.

Ethridge’s attorney did not respond to a request for comment.

“I am saddened to announce that, effective immediately, I am putting our Executive Editor, Patrick Ethridge, on a mandatory leave of absence,” Journal Publisher William P. Lang said in a statement Friday. “We don’t know or understand all the details yet, but were shocked to learn that he has been charged with shoplifting and sentenced by a Municipal Judge in Rio Rancho, where he is currently serving ten days.”

Lang added, “At the Albuquerque Journal, we believe in being transparent, and holding people to a higher standard, including ourselves. We appreciate your support and concern, and will report more information when it is clear to us.”

Ethridge became executive editor and vice president of the Journal on May 30, 2023.

With 26 years of experience with newspapers, Ethridge’s most recent role before the Journal was as editor and publisher of the Beatrice Daily Sun in Nebraska.

On Aug. 24, Rio Rancho police responded to a shoplifting at the Walmart Supercenter at Unser and Southern, according to a criminal complaint filed in Municipal Court. Store security told police that two boys were “acting disorderly around the store, knocking over displays and concealing items.”

Police said officers identified the boys as Ethridge’s sons and found the family in the self-checkout area and “advised them of the allegations.” Officers watched surveillance video, which showed the boys opening energy drinks, drinking some and putting them on the shelf again.

While reviewing the footage, officers saw Ethridge “skip scanning” items — which means pretending to scan items through self-checkout without paying, according to the complaint. Officers said Ethridge would “scan some items and not others.”

“The sum of all unpaid merchandise, including the energy drinks the boys consumed, was $104.20,” according to police.

On Thursday, Ethridge’s attorney, filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea and said he had initially pleaded guilty “wanting to get this case over with as expeditiously as possible” and “in spite of the fact that he did not intentionally steal any items.”

In the motion, Ethridge said he didn’t know the items had not been scanned and “asked to pay for the unscanned items.”

“The store refused to do this and pressed charges of shoplifting against Mr. Ethridge instead,” according to the motion.”

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/albuquerque-journal-editor-on-leave-after-shoplifting-charge-in-rio-rancho/article_fa04ec36-7d24-11ef-9d33-0bb7c1229ce8.html

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

This entire news story can be described as somewhat bizarre on a number of levels.

It was reported that Patrick Ethridge  was shopping at a Walmart with his two sons on August 24 when Walmart surveillance video showed the sons were  “acting disorderly” including opening energy drinks and then placing them back on the shelf. There is no indication that the sons were detained nor charged nor are their ages disclosed.   When Ethridge went to check out the store, he supposedly failed to scan a number of the items. There is no reporting on exactly what was being stolen such as food versus clothing. When confronted by store security, he offered to pay for the items but Walmart security decline and he was arrested on a charge of shoplifting of $100 or less.

Under New Mexico law, shoplifting is a petty misdemeanor and is punishable by up to six months in jail and/or a $500 fine. Rarely are people jailed for a first offense, if at all, for shoplifting and they are usually placed on probation with a suspended sentence. Ethridge has no prior convictions and the offense is a “none violent crime”.

Ethridge is  represented by prominent  criminal defense attorney Todd Bullion who was co-counsel with criminal defense  attorney Jason Bowles. The attorneys defended Hannah Gutierrez Reed, the armorer on the movie set of Rust who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in jail in the fatal shooting of a cinematographer by Alec Baldwin on the Rust western movie set

When Ethridge pleaded guilty to the charge before Rio Rancho Municipal Court Judge Michael Gibson he was sentenced to a shocking 10 days for the petty misdemeanor. Judge Gibson is considered a no nonsense Judge who imposes stiff sentences.

According to the news report, Ethridge initially pleaded guilty “wanting to get this case over with as expeditiously as possible” and “in spite of the fact that he did not intentionally steal any items.”  No details have been given as to exactly why no plea deal was struck for a suspended sentence nor why such a harsh sentence was imposed.  Was a guilty plea entered to protect his sons to any degree? A Motion to Withdraw the guilty plea has  now been filed while Ethridge sits in jail.

The biggest question that has been raised is how did the shoplifting arrest of the top editor of the Albuquerque  Journal stay secret for so long?  The arrest occurred on August 24, but it was not reported on by the Albuquerque Journal until September 28.  Additionally, the local TV news stations have yet to post any news story on their internet web pages.

There is little doubt that the arrest and jailing of Patrick Ethridge is a major embarrassment to the Albuquerque Journal. The question that remains is will he step down or be terminated?

On September 27, the Albuquerque Journal published the follow guest opinion column:

“Keller, Medina Have No Respect For ABQ By Supporting Gilbert Gallegos”

BY PETE DINELLI

FORMER ALBUQUERQUE CITY COUNCILOR AND FORMER CHIEF PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER FOR THE CITY

“APD Spokesman Gilbert Gallegos is back at it again using APD’s X, formerly Twitter, Account to engage in personal attacks against private citizens. He has maligned a former APD Chief, a private attorney, a former Bernalillo County Sherriff and accused a prominent businessman of being a racist, all because they have been vocal critics of APD.

The Citizens Police Oversight Agency sustained a complaint against Gallegos finding misconduct with his use of social media accounts. Mayor Tim Keller and APD Chief Harold Medina proclaim the “mean tweets” to be legitimate push back against APD critics.

The Albuquerque City Council has twice condemned the “mean tweets” and demanded they cease.

The function of PIO’s is to interreact with the press and the public and distribute accurate information to the public and the press and give interviews where necessary. APD Spokespersons historically have been sworn police officers. Gilbert Gallegos is a civilian at will employee, he is a former newspaper reporter and former spokesperson for elected officials and is essentially a political appointee.

Chief Medina and Mayor Keller refuse to put a stop to the “mean tweets” by Gallegos.

Apparently, they have no problem with “mean tweets,” by not acknowledging they violate city policy which states when replying to posts on city accounts, city employees are supposed to, “keep it professional and avoid confrontation.” When asked if the tweets followed city policy, Chief Medina said “some of them may not, but some of them bluntly point out differences. And I’m okay with that.” Mayor Keller for his part said his office “supports the department in their efforts to push back against misinformation on social media.”

Chief Medina and APD Spokesman Gilbert Gallegos have a warped misunderstanding of their role when it comes to dealing with the general public, processing citizen complaints and talking to the public in general. Their attitude as reflected by “mean tweets” is that unless you agree with APD and all of its actions, you are “anti-cop”, or you are a “cop hater.”

Chief Medina enabling a public relations attack on a private citizen because they are critical of APD is not appropriate. It is not cyberbullying as Chief Medina proclaims. Calling a businessman, who is exercising his right of free speech, a racist as Gallegos did is not keeping it professional nor is it avoiding confrontation but libelous. Making fun of a former Police Chief implying mental infirmity is offensive.

Gilbert and Chief Medina have a warped understanding of the concept of to protect and serve. They know the “mean tweets” generate extreme hostility and mistrust towards private citizens they target. We have a mayor who allows them to do it.

A citizen who has what they believe are legitimate complaints about APD does not mean APD has the right to vilify them or take issue with them and just presume that what they say is inaccurate or requiring a public push back. It does not mean APD has the right to engage in slander and violate people’s first amendment rights of free speech.

Gilbert Gallegos has no respect for the wishes of the Albuquerque City Council as he continues with his attacks on private citizens after they demanded that he stop.

Mayor Keller and Chief Medina have no respect for the city council as they continue to condone and supported the conduct of Gilbert Gallegos. The city council needs to take a vote on confidence and demand the termination of Gilbert Gallegos and go so far as defund the position if Mayor Keller fails to act.”

Pete Dinelli is a former Albuquerque city councilor, former chief public safety officer and former chief deputy district attorney. You can read his daily news and commentary blog at www.PeteDinelli.com.

The link to the Albuquerque Journal guest opinion column with photo is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/opinion/opinion-keller-and-medina-have-no-respect-for-abq-by-supporting-gilbert-gallegos/article_927272c6-7092-11ef-a8a8-2303385a2985.html

The links to a related blog articles are  here:

City Councilor Renée Grout Introduces Resolution To Prohibit “Mean Tweets” By City Officials; Legislation In Response To APD’s Misuse Of Social Media To Attack Private Citizens; Council Needs To Vote No Confidence And Demand Removal Of Public Relations Political Hack Gilbert Gallegos

APD Press Flack Gilbert Gallegos Back At It Again Using  Social Media To Attack APD Critics; City Council Needs To Vote No Confidence, Demand Termination And Defund Position

In April 2023 and then again in September 2024, two separate Albuquerque City Council’s took to task APD Director of Communications Gilbert Gallegos for using APD’s “X ” Account, formerly known as TWITTER, to engage in highly personal attacks against private citizens all because they are very  vocal critics of APD. Twice the Albuquerque City Council  condemned “mean tweets” posted by Gallegos on official APD social accounts in response to private citizen complaints.  The city council demanded he cease an desists with  his “mean tweets”.

Using official APD social media accounts, Gallegos  maligned  former APD Chief Michael Geier, the immediate predecessor of APD Chief Harold Medina,  private attorney Tom Grover, who is a retired APD cop and who has sued APD and represents police officers in personnel matters, Darren White, former Bernalillo County Sherriff and former Public Safety Cabinet Secretary who has commented to the press about inappropriate APD conduct. Gallegos has  accused  prominent businessman and commercial property owner Doug Peterson of being a whiner and complainer and a racist because of his complaints about APD mishandling of the homeless.  The Citizens Police Oversight Agency has sustained a complaint against Gallegos finding misconduct with his use of social media accounts.

Notwithstanding the City Council’s objections to the conduct of Gilbert Gallegos,   APD Police Chief Harold Medina and Mayor Tim Keller refused to put a stop to the “mean tweets” by Gallegos.  Mayor Tim Keller and APD Chief Harold Medina proclaimed the “mean tweets” are  legitimate push back against APD critics. They both expressed no problem with “mean tweets” even acknowledging the tweets violate city policy which states when replying to posts on city accounts, city employees are supposed to, “keep it professional and avoid confrontation.”

APD Chief Harold Medina said this:

“These are not random people. We are pushing back against the same individuals who use their positions to pursue a political agenda against APD. … .”

When asked if the tweets followed city policy, Medina said “some of them may not, but some of them bluntly point out differences. And I’m okay with that.” 

Mayor Keller for his part said he and his office “supports the department in their efforts to push back against misinformation on social media.”

RESOLUTION CALLING FOR NEW  SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY MANDATING GUIDELINES AND ACCOUNTABILITY

On September 13, 2024, in direct response to the conduct of APD Director of Communications and Spokesman Gilbert Gallegos,  District 9 City Councilor Renée Grout introduced resolution R-24-89 . The resolution is aimed at improving the use of official City social media accounts. The resolution directs the Keller Administration to develop a comprehensive social media policy that outlines clear guidelines for appropriate use, accountability, and consequences for misuse.

The resolution emphasizes the role of City government is to promote the public’s health, safety and growth. It directs the City Administration to create, implement, and enforce a comprehensive social media policy to be applied to all City public media accounts that includes:

• Behavioral expectations: Establishing clear guidelines for respectful and professional online conduct.
• Content specifications: Defining appropriate and inappropriate content for City social media accounts.
• Response guidelines: Providing guidance on how to respond to comments and messages, including those that may be negative or inflammatory.
• Monitoring and review: Implementing a system for regularly monitoring and reviewing social media accounts for compliance.
• Disciplinary actions: Outlining consequences for misuse of official social media accounts.

The resolution also requires the City Administration to make the social media policy easily accessible to the public and to establish a mechanism for reporting potential violations.

The link to the quoted source material on the Grout sponsored city council resolution is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/council/find-your-councilor/district-9/news/city-councilor-renee-grout-introduces-resolution-to-improve-social-media-accountability

City Councilor Renee Grout said that personal attacks against regular citizens by city government employees are unacceptable. Grout said this:

“[Gallegos’ conduct] disturbed me greatly. It also disturbed many others, it’s embarrassing to have this kind of behavior. We can’t respond that way. …  As City officials, we are in the customer service business. … . Anything posted on a City social media account should be true, helpful, and respectful. … We just need to have accountability and remember what we’re here for.  …  [W]e need to do a better job of responding to our customers and which are our constituents and help them out better”

I’m disappointed that it happened again and so we need lessons learned. We’re not going to do this again. So, we need to set expectations for the for the behavior. It needs to be outlined how, what is appropriate content to be posted? We need to set guidelines for, what is posted. We need to have guidelines for the appropriateness to, to respond to the negative or inaccurate posts, inflammatory comments and there needs to be discipline defined, discipline when things go wrong. There does need to be a disciplinary procedure.

We’re supposed to be following the law. We do have to take the higher road. What I say as a representative of the city of Albuquerque is very important. So, I need to be mindful of what I’m saying. We need to remember we’re representing the city of Albuquerque. We also would like to have social media policy put on the city’s transparency web page. So, we can all see it and we can all follow it.”

When asked about what’s the difference between her resolution and the new social media proposal and the city’s current social media policy and what she hoped to achieve with the new policy, Grout said this:

“The one that is in place doesn’t have the appropriateness. It doesn’t mention anything about the appropriateness of posts and what should be posted. It’s important that we remember that our personal opinions need to be left out. We need to remember that we’re representing the city of Albuquerque.

So, our personal opinions, personal attacks, those things are never OK. … Setting guidelines for employees is an administrative function. That’s why the Resolution directs the Administration to develop the social media policy but identifies things that the policy should include. 

There needs to be a disciplinary procedure and what is appropriate or what is not appropriate, and then what are the consequences for the inappropriate behavior.”

It was in April 2023 that then City Council President Pat Davis, who did not seek another term and is no longer on city council, vowed to work personally to defund Gilbert Gallegos position and to  prohibit APD from using the social media account unless the conduct stopped.

Grout stated that she is not seeking for the City Council to defund the position. Grout said this:

“That is not something that we can actually do. We can’t personally defund something. We can’t really defund the position because then there is a separation of powers. We can create a policy. The administration spends the money.”

THE KELLER ADMINISTRASTION RESPONDS

Ava Montoya, spokesperson for the mayor’s office, issued a very dismissive  statement regarding Councilor Grout’s new social media accountability resolution:

“The City already has a social media policy that’s posted online, and we welcome anyone to take a look at that.”

In a previous response to the controversy, Montoya said this”

“We’re focused on big issues, we don’t micromanage twitter banter. We support the department and their ability to push back on misinformation online.”

CIVILIAN POLICE OVERSIGHT AGENCY RESPONDS

On September 5, KOAT TV reached out to Civilian Police Oversight Agency executive director, Diane McDermott regarding Gilbert Gallegos’s X postings from APD’s account. She was asked if there has been any form of discipline following Gallegos’s use of the department’s twitter X page? If not, she was asked if there was a reason as to why? Also, she was asked what’s next, in terms of handling the situation?

McDermott made the following statement to KOAT TV over the phone:

“The Civilian Police Oversight Agency no longer investigates complaints regarding civilian employees. Due to an ordinance change, they’re investigated by the internal affairs within Albuquerque Police Department. We received a complaint, and it was forwarded to Internal Affairs Professional Standard.”

McDermott  also sent KOAT TV the following statement:

“The Civilian Police Oversight Agency must receive a citizen complaint to initiate an investigation. Due to an ordinance change in 2023, the CPOA Agency does not generally investigate APD civilian employees. Civilian employees such as operators, administrative personnel, or, in this instance, the PIO are investigated by Internal Affairs Professional Standards.

The Council wanted the CPOA’s primary focus to be on policing within the community. If a complaint is received regarding a civilian employee, it is transferred to IAPS unless it also involves the activities of sworn personnel, and then the CPOA will retain that investigation. Non-sworn employees will also be investigated by the CPOA performing similar police functions, such as Police Service Aides or APD Transit Safety personnel.

Regarding the question of discipline for Mr. Gallegos, the CPOA only recommends discipline, and so the question would have to be directed to the Office of Police Reform to determine if discipline has been imposed.

What is next would also be directed to the Department, but if a citizen complaint is received, it will be evaluated and, if it only concerns PIO responsibilities of non-sworn personnel, forwarded to IAPS for investigation.”

Links to quoted and relied upon news sources are here:

https://www.kob.com/new-mexico/albuquerque-metro/city-councilors-push-for-accountability-following-tweets-from-official-apd-account/

https://www.koat.com/article/albuquerque-police-social-media-policy/62195610

https://www.koat.com/article/albuquerque-police-department-chief-medina/62049109

https://www.koat.com/article/albuquerque-police-social-media/62073908

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/apd-slammed-for-social-media-conduct-this-time-by-city-councilors/article_7237b1ca-6ba0-11ef-9627-b3193d3a73c5.html

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

Councilor Grout’s resolution was introduced at the September 16 city council meeting.  It will be heard by at least one city council committee and it will be several weeks until the full 9 member city council votes on it. If approved, the city would have 30 days to develop the new policies.  The City Council should vote unanimously to enact the legislation and also vote No Confidence in Gilbert Gallegos and ask for his removal as APD Director of Communications.

The function of PIO’s is to interreact with the press and the public and distribute accurate information to the public and the press and give interviews where necessary. APD Spokespersons historically have been sworn police officers. Gilbert Gallegos is a civilian at will employee, is paid upwards of $120,000 a year, he is a former newspaper reporter and former spokesperson for elected officials and is essentially a public relations political hack..

Chief Medina and APD Spokesman Gilbert Gallegos have a warped misunderstanding of their role when it comes to dealing with the general public, processing citizen complaints and talking to the public in general.  Their attitude as reflected by “mean tweets” is that unless you agree with APD and all of its actions, you are “anti-cop” or you are a “cop hater”.

Chief Medina enabling a public relations political hack such as Gilbert Gallegos  to attack a private citizen because they are critical of APD is not appropriate. It is not cyberbullying as Medina has proclaimed. Calling a businessman who is exercising his right of free speech a racist as Gallegos did is not keeping it professional nor is it avoiding confrontation but libelous. Making fun of a former Police Chief implying mental infirmity affecting recall  is offensive.  Gilbert and Medina have a warped understanding of the concept of “to protect and serve”.  They know the “mean tweets” generate extreme hostility and mistrust towards private citizens they target. We also have a Mayor who allows them to do it.

A citizen who has what they believe are legitimate complaints about APD does not mean APD has the right to vilify them or take issue with them and just presume that what they say is inaccurate requiring a public “push back”.  It does not mean APD has the right to engage in libel and slander nor violate people’s first amendment rights of free speech.

Gilbert Gallegos has no respect for the wishes of the Albuquerque City Council as he continued with his attacks on private citizens after they demanded that he stop. Mayor Tim Keller and APD Chief Harold Medina have no respect for the City Council in that they have condoned and supported the conduct of Gilbert Gallegos.

It is clear that the current city policy on the use of social media by city government employees is very inadequate  especially when its totally ignored an unenforced by the Mayor and Chief of Police. The very dismissive statement by Ava Montoya regarding the proposed resolution was nothing but further evidence the Keller Administration see  no problem with the abuse of social media accounts to attack private citizens.  Councilor’s Grout Resolution should be enacted by the full council but it should also be the first step to get a handle on a very serious problem.

City Councilor Rene Grout is very misinformed, or simply does not understand, the city council does have the exclusive  authority to defund the position. The city council has exclusive authority over all city finances and appropriations and can fund and defund entire programs and positions as they see fit and when they deem it necessary and appropriate. Not more than  a few years ago, the  City Council reduced or defunded  APD sworn personnel positions from 1,100 to 1,000  because APD had failed to fill 100  positions for an  number of years that had not been filled.

The City Council needs to take a vote no confidence and demand the termination of Gilbert Gallegos and go so far as defund the position if Mayor Tm Keller fails to act.

For many decades, the Albuquerque Journal has commissioned polls for general elections in New Mexico.  The newspaper retains as its exclusive pollster the polling firm Research & Polling. Founded in 1986 by its President and CEO Brian Sanderoff, Research & Polling Inc. is New Mexico’s largest full-service market research and public opinion research company. The company today serves a wide variety of prominent national and New Mexico clients. https://www.rpinc.com/ When it comes to New Mexico politics. Research & Polling Inc is considered the gold standard of political polls because of its lengthy  history of accuracy.

This year’s poll was conducted from September 6 to September  13 and excluded  the evening of September 10 due to the presidential debate. The 2024 general election year poll included polling on the top issues including crime, the economy, education, border security and gun control.  The poll included the race for the Presidency, the United States Senate and on Governor Michelle Lujan’s job approval rating mid term to her second full 4 year term.

During the week of September 16 to September 22  the Albuquerque Journal ran front page articles reporting on  the results of the poll.  This blog article is an edited an quoted summary of the articles and poll results on the Presidential election, the election for United States Senator and on Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s job approvale rating followed by the links to the quoted articles in full  relied upon.

PRESIDENTIAL POLL 

Democrat Vice President Kamala Harris has a sizeable lead over Republican Donald Trump in this year’s presidential race in New Mexico.  According to the Journal Poll, 49% of registered, likely voters surveyed said they planned to vote for Vice President Harris, while 39% said they planned to support former President DonaldTrump while 3%  said they would vote for independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who suspended his campaign last month but is still on New Mexico’s ballot. Of the remaining voters surveyed, roughly 7% said they had not yet decided who they would vote for in the November 5 general election.

In the 2020 election, President Biden defeated Trump in New Mexico by nearly 11% points or about 100,000 votes. Brian Sanderoff, the president of Research & Polling Inc., which conducted the poll,  said the Harris-Trump poll results suggest the likelihood of a similar outcome to 2020.

“Male voters in New Mexico were nearly split between Trump and Harris while female voters were far more likely to support Harris than Trump.  Mirroring the national trend, there was a significant divide by education level, as voters with a college or graduate degree said they would vote for Harris by a nearly 2-to-1 margin. In contrast, voters without a college degree were more likely to support Trump.”

“The Journal Poll found voters in the Albuquerque metro area and the traditional Democratic stronghold of northern New Mexico were much more likely to support Harris than Trump. Trump enjoyed a nearly 2-to-1 advantage over Harris in the state’s more conservative east side, but that is not enough to offset the vice president’s edge in New Mexico’s more populous areas of Albuquerque, Las Cruces and Santa Fe.”

“The poll  found Anglo voters were nearly split between the two leading presidential candidates, while Hispanic voters tended to favor Harris. However, Trump’s 36% support level among Hispanics was higher than some Republican candidates have received in recent New Mexico statewide elections.

Another trouble spot for Trump could be his performance among self-described moderate voters. Among such voters, 68% said they planned to vote for Harris, while 20% said they intended to vote for Trump.”

The link to the cited and quoted Albuquerque Journal news article is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/election/journal-poll-kamala-harris-comfortably-ahead-of-donald-trump-in-new-mexico/article_0616e9d6-7201-11ef-b575-07a67a655850.html

UNITED STATES SENATE RACE

According to the Journal Poll, incumbent Senior Senator Democrat Martin Heinrich has a 12% lead over Republican Nella Domenici in the race for U.S. Senate. Heinrich is running for his third term representing New Mexico. This is  Domenici’s first run for public office.

“Heinrich garnered 50% of the registered, likely voters surveyed in the Journal poll while Domenici trails behind him with 38% saying they would vote for her. With rounded-off numbers, there were still 9% undecided and 4% who said they would vote for neither candidate. Heinrich has strong support from progressives, and Domenici has strong support from conservatives, but self-described moderates were also more likely to say they would cast a ballot for Heinrich.”

Heinrich and Domenici have unleashed a barrage of negative attack ads against each other. Domenici has tried to tie Heinrich to the opioid crisis,  dramatic increases in violent crime,  a failing economy and proclaim  that Heinrich has accomplished nothing for New Mexico in his 20 years as an elected official.  Heinrich has framed Domenici as an outsider and has claimed she has been recruited by Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnel and the MAGA Senate to enact a national abortion ban. One Heinrich attack ad claims a vote for Domenici is “a vote for a national abortion ban” and a Domenici ads have responded she would vote against such a ban.

“Although Domenici is the female candidate, she has much lower support than Heinrich among female voters. The poll found that Heinrich had a 22-point lead with women voters, with 55% of women supporting Heinrich compared to 33% supporting Domenici. Support for each candidate among male voters was close to a tie, with Heinrich ahead by 2 points.”

The link to the cited and quoted Albuquerque Journal story is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/journal-poll-heinrich-builds-double-digit-cushion-over-domenici/article_fc405b94-739b-11ef-81e0-ab7f8f56170a.html

GOVERNOR MLG’S APPROVAL RATING TAKES A HIT 

Governor Michell Lujan Grisham is term limited and has two years left in office.

According to the poll,  45% of registered, likely voters surveyed said they approved of the job Lujan Grisham was doing as governor which is  down 14% from 59% in September 2020, during the peak of COVID-19.The new poll also found that roughly 44% of voters said they disapproved of the Democratic governor’s job performance, with the remaining voters unsure or declining to state their opinion.

The Journal Poll found varying levels of support for the governor’s job performance around New Mexico.  Sanderoff said this:

“The state’s equally divided on the governor’s job performance, and two of the state’s regions are as well”.

“In the Albuquerque Metro area, which has increasingly skewed Democratic in recent years, 48% of voters surveyed said they approved of Lujan Grisham’s job performance, while 42% expressed disapproval.

Voters’ views were similarly divided in northwest New Mexico, which encompassed both part of the Navajo Nation and more conservative-leaning Farmington area.

Lujan Grisham retained strong voter approval in the traditional Democratic stronghold of northern New Mexico, while voters in eastern New Mexico expressed disapproval by a more than 2-to-1 margin.

The governor also enjoyed more support among female voters than male voters, with 51% of women surveyed expressing support for Lujan Grisham’s job performance compared to just 40% of men.

Lujan Grisham’s current approval rating is similar to but slightly higher than that of her predecessor, Republican ex-Gov. Susana Martinez, at the same point in her tenure. Martinez had an approval rating of 42% in October 2016, and her support level continued to decline prior to her leaving office at the end of 2018.

In addition to Martinez, Sanderoff pointed out that former governors Bill Richardson, a Democrat, and Gary Johnson, a Republican-turned-Libertarian, also saw their approval ratings decline during their final years in office.”

THE LUJAN GRISHAM RECORD

Lujan Grisham is a former three-term congresswoman representing the Albuquerque area.  She was elected governor in 2018 and won reelection in 2022.  Her tenure was  marked by the COVID-19 pandemic that saw New Mexico record one of the nation’s highest death rates per capita, and by record-high state revenue levels generated in large part by surging oil production in southeast New Mexico’s Permian Basin.

The increase is state revenue has allowed Lujan Grisham to sign bills increasing New Mexico starting teacher pay, expanding financial assistance to college students and providing state taxpayers with tax rebates.

The governor has increasingly clashed with members of her own party in the Legislature on crime issues.  A special session called by the governor in July ended in a matter of hours with lawmakers not even debating her crime-focused agenda. Lujan Grisham responded by saying legislators should be “embarrassed” by their actions, but top-ranking lawmakers have pushed back by questioning the legality of the governor’s bills and whether they would have actually reduced crime rates.

Lujan Grisham was vetted for a possible Cabinet post in President Joe Biden’s administration in 2020, but ultimately decided to remain in New Mexico. Lujan Grisham has very close personal ties to  Vice President Kamala Harris, who presided over the Governor’s wedding,  and she spoke at the 2024 Democratic National Convention and was a key spokesperson for the Vice Presidents campaign during the convention. Lujan Grisham is also on the national committee to elect Harris.  Speculation is widespread in New Mexico that Governor Lujan Grisham will be appointed to a cabinet position should Harris win the presidency and step down mid term and with Luetenant  Governor Howie Morales becoming Governor for two years.

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/journal-poll-lujan-grishams-job-approval-rating-dips-as-governors-second-term-nears-midway-point/article_772b849a-7465-11ef-82f5-af335a3f6467.html

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

The Journal poll is based on a statewide random sample of 532 voters who cast ballots in the 2020 and/or 2022 general election, and a sample of adults who registered to vote since December 2022 and who said they are likely to vote in the upcoming election. The sample was stratified by race and county and weighted by age, education level, and party affiliation based on traditional voting patterns in New Mexico general elections, to ensure a more representative sample. The voter sample has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.2% percentage points. The margin of error grows for subsamples. All interviews were conducted by live, professional interviewers, based in Albuquerque, with multiple callbacks to households that did not initially answer the phone.

Whenever polls such as this are released, the general voting public and candidates themselves tend to dismiss them saying the poll is not accurate because so few are interviewed. Like it or not, the public still view them with intense interest much like when people slow down as they pass a car wreck. When it comes to the major issues facing New Mexico voters, the Albuquerque Journal poll provides a solid reflection of what is going on in voters’ minds.

The 2024 general election is on November 5, a mere 6 weeks away. Given the track record and reputation for accuracy of Research and Polling,  its more likely than not the Vice President Kamal Harris will prevail in New Mexico over former President Donald Trump. It also likely that Democrat Senior Senator Martin Heinrich will prevail over Republican Nella Domenici.  Harris has a 10% lead over Trump while Heinrich has a 12% lead over Domenici and such leads at this point in time  can be considered insurmountable.

When it comes to Governor Michelle Lujan, her future in New Mexico in all likelihood is tied to the fate of Vice President Kamala Harris an if she becomes President. If the Governor is in fact given the opportunity to move on to a Cabinet position under Kamala Harris, it likely she will move on preferring not to deal with antagonistic legislature for two years.

The link to a related blog article on issues is here:

Albuquerque Journal Poll Reveals Voters Concerns On Major Issues; Causes Of Crime Believed To Be Drugs, Poverty And Homeless Not Broken Justice System; Crime Viewed As Big City Issue; Economy Viewed As Fair To Poor; 75% Support Age Restrictions On Purchase Of AR-15 Rifles, 52% Support Ban; Support For Border Wall Increases By Region And Party

For many decades, the Albuquerque Journal has commissioned polls for general elections in New Mexico.  The newspaper retains as its exclusive pollster the polling firm Research & Polling. Founded in 1986 by its President and CEO Brian Sanderoff, Research & Polling Inc. is New Mexico’s largest full-service market research and public opinion research company. The company today serves a wide variety of prominent national and New Mexico clients. https://www.rpinc.com/ When it comes to New Mexico politics. Research & Polling Inc is considered the gold standard of political polls because of  its lengthy  history of reliability and accuracy.

This year’s poll was conducted from September 6 to September  13 and excluded  the evening of September 10 due to the presidential debate. The 2024 general election year poll included polling on the top issues including crime, the economy, education, border security  and gun control.

During the week of September 16 to September 22  the Albuquerque Journal ran front page articles reporting on  the results of the poll.  This blog article is an edited an quoted summary of the articles and poll results on the major  issues as reported by the Albuquerque Journal followed by the links to the quoted articles in full  relied upon:

ISSUES MOST CONCERNING TO  VOTERS

The Albuquerque Journal poll asked respondents what is the biggest issue or concern facing New Mexico residents right now?   No single issue took precedence by a landslide. A majority of voters mentioned one of six issues as their top concern and those were inflation, crime, (K-12) education, weak economy/jobs/wages, illegal immigration/border security and homelessness.  Among other issues most cited were drugs, poverty, abortion, healthcare reform, gun control. Local/state government ethics, mental healt/behavioral health, quality of higher education system and climate change.

The results of the  six top issues of concern were:

• INFLATION: 18%
• CRIME: 16%
• QUALITY OF K-12 Education: 9%
• WEAK ECONOMY/JOBS/WAGES: 8%
• ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION/BORDER SECURITY: 8%
• HOMELESSNESS: 7%

Brian Sanderoff, president of Research & Polling Inc., said “this is just a way of getting a person’s top of mind, gut feeling [on] what’s the biggest thing. It doesn’t mean those other things aren’t of value.”  He noted that of the top five issues, two are related to the economy and two are related to crime.

Sanderoff said while the 18% and 16% difference between inflation and the economy isn’t that big, more voters are concerned about inflation because it impacts more people directly than crime does. Sanderoff said this:

“Everyone is impacted by the cost of living and cost of housing, cost of gasoline. … Crime is something that many people are directly impacted by, but many people are not. … Many people are just seeing it on TV news and reading about in the paper.”

“According to the poll, voters in the Albuquerque metro area are the most worried about crime, with 20% of people saying that’s the biggest issue. In contrast, only 6% of voters in eastern New Mexico said that’s the priority concern.

Only 14% of Albuquerque metro voters mark inflation as their top concern, much less than other areas of the state that had 18-24% of people most concerned about it.

Ideologically, voters leaning conservative, moderate and liberal largely agreed that inflation and crime are the top issues. The poll results found 17% of Democrats and 20% of Republicans thought that inflation was the biggest concern, while 16% of Democrats and 19% of Republicans said crime was the biggest issue.

Stark differences in partisanship came from those who chose illegal immigration or border security as their top issue. In the poll, 17% of Republicans compared to 2% of Democrats marked that as New Mexico residents’ biggest issue.

A few other concerns made the list, including poverty, abortion, health care reform and gun control, though only 2-3% of voters named any of those issues as their biggest concerns.  Meanwhile, 5% of those responding decided not to say or didn’t know what their biggest issue was.”

The link to the entire cited and quoted Albuquerque Journal article  with graphs  is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/journal-poll-new-mexicans-are-the-most-worried-about-inflation-and-crime/article_25a3d906-7528-11ef-8787-c7308faa37f7.html

MOST NEW MEXICANS THINK CRIME IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM

According to the Journal poll, most New Mexicans think crime is a problem and that drugs, poverty and homelessness are to blame. A smaller number believe illegal immigration, a broken criminal justice system and guns are the leading cause. The results, came from two crime-related questions:

1. How serious of a problem is crime?
2. What is the leading cause of crime?

84% of likely voters think crime is a very or somewhat serious problem, 12% see it as a minor problem and 3% see crime as “no problem at all.”  Brian Sanderoff, president of Research & Polling Inc., said this:

“Crime is seen as a big problem and opinions do vary, depending on where you live and who you are.”

“Women were more likely than men, 57% to 46%, to see crime as a “very serious” problem, according to the poll. Younger adults, between the ages of 18 and 34, were less likely to see crime as a very serious problem compared with 61% of those ages 50 to 64 years old. Sanderoff said “Younger people are more likely to feel they’re invulnerable” but added that 82% of young people still feel crime is more than just a minor problem.”

REGIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON CRIME

The poll found that 60% of those who live in the Albuquerque metro area, where most of the state’s crime occurs, feel it is a very serious problem while 37% in eastern New Mexico and 39% in Las Cruces and the southwestern part of the state agree.

In north central New Mexico, 22% see crime as a minor problem. Sanderoff pointed out that area encompasses more than just Santa Fe and includes Taos, Las Vegas and smaller communities. Sanderoff said this:

“So we’re seeing a big difference in perceptions regarding the seriousness of crime when it comes to how very serious it is. …  Attitudes toward the seriousness of crime do vary based on where you live or which political party you’re a member of.”

PARTY AFFILIATION REFLECTS ATTITUDES TOWARD CAUSES OF CRIME

Republicans and conservatives were more likely, 60% and 61%, respectively, to say it’s a very serious problem compared with 47% of Democrats and 38% of liberals, according to the poll.

Sanderoff said this:

“You’re always going to hear those people, including probably [Albuquerque] Mayor Tim Keller and others, say, ‘Well, yeah, crime is a problem, but the crime statistics demonstrate that we are plateauing or even in declining in certain crime statistics.” And so you’ll always find some people who will say, ‘Yeah, I think the perception is worse than the reality.’ And liberals might be part of that group. They’re more likely to defend Democratic leadership, whether it be in Albuquerque or the state of New Mexico.”

“For the question on the cause of crime, those polled were not given choices and were asked to offer a response to the pollster calling.

The poll found that drugs took the top spot with 26% of likely voters saying it was the leading cause, followed by poverty with 16% and homelessness with 12%.  Sanderoff said “it’s pretty telling” that a high proportion of likely voters cited drugs. He said some may be thinking of cartels trafficking fentanyl across the border while others think of the violence with someone getting killed during a deal gone bad.”

In north central New Mexico 37%, the highest majority, cited drugs and Sanderoff said that could be tied to places like Rio Arriba County’s “generational problem with heroin.” Sanderoff said this:

“One thing of interest though — those three items are all interrelated. … The top three causes that people mentioned, drugs, poverty and homelessness are all interrelated, because some of the key causes of homelessness are either poverty or drugs.”

“Democrats were more likely to mention those three as leading causes, according to the poll. Democrats and liberals, 21% and 29%, respectively, cited poverty compared with 7% of Republicans and 6% of conservatives.”

“The poll found that 8% of likely voters, largely Republicans, felt the cause was judges giving light sentences, 7% blamed a broken criminal justice system and 6% cited so-called “catch and release.” Another 7% of likely voters said the cause was a poor economy, 7% said illegal immigration and 6% said guns.”

“Among Republicans, 15% cited illegal immigration compared with 1% of Democrats, according to the poll. Among Democrats, 9% said guns were the leading cause compared with 1% of Republicans.”

Sanderoff said this of the results:

“We’ve got the Republicans more likely to say things like light sentences from judges, illegal immigration, revolving door — they’re more likely to mention those things than are the Democrats. …  Democrats lean more toward things like poverty, homelessness, drugs as well. So all of that’s interesting. …  So there are differences in the parties as to what they think the causes of crime are.”

The link to the cited and quoted Albuquerque Journal report is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/journal-poll-most-new-mexicans-think-crime-is-a-serious-problem/article_3b350cc8-7608-11ef-9735-ebca6118aa13.html#tncms-source=home-featured-7-block

THE ECONOMY: PEOPLE FEEL NO BETTER OFF NOW THAN BEFORE PANDEMIC

The Albuquerque Journal poll asked likely voters two questions on New Mexico’s economy:

1. How would you rate the conditions of New Mexico’s economy?
2. How would you rate your finances compared to just a few years ago before the pandemic?

According to the Journal Poll, most New Mexicans do not have a favorable view of the state’s economy. They rate the economy as fair or poor.  A majority say they are worse off financially or about the same as before the COVID-19 pandemic.

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

“According to the poll, 40% of likely voters rated economic conditions as fair, while another 38% rated the economy as poor. Another 19% rated economic conditions as good, 1% responded excellent, and 2% either didn’t know or wouldn’t say. Among those in eastern New Mexico, 50% rated the state’s economy as poor, while 27% in north central New Mexico (Santa Fe and Taos)  rated it the same.”

PARTY AFFILIATION, EDUCATION IMPACT PERCEPTION OF ECONOMY

Brian Sanderoff said that party affiliation has an impact on perception of the economy.

“Republicans (61%) are much more likely to have rated New Mexico’s economy as poor compared to Democrats (25%). Democrats (43%) and independent/unaffiliated voters (50%) were more likely to rate the economy as fair. Those same groups were also more likely to rate the economy as good, with 28% of Democrats and 18% of independent voters rating it that way. Sanderoff said some likely voters, particularly Democrats, who rate the economy as good or fair may see improving economic conditions with inflation cooling significantly over the last few months.

Educational attainment levels are also a big predictor of the assessment of economic conditions. Those with a college degree are much less likely to rate economic conditions poorly, Sanderoff said. There aren’t “tremendously big differences,” Sanderoff said, when it comes to gender, with 42% of males and 37% of women rating the economy as fair, and another 36% of males and 41% of females rating the economy as poor.”

PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION

Those surveyed were asked if they are financially better off, worse off or about the same compared to a few years ago. 38% of those surveyed said they were  worse off followed by 37% who said about the same. 24% percent of likely voters said they are better off.

“Despite increases in wages and a relatively low unemployment rate, Sanderoff said he suspects that few voters rate the economy as excellent or good due to the cost of living and cost of housing, which have taken on sharp increases post-COVID.

In Albuquerque, for instance, the median sales price for a single-family detached home,  the most common type in the area,  was $361,000, according to the Greater Albuquerque Association of Realtors. That’s up from $226,000 in August 2019.

“Concerns about inflation, I think, are impacting people’s assessment of the economic conditions,” Sanderoff said.

Likely voters’ views on the state’s economic conditions, Sanderoff said, are partly reflected in how people perceive their finances.

62%  of both Republicans and self-reported conservatives said they are worse off compared to 23% of Democrats and 19% of liberals. And 32% of Democrats and 38% of liberals are more likely to say they are better off.

Roughly 44% of Democrats said they are financially about the same, compared to 25% of Republicans.

In eastern New Mexico, where more Republicans and conservatives tend to live, 58% said they are worse off compared to 34% in the Albuquerque metro.”

Those 18-34 years of age (36%) and 35-49 years of age (32%) were also more likely to say they are better off than before COVID compared to those between the ages of 50-64 (18%) and 65-older (16%).

Sanderoff said this about age:

“Younger people are still ascending in their positions at work,  they’re still getting promotions above and beyond salary increases. … And then as you get older — retirement years or beginning to plateau at work — you’re seeing less wage increases. … People who are retired are living on fixed incomes, and therefore are more susceptible to the ill effects of inflation.”

The link to the cited and quoted Albuquerque Journal article with graphs  is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/journal-poll-4-in-10-voters-say-they-are-worse-off-than-before-pandemic/article_d4b34ea0-76d0-11ef-8e1e-b3b13c43c9e8.html#tncms-source=home-featured-7-block

GUN CONTROL

The journal poll asked two-gun control questions:

Do you support or oppose legislation in New Mexico raising the age t0 purchase an AR-15 style semiautomatic rifle from 18 to 21 years old?

• 75% support
• 20% oppose
• 4% were undecided
• 1% did not know

An overwhelming majority of 75% of registered, likely voters surveyed said they would favor legislation raising the minimum age to purchase an AR-15-style rifle, while 20% expressed opposition. A majority of both male and female voters supported the idea, though women were more likely than men to express support, and most voters surveyed in all regions of New Mexico backed the proposal. The poll results showed a majority of both Democratic and Republican voters in support, with 59% of Republicans expressing support compared to 36% in opposition.

Do you support or oppose legislation in New Mexico banning the sale of AR-15 style semiautomatic rifles?

• 52% support
• 43% oppose
• 4% were undecided
• 1% did not know

“A ban is a bridge too far for many Republicans and residents of certain parts of the state,” said Brian Sanderoff, the president of Research & Polling Inc.

“Support levels among male voters and Republicans dropped sharply when it came to the question of whether to enact a ban on AR-15-style rifles. The percentage of male voters who supported a ban was 38% — compared to 69% of male voters who supported increasing the minimum age to buy such firearms — and a majority of voters in three of the state’s five regions opposed the idea of an assault weapon ban. Most voters in the Albuquerque metro area and north-central New Mexico, which includes Santa Fe, expressed support for the proposal.”

The link to the cited and quoted Albuquerque Journal article with graphs  is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/journal-poll-nm-voters-strongly-back-raising-age-to-buy-ar-15-style-rifles-more/article_8c2697ee-776d-11ef-baaf-ef4bb9b3c68f.html

SUPPORT FOR BORDER WALL INCREASES

The Journal poll found that New Mexicans’ support for a border wall along the U.S., Mexico border has increased since 2018.  The poll also found that  the state’s voters are also concerned with border security, with 84% of likely voters surveyed saying the border is a somewhat serious or very serious problem.

“Of the likely voters surveyed, 52% support building a border wall and 37% oppose it, with 8% who were undecided or said it depends, and 3% who don’t know or won’t say.  This is a dramatic change and is higher since  the last time the Journal polled this question in 2018, when 37% of voters supported building a border wall and 56% opposed it.”

“New Mexican voters are also more concerned about border security than they were in 2018. In a 2018 poll, 69% of people polled said border security was a very or somewhat serious problem. The new  poll found a 15 percentage point increase, with 84% saying border security was a very or somewhat serious problem. The new poll shows 53% of voters said border security was a very serious problem, 31% said it was a somewhat serious problem, 11% said it was a minor problem and 3% said it was no problem at all. In 2018, 39% said it was a very serious problem and 10% said it was no problem at all.”

PARTISAN DIVIDE ON BORDER WALL

“The poll reveals that  support for continuing to build a border wall was partisan, with a quarter of Democrats, and the vast majority, 91%, of Republicans in support. Independents were evenly split on the issue, with 41% in support, 42% opposed and 14% undecided.”

“Having a positive opinion of former President Donald Trump correlates strongly with support for continuing to build a border wall. Among voters with a favorable opinion of Trump, 90% support continuing to build the border wall, while the majority of voters with an unfavorable opinion of Trump oppose continuing to build the border wall, with only 23% in that group supportive of continuing to build the wall.”

REGIONAL DIFFERENCES ON BORDER WALL

“The Journal poll revealed big regional variations in border wall support. Support is strong for a border wall in northwest New Mexico at 61% and very strong within the eastern region of the state, with 71% of voters polled in that region supportive of continuing to build the border wall.”

“In the Albuquerque metro area support is weaker, with 49% of voters in favor and 40% opposed. The north-central region, which includes Santa Fe and Taos and is the most liberal leaning area of the state, is the only region where there is more opposition to the idea than support, with 33% supportive of building the border wall and 50% opposed.”

In the Las Cruces and southwest area where three counties are actually on the border with Mexico, there is slightly more support than statewide and slightly more opposition, with fewer voters undecided. Among voters in the southwest region 55% support continuing to build the border wall, 40% are opposed and 5% are undecided.”

The link to the cited and quoted Albuquerque Journal report is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/journal-poll-new-mexican-voters-support-for-border-wall-rises/article_17f17a0c-778a-11ef-81a8-776fb805e69f.html

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

The Journal poll is based on a statewide random sample of 532 voters who cast ballots in the 2020 and/or 2022 general election, and a sample of adults who registered to vote since December 2022 and who said they are likely to vote in the upcoming election. The sample was stratified by race and county and weighted by age, education level, and party affiliation based on traditional voting patterns in New Mexico general elections, to ensure a more representative sample.

The voter sample has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.2% percentage points. The margin of error grows for subsamples. All interviews were conducted by live, professional interviewers, based in Albuquerque, with multiple callbacks to households that did not initially answer the phone.

Whenever polls such as this are released, the general voting public and candidates themselves tend to dismiss them saying the poll is not accurate because so few are interviewed. Like it or not, the public still view them with intense interest much like when people slow down as they pass a car wreck. When it comes to the major issues facing New Mexico voters, the Albuquerque Journal poll provides a solid reflection of what is going on in voters’ minds.