On May 13, 2024 Federal Court Appointed Monitor James Ginger filed his 19th Independent Federal Monitor’s report. The 19th Monitor’s Report covers the time period of August 1, 2023, through January 31, 2024.  The report is 115-pages long.  It is the shortest report filed to date with the previous reports averaging about 300 pages.  The link to review the entire 19^th report is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/police/documents/final-imr-19.pdf/view

The Court Approved Settlement Agreement mandates 271 police reforms, the appointment of a Federal Monitor and the filing of Independent Monitor’s reports (IMRs) on APD’s compliance with the reforms. There are 276 paragraphs in 10 sections within the CASA with measurable requirements that the monitor reports on. The ultimate goal of the settlement was to implement constitutional policing practices.  Its aim is to make sure APD police officers follow policy and don’t use excessive force or deadly force. The U.S. Department of Justice investigation a decade ago found a disturbing pattern and practice of the use of unconstitutional excessive force by Albuquerque Police officers, particularly with the mentally ill or those in crisis as the victims.  The link to the 118-page CASA is here:

https://documents.cabq.gov/justice-department/settlement-agreement.pdf

The 19^th Federal Monitor’s report finds that APD has reached 100% Primary Compliance,  100% Secondary Compliance and 96% Operational Compliance.  Under the terms and conditions of the CASA, once APD achieves a 95% compliance rate in all 3 identified compliance levels and maintains it for 2 consecutive years, the case can be dismissed. Originally, APD was to have come into compliance within 4 years and the case was to be dismissed in 2018. However, because of delay and obstruction tactics by both APD management and the police union to implement in full the reforms, a 5 year delay resulted.

The 3 compliance levels are explained as follows:

PRIMARY COMPLIANCE

Primary compliance is the “policy” part of compliance. To attain primary compliance, APD must have in place operational policies and procedures designed to guide officers, supervisors and managers in the performance of the tasks outlined in the CASA. As a matter of course, the policies must be reflective of the requirements of the CASA; must comply with national standards for effective policing policy; and must demonstrate trainable and evaluable policy components.

SECONDARY COMPLIANCE

Secondary compliance is attained by implementing supervisory, managerial and executive practices designed to and be effective in implementing the policy as written, e.g., sergeants routinely enforce the policies among field personnel and are held accountable by managerial and executive levels of the department for doing so. By definition, there should be operational artifacts such as reports, disciplinary records, remands to retraining, follow-up, and even revisions to policies if necessary, indicating that the policies developed in the first stage of compliance are known to, followed by, and important to supervisory and managerial levels of the department.

OPERATIONAL COMPLIANCE

Operational compliance is attained at the point that the adherence to policies is apparent in the day-to-day operation of the agency e.g., line personnel are routinely held accountable for compliance, not by the monitoring staff, but by their sergeants, and sergeants are routinely held accountable for compliance by their lieutenants and command staff. In other words, the APD “owns” and enforces its policies.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The 19^th Federal Monitors report contains the following succinct summary of the 115 page report:

“APD and CPOA  [Civilian Police Oversight Agency] have made significant progress during the IMR-19 reporting period. The monitor acknowledges that progress has taken a significant effort from APD, CPOA, and the City. The number of APD self-monitored paragraphs is at the highest point in the history of the CASA compliance efforts. This is a significant achievement, indicating that APD is now capable of assuming responsibility for oversight of CASA requirements and is not reliant on the monitoring team to do so.

We note that all the CASA paragraphs relating to discipline are compliant. This represents another milestone for APD’s compliance efforts. As of the 19th reporting period, APD is effectively self-monitoring 191 paragraphs.

Perhaps more importantly, we found all force investigation processes compliant during the 19th reporting period. Level 2 and Level 3 use of force incidents were down 16 percent from the last reporting period. We consider this strong evidence that APD’s policies, supervisory oversight, and disciplinary systems are working as designed.

We note that the External Force Investigation Team (EFIT) is no longer providing oversight to the Internal Affairs Force Division (IAFD). Similar progress is evident at CPOA during this reporting period. All the CPOA investigations reviewed by the monitoring team this reporting period were compliant with the CASA requirements. The CPOA Board has been fully reconstituted and are currently working to complete training and other requirements of the CASA.

We would be remiss, however, if we did not note some remaining areas that are still in need of improvement. These include:

• CPOA issues related to timelines and staffing;
• Completing the implementation of effective training for the CPOA Board members; and
• Continuing improvement of supervisory oversight of in-field activities such as use of force.

Frequent readers of the monitor’s reports will note that this “to-do list” is markedly shorter than in the past. This is reflective of the significant progress APD has made over the last six months.”

The link to review the entire 19^th report is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/police/documents/final-imr-19.pdf/view

STATUS HEARING ON 19^TH FEDERAL MONITORS REPORT

On June 4, Federal U.S. District Judge James Browning, the presiding Judge over the Court Approved Settlement Agreement (CASA) held a status conference to go over the 19^th Federal Monitor’s report and listened to testimony from the parties. During the five-hour hearing before Judge Browning, he asked a number of questions of city officials, the party’s to the lawsuit and the Federal Monitor ranging from APD’s staffing to whether Albuquerque is number 1 in the country for violent crime per capita.

Federal Monitor James Ginger and Department Of Justice (DOJ) officials reported that APD is now at fully compliant with the court-approved settlement agreement known as the CASA.   The significance of APD being in compliance is that APD has now entered into  a new “sustainment” phase to last until the end of 2025. If there’s no backsliding, which has occurred in the past,  the DOJ consent decree can be dismissed as mandated by the settlement.

The DOJ officials applauded APD leadership for increasing transparency in the department and praised the quality and thoroughness of its Internal Affairs investigations of police misconduct.   Federal Monitor James Ginger and Department Of Justice (DOJ) officials reported a significant improvement and turnaround in the operations of the Albuquerque Police Department (APD).  DOJ officials told Judge Browning the improvement is due in part to the creation of a new city agency to handle calls from those in distress and the overhaul of police excessive force policies and training, and improvements in supervisory oversight and evaluation.

CIVILIAN POLICE OVERSIGHT AGENCY PROBLEMATIC AS TO ACHIEVING COMPLIANCE

Paul Killebrew, the Deputy Chief of the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division said the city is at 96% Operational Compliance with several hundred reforms set out in the Court Approved Settlement  Agreement:

“This is a victory we’ve long wanted to see.”

While APD achieved compliance in all 3 areas, the remaining 4% of the  Operational Compliance noncompliance pertains to the city’s Civilian Police Oversight Agency. According to the DOJ, Compliance failure was reported primarily due to lack of staffing and timeliness of its investigations of complaints.  Paul Killebrew, the Deputy Chief of the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, told Judge Browing  that the civilian agency is improving its operations, and increased staffing is expected to help.

As for the APD, Killebrew said this:

“For two years, we want to see compliance be maintained and that can persuade us the reforms are durable. … We’ve learned over time these institutional reform cases can be complicated. We need to see systems implemented that will prevent a recurrence in the future.”

Killebrew told the court that the police agencies in  Portland, Seattle and the Virgin Islands have  achieved compliance with DOJ consent decrees but could not sustain that compliance for the 2 years that followed.  Killebrew said it was premature to say what would happen if APD  failed to sustain compliance over the next two years. Killebrew said this:

“We would have to see what noncompliance looks like.”

OTHERS REPORT

Independent Monitor James Ginger, whose monitoring team of experts is expected to stay on through the next two years, said this:

“Overall, I’m optimistic.”

Richard Necelis, associate monitor on Ginger’s team for his part said this:

“What I’ve seen is more than box-checking.  I’ve been looking at the disciplinary system since 2015. There really has been deep-rooted change.”

U.S. Attorney for New Mexico Alexander Uballez for his part told the court this:

“We do have a reason to celebrate a milestone.  … [but] much remains to be done. … The coming years offer hope. … This change is about taking our city back. This milestone belongs to our city, and to all of us.”

APD POLICE OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTINGS STILL “TROUBLING”

It was reported that despite the improvement and gains made by APD to implement the reforms, APD Police Officer involved shootings are still occurring at “deeply troubling” rate.  Judge Browning said he has been asked how APD can be in compliance with the CASA given that the level of police shootings is “at the same level as it was when you started this process. We are still having, I would say, troubling police shootings.”

In response to Judge Browning, Killebrew said this:

“The number of police shootings is deeply troubling. It’s not what we anticipated. In 2024, we’re still watching what’s going on.”

In the past, the DOJ investigation concluded, there was a high number of “unlawful” shootings followed by little to no accountability of officers who violated the Fourth Amendment.  Killebrew said in the DOJ’s evaluation of 2022 and 2023 individual incidents and the internal systems used by the APD to evaluate them, “we did not see the pattern continuing.” Killebrew added that with training and de-escalation skills, police officers are using a different approach to handling difficult encounters. Killebrew said this:

“All of these things help to ensure officers use force when necessary and only the amount of force necessary.”

According to DOJ officials, it is monitoring those incidents.  Notwithstanding, DOJ officials testified and told Judge Browning that serious use of force incidents are down.  DOJ officials testified the shootings generally have been found to be constitutionally sound.

Taylor Rahn, an Albuquerque attorney representing the city of Albuquerque, told Judge Browning that in 2023, in every APD officer-involved shooting, the suspect was armed and only one didn’t involve a firearm and that incident involved a knife.

A trend reported to the court was that much of the past “use of deadly force” was directed at people who were “in crisis.”  However, in 2023, none of the officer-involved shootings stemmed from calls initiated as behavioral health calls. Rahns said each started as an actual crime in process.

Killebrew said serious force incidents “continue to decline” and there is progress the city has made outside of the court-approved settlement agreement, such as the creation of the Albuquerque Community Services agency that has diverted calls involving potentially mentally ill or distressed people away from an initial police response.

APD RANKS #1 IN CIVILIAN KILLINGS OUT OF THE 50 LARGEST CITY POLICE DEPARTMENTS IN THE COUNTRY

During the June 4 status conference, Judge Browning asked Chief Medina whether Albuquerque is number one in the country for violent crime per capita as reported by the media. Chief Medina told the Judge Browning that contrary to some news reports, it is the state of New Mexico that is highest in the country per capita for violent crime. What was not discussed during the June 4 hearing was the extent of killings of civilians by APD.

On April 10, the on line news publication Searchlight New Mexico published a remarkable story researched and written by its  staff reporter Josh Bowling.  The article is entitled “Can the Albuquerque Police Department ever be reformed?”  The article goes into great detail explaining the Court Approved Settlement Agreement, what has been done to reform APD and the the role of the Federal Monitor. The link to read the full, unedited Searchlight New Mexico article with photos and graphs is here:

https://searchlightnm.org/can-the-albuquerque-police-department-ever-be-reformed/?utm_source=Searchlight+New+Mexico&utm_campaign=ca4e266790-4%2F10%2F2024+-+Albuquerque+Police+Department+Reform&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_8e05fb0467-ca4e266790-362667516&mc_cid=ca4e266790&mc_eid=ccd9412715

The Search Light New Mexico article reported that  last year, the Albuquerque Police Department killed 10.6 people per million residents,  more than any other sizable police department in the nation, according to data tracked by the national nonprofit Mapping Police Violence.

Following are the relevant excerpts from the Search Light New Mexico article

In 2022, the department set a record for police shootings with 18, 10 of which were fatal. That year, a Searchlight analysis found, only the police departments in Los Angeles, New York and Houston killed more people than APD.

Law enforcement officials, including police leaders and district attorneys, say such figures are nuanced. They point to the acute dearth of mental health resources in New Mexico and, anecdotally, stories of people who draw guns on police officers as explanations for why the problem of police violence is so outsized locally.”

…

“In the past four years, Albuquerque police repeatedly shot people who were suffering visible mental health crises. They shot 26-year-old Max Mitnik in the head during a “schizoaffective episode” in which he asked officers to fire their weapons at him; they shot and killed 52-year-old Valente Acosta-Bustillos who swung a shovel at officers and told them to shoot him; they shot and killed 33-year-old Collin Neztsosie while he was on his cell phone, pleading for help with a 911 dispatcher.

These grim numbers have led reform advocates, critics and law enforcement leaders themselves to question what it means to be “in compliance.”

“You can improve things on paper or comply with the terms of a consent decree and still have these things happening. … Albuquerque is a prime place to be asking the questions…about what impact consent decrees have. The city should be ground zero for the national conversation on police reform” said UCLA law professor Joanna Schwartz, author of the 2023 book “Shielded: How the Police Became Untouchable.”

This is not to say that the consent decree has been without merit. The 2014 Court-Approved Settlement Agreement between the DOJ and Albuquerque laid out nearly 300 mandated reforms: Since its launch, APD has fulfilled hundreds of reform requirements, including overhauling scores of policies and training procedures.”

The Search Light New Mexico article contains a horizontal graph listing the 50 largest cities in the United States. According to the graph, among the 50 largest cities, Albuquerque Police killed people at the highest rate than all the other city police departments in 2023  at the rate of  10.6 per 1 Million population. It is worth comparing Albuquerque’s 10.6 kill rate to the largest cities in the surrounding border states of Texas, Colorado, Arizona and also including Oklahoma and Nevada:

• Albuquerque, NM: 10.6
• San Antonio, Texas:  9.8
• Phoenix, Arizona: 8.7
• Austin, Texas: 7.3
• Denver, Colorado: 5.6
• Tucson, Arizona: 5.5
• Fort Worth, Texas: 5.4
• Houston, Texas: 5.2
• Colorado Springs, Colorado: 4.2
• Dallas, Texas: 3.1
• El Paso, Texas: 2.9
• Las Vegas, Nevada: 2.6
• Oklahoma City, Oklahoma: 2.0

APD PERSONNEL LEVELS

APD Chief Harold Medina gave Judge Browning a report on APD personnel levels. Medina told Judge Browning the current  number of APD sworn police officers currently is at 950, but that is questionable.  Chief Medina did not report that for the last 15 years, APD has had a consistent meltdown and decline in overall number of APD sworn officers.

On December 1, 2009 when Mayor Richard Berry was sworn into office succeeding Mayor Marty Chavez, the Albuquerque Police Department (APD) was the best trained, best equipped, best funded police department in its history. In 2009, APD was fully staffed with 1,100 sworn police officers.  APD response times had been brought down below the national average and violent and property crime rates in Albuquerque were hitting historical lows.

During the 8 years Mayor Richard Berry was in office, the city’s violent crime and property crime rates hit historical highs and APD went into a personnel meltdown going from 1,100 sworn police officers to 853 sworn police, a loss of 247 sworn police. Since taking office on December 1, 2017 Mayor Tim Keller has made Public Safety his number one priority over the last 7 years because of the city’s spiking violent crime rates.

Notwithstanding all of APD’s efforts to recruit and expand APD, the department is still seriously short staffed. This is despite the millions being spent on salary increases, sign on bonuses and being the best paid law enforcement agency in the state and the region.

According to the 2024-2025 proposed budget, by mid-fiscal year 2024, APD had 856 sworn officers which is only 3 more sworn police than the day Keller took office in 2017.  Given the volume of arrests and cases, APD is critically understaffed to complete its mission.

The link to a quoted and relied upon news source  is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/doj-outside-experts-praise-apds-compliance-with-use-of-force-reforms/article_79c2735a-22b0-11ef-a007-23c3b4e2a3d7.html

APD BRIBERY AND CONSPRACY SCANDAL TO DISMISS DWI CASES

It was on Friday January 19, 2024 that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) executed search warrants and raided the homes of 3 Albuquerque Police officers and the home and law office of prominent DWI criminal defense attorney Thomas Clear, III.  All 6 are allegedly involved in a bribery and conspiracy scheme spanning a decade to dismiss DWI cases. Bernalillo County District Attorney Sam Bregman ordered the dismissed 196 DWI cases because of the scandal due to the main witnesses’ credibility being called into question which in all the cases are APD officers. All 6 of the APD officers have since resigned.  The Albuquerque Police Department has opened its own Internal Affairs investigation of the 6 APD officers and the FBI Investigation is continuing and no one has yet to be charged.

The ongoing FBI criminal investigation of APD’s bribery and conspiracy scandal was a topic of discussion during the June 4 status conference on the Court Approved Settlement Agreement. During the hearing, U.S. District Judge James Browning brought up the criminal investigation of the DWI unit and asked, “If what I read in the paper might be occurring, would that violate any of the terms of [the agreement]? If the police department was unable to discover such a large problem, would that cause any concern [related to the consent decree compliance]?”

Paul Killebrew, deputy chief of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, responded that he wasn’t privy to the investigation by the DOJ’s criminal division. He said it would be premature to draw any conclusions. Killebrew told Judge Browning this:

“… APD can’t solve its force problem if it doesn’t solve its accountability function. … I don’t know what’s going on or how far-reaching things are [with the DWI dismissal investigation], but with any large organization, you have to expect there will be some people who violate the law. We don’t know if it’s a systems breakdown or individual violations.”

Browning pressed Killebrew and asked: “Is that an area that could be a problem with continued compliance over the next two years?”  Killebrew responded “Oh, yes. [If a widespread problem is uncovered by the FBI criminal investigation that implicates the accountability of the APD] that would raise some serious questions about the efficacy of reform.”

U.S. Attorney Uballez told Judge Browning that there was much he and Medina could nor  divulge about the FBI inquiry, but Uballez added that the investigation has proceeded in full partnership with APD and he said  “People will be held to account.”

The link to the quoted and relied upon news source is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/how-the-dwi-unit-probe-nearly-got-derailed/article_05863e82-24e9-11ef-af2e-f39f8b82dfee.html#tncms-source=home-featured-7-block

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

The announcement that APD,  after over 9 years,  is now in full compliance with the Court Approved Settlement and implementation of the reforms is indeed a historic milestone.  APD is commended for at last getting the job done.  The 19^th report from the monitor essentially says APD is “effectively self-monitoring” and that APD’s uses of force have decreased. The monitor’s report notes that APD still needs to improve supervisory oversight of in-field activities. The monitor also has said  the Civilian Police Oversight Agency, which focuses on police accountability, needs to address timeliness and staffing issues.

The resulting settlement agreement with the DOJ led to an overhaul of APD use of force policies, recruitment, training, internal affairs procedures and field supervision of officers.  The implementation of all the reforms took over twice as long as was originally agreed and required the expenditure of millions of dollars and oversight by an outside independent monitor. The Federal Monitor and his team have been paid upwards of $11 Million for their services and reports. The city has also spent over $40 million to implement the reforms.

The Court Approved Settlement Agreement requires 95% Operational Compliance by APD. Operational compliance tracks whether officers follow policies and whether they’re corrected when they don’t. According to this latest report  APD is  at 96% Operational Compliance.

Since October 2019, APD has been and has remained at 100% Primary Compliance, meaning all required policies and procedures are in place. APD is also at 100% Secondary Compliance regarding the training of officers.

The achievement of 96% of Operational Compliance now allows APD to enter a new phase of implementation directed towards the  dismissal of the case. What the 19^th report means is that APD can move toward self-monitoring with all of its remaining sections that have not already been dismissed by the court. If compliance can be sustained at 95% or more in all 3 compliance levels for two years, the case can be dismissed.

PEOPLE IN MENTAL CRISIS

The Court Approved Settlement Agreement was the result of an 18-month long investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) that found that the Albuquerque Police Department engaged in a pattern of “excessive use of force” and “deadly force”, especially when dealing with the mentally ill and the homeless.  The 19^th Federal Monitor’s report states in part as follows:

“[In evaluating APD’s  and the city’s current response to] individuals in crisis and people who are unsheltered, we note that APD has met, and in many cases, far exceeded, the requirements of the CASA as it relates to mental health response planning, crisis intervention, training development and delivery, and services delivery. … We remain highly concerned about the sheer number of officer-involved shooting of people in crisis or people with mental illness. We appreciate the CIU’s efforts to continuously review officer behavior in the field and take appropriate corrective actions when necessary. Still, APD leadership and accountability structures must also effectively address these issues.”

FLY IN THE OINTMENT

The only fly in the ointment at this point continues to be the Civilian Police Oversight Agency. Issues found with the Civilian Police Oversight Agency include inadequate staffing and late completion of investigations, due to excessive caseloads the report said.

The 19^th Federal Monitor’s report put it this way:

“From the monitor’s perspective, CPOA remains in crisis. … The change in compliance levels does not effectively demonstrate the progress made by APD and the CPOA (Civilian Police Oversight Agency) during this reporting period. … In this report, APD has demonstrated its commitment to policies, supervisory oversight, and importantly, a disciplinary process that holds officers accountable when necessary.”

It was the 18^th  Federal Monitor’s Report that identified the failures of civilian oversight as  representing  the largest remaining roadblock to the city in ending the consent decree with the U.S. Department of Justice.  Twelve of the remaining 15 paragraphs of the Court Approved Settlement Agreement involve failures with the Civilian Police Oversight Agency (CPOA) which is appointed and overseen by the Albuquerque City Council.  The Civilian Police Oversight Advisory Board (CPOA) was formed in January, 2023 after the City Council abolished the previous Civilian Police Oversight Board.

The 18th Federal Monitor’s Report found that the civilian oversight mandated by the CASA is “in crisis” with understaffing and excessive caseloads leading to inadequate investigations by the external board tasked with everything from evaluating civilian complaints to weighing in on police shootings.  The report also showed that 12 of the remaining 15 sections of the settlement that are noncompliant revolve around the operations of the Civilian Police Oversight Advisory Board. The monitor found that since the change made in January, 2023, the CPOA had not been able to properly function.

The 18^th Monitor’s  Report states:

“From the monitor’s perspective, CPOA is in crisis. This crisis was birthed by understaffing, the need for the City to fill supervisory and oversight positions, and the need to improve the organizational structure of the agency.”

The CPOA’s problems led the city to fall behind on Secondary Compliance which had reached 100% compliance in the 17th report but dropped by 1% and is  now at 99%  in the 18^th IME Report due to a drop in CPOA training.

Then City Council President Pat Davis  said in a letter to Mayor Tim Keller that changes to “key leadership” within the City Council and the administration “slowed things down” over the summer, but they have since interviewed more than a dozen applicants for the vacant board positions.  Davis said the council expected to reach its initial goal of having those positions filled, as well as filling a crucial leadership role, by the end of the year.

Davis said the board was  expected to be fully staffed and hire a contract compliance officer, who would make sure the CPOA abides by the settlement agreement and would be in charge of staffing, by the end of December. Davis said this:

“We’re on track. … This is the last big-ticket item, the administration wants it done fast, the monitor wants it done fast, we want it done well — and fast.”

On January 1, 2024  a new city council was  sworn in.  During a November 8 news conference announcing the 18^th Federal Monitors Report, Mayor Keller emphasized the CPOA is the responsibility of the City Council, but said his administration is “here to help.”

When asked if the city could reach full compliance without the CPOA portions of the CASA fulfilled, city and police officials replied, “Just barely.”  Keller said if the City Council doesn’t get the CPOA into compliance with the CASA, one option would be to split the CASA into two, calling the CPOA half “a little casita.”

REFORMS ACHIEVED UNDER THE CASA

On November 16, 2023, it was a full 9 years that has expired since the city entered into the CASA with the DOJ. It was originally agreed that implementation of all the settlement terms would be completed within 4 years, but because of previous delay and obstruction tactics  by APD management and the police officers’ union found by the Federal Monitor as well as APD backsliding in implementing the reforms, it has taken another 5 years to get the job done.

After 9 full years, the federal oversight and the CASA have produced results. Reforms achieved under the CASA can be identified and are as follows:

1. New “use of force” and “use of deadly force” policies have been written, implemented and all APD sworn have received training on the policies.
2. All sworn police officers have received crisis management intervention training.
3. APD has created a “Use of Force Review Board” that oversees all internal affairs investigations of use of force and deadly force.
4. The Internal Affairs Unit has been divided into two sections, one dealing with general complaints and the other dealing with use of force incidents.
5. Sweeping changes ranging from APD’s SWAT team protocols, to banning choke-holds, to auditing the use of every Taser carried by officers and re-writing and implementation of new use of force and deadly force policies have been completed.
6. “Constitutional policing” practices and methods, and mandatory crisis intervention techniques an de-escalation tactics with the mentally ill have been implemented at the APD police academy with all sworn police also receiving the training.
7. APD has adopted a new system to hold officers and supervisors accountable for all use of force incidents with personnel procedures implemented detailing how use of force cases are investigated.
8. APD has revised and updated its policies on the mandatory use of lapel cameras by all sworn police officers.
9. The Repeat Offenders Project, known as ROP, has been abolished.
10. Civilian Police Oversight Agency has been created, funded, fully staffed and a director was hired.
11. The Community Policing Counsels (CPCs) have been created in all area commands.
12. The Mental Health Advisory Committee has been implemented.
13. The External Force Investigation Team (EFIT) was created and is training the Internal Affairs Force Division on how to investigate use-of-force cases, making sure they meet deadlines and follow procedures.
14. Millions have been spent each year on new programs and training of new cadets and police officers on constitutional policing practices.
15. APD officers are routinely found using less force than they were before and well documented use of force investigations are now being produced in a timely manner.
16. APD has assumed the self-monitoring of at least 25% of the CASA reforms and is likely capable of assuming more.
17. The APD Compliance Bureau has been fully operational and staffed with many positions created dealing directly with all the reform efforts and all the duties and responsibilities that come with self-assessment.
18. APD has attained a 100% Primary Compliance rate, a 100% Secondary Compliance rate and a 96% Operational Compliance rate.

CITY SHOULD SEEK DISMISSAL OF CASE AND NOT WAITE ANOTHER 2 YEARS

Simply put, the Court Approved Settlement Agreement was never designed to guarantee or completely stop nor prevent police officer involved shootings, but it was  designed to implement constitutional policing practices, especially when dealing with the mentally ill.  There never was a guarantee that police officer shootings of civilians would simply never occur again even with training.  What the CASA reforms ensure is that police officers are being held accountable when they violate constitutional policing practices and peoples civil rights.  All that really can be done is to train and  implement constitutional policing practices in the hopes that it will bring down police officer shootings of civilians. 

Over the last 9 years, APD has devoted thousands of manhours and the city has spent millions of dollars on the reform process, creating and staffing entire divisions and roles and rewriting policies and procedures.  APD has implemented oversight outside of the CASA requirements, implementing 6-month reviews of police shootings to identify shortcomings and possible solutions.

Despite the fact that the Court Approved Settlement Agreement mandates 2 years of sustained compliance of all 3 levels, it can be said that the spirit and intent of the CASA have now been fully achieved.  Given the extent of the compliance levels, the work of the Federal Monitor is done. The purpose and intent of the settlement has been achieved and it should now be dismissed.

The city should seek to negotiate a stipulated dismissal of the case with the Department of Justice (DOJ) sooner rather than later.  Should the DOJ refuse, the City Attorney should move to immediately to dismiss the case under the termination and suspension provisions of the CASA by filing a Motion to Dismiss the case and force the issue with an evidentiary hearing and let the assigned federal judge decide the issue of dismissal.

Search Light New Mexico Article: “Can The Albuquerque Police Department ever be reformed?”; APD Ranks #1 In Civilian Killings Out Of The 50 Largest City Police Departments In The Country; APD Killing More People Than Ever Despite Implementation Of Reforms

On June 4, the 2024 election primary occurred.

Following are the primary election results for Bernalillo County

BERNALILLO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY) 

SAM BREGMAN            25,997                 56.34%  (INCUMBENT)

DAMON MARTINEZ        20,142                43.66%

District Attorney Sam Bregman has no Republican opponent in the November general election and therefore will be elected to a full 4 year term.

https://www.abqjournal.com/election/bregman-looks-to-second-term-after-victory/article_ec9322d2-2

BERNALILLO COUNTY COMMISSION DIST. 2  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

FRANK BACA                  4,045      73.37%

WILLIAM WALKER          1,468      26.63%

Frank Baca will face in the November general election Republican Kay Ingham who ran unopposed  in the Republican primary.

BERNALILLO COUNTY COMMISSION DIST. 3 (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)  

ADRIANN BARBOA         5,293    53.25%  (INCUMBENT)

ROBERT PADILLA           2,981    29.99%

LAURA NASARIA CHAVEZ     1,665    16.75%

 Incumbent County Commissioner Adriann Barboa will face in the November general election Republican Rene Coronado who ran unopposed Republican primary.

BERNALILLO COUNTY CLERK (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

MICHELLE KAVANAUGH   26,688            60.21%

KAREN MONTOYA              17,901           39.99%

https://www.abqjournal.com/election/new-faces-looking-to-take-legislative-seats-following-primary-wins/article_5baff5b0-22f4-11ef-a9c1-7bd674cd2504.html

BERNALILLO COUNTY CLERK (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

CLAY PRYOR                     14,166                 67,21%

ROBERT KWASNY               6,911                32.79%

Democrat Michelle Kavanaugh  will face Republican Clay Pryor in the November General Election .

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/democrat-kavanaugh-and-gops-pryor-take-leads-in-clerks-race/article_6fb36ab8-22ba-11ef-bc5e-97bd5f0a197a.html

BERNALILLO COUNTY TREASURER (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY) 

TIM EICHENBERG ENBERG    29,622                 66.88%

KENNETH SCOTT JR.               14,666                33.12%

Tim Eichenberg will face Republican Lelan Morrison in the November general election.

The link to relied upon news source is here:  https://results.bernco.gov/

SANTA FE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY 

The Santa Fe County District Attorney race was one of the most contentious races in the state.  Following are the results of that race:

SANTA FE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)  

MARY CARMACK-ALTWIES          16,145                 61.61%  (INCUMBENT)

MARCO SERNA                                 10,060               38.29%

NEW MEXICO STATE SENATE

Following are the results in the contested state senate races:

STATE SENATE DISTRICT 3  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

SHANNON PINTO                 2,290                      62.68%  (INCUMBENT)

SHERYLENE YAZZIE              1,352                    37.12%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT 4  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

GEORGE MUNOZ                    3, 289                   78.27%  (INCUMBENT)

KEITH HILLOCK                     913                         21.73%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT 8  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

PETE CAMPOS                      3,540      54.65%  (INCUMBENT)

MICHAEL LOPEZ                     2,938     45.35%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT 9  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

CINDY NAVA                    2,638      54.59%

HEATHER BALAS             2,194    45.41%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT 9  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

Frida Suasana Vasquez    748    41.99%

Audrey Trujillo                   853    58.01%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  11  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

LINDA LOPEZ                    1,445    81.45%  (INCUMBENT)

RICHARD CARRION           329    18.55%

THERE IS NO REPUBLICAN RUNNING IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  12  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

JAY BLOCK                                 1,917      67.91%

CANDACE GOULD                      906     32.09%

Jay Block will face Democrat Phillip Perez in the November general election.

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  13  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

DEBBIE O’MALLEY         2,297    52.03%

BILL O’NEILL                   2,118    47.97%  (INCUMBENT)

THERE IS NO REPUBLICAN RUNNING IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.

STATE SENATE DISTRICT 15 (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

HEATHER BERGHMANS     2,826      76.09%

DANIEL IVEY-SOTO              888        23.91% (INCUMBENT)

Heather Berghams will face Republican Craig Degenhart in the November general election.

STATE SENATE DISTRICT 21  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY) 

ATHENA CHRISTODOULOUN            2,826      76.09%

PHILIP SNEDEKER                               888        23.91%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT 21  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

NICOLE TOBIASSEN       1,832      43.96%

MICHAEL WIENER          1,269     30.45%

JOHN MORTON               1,066    25.58%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  23  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

TERRY ARAGON                   1,014      58.11%

MANNY GONZALES               731        41.89%

Republican TERRY ARAGON will face Democrat Incumbent State Senator harold Pope  in the November general election.            

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  24 (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY) 

LINDA TRUJILLO           3,612                      62.00%

ANNA HANSEN                1,314                   22.55%

VERONICA KRUPNICK     900                    15.45%

THERE IS NO REPUBLICAN RUNNING IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  26  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

ANTONIO MAESTAS            2,014      59.24%  (INCUMBENT)

JULIE RADOSLOVICH            1,386    40.76%

THERE IS NO REPUBLICAN RUNNING IN THE GENERAL ELECTION

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  27  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

PATRICK BOONE                2,442    43.20%

GREG NIBERT                    2,341    41.41%

LARRY MARKER                 870   15.39%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  30 (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY) 

ANGEL CHARLEY           1,929      63.31%

CLEMENTE SANCHEZ   1,118    36.69%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  32  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

CANDY SPENCE EZZELL     1,930      57.89%

CHAD HAMILL                        1,404     42.11%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  33  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

NICHOLAS PAUL                  2,639      50.31%

LYNN CRAWFORD                1,555     29.65%

RHONDA ROMACK                1,051    20.04%

STATE SENATE DISTRICT  42  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

LARRY SCOTT                               3,226     61.05%

STEVEN MCCUTCHEON                2,058    38.95%

STATE HOUSE RACES

Following are the results in the contested House races:

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 1  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

RODNEY MONTOYA       1,829    65.53%

KEITH NEIL                         962   34.47%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 4 (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

JOSEPH HERNANDEZ   549        50.79%

CHRISTINA  ASPAAS      318        33.12%

CHERYL GEORGE            174       16.10%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 6  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

ELISEO ALCON                 1,051    45.96%

PRISCILLA BENALLY          763     33.36%

DANIEL TORREZ                 473     20.68%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT  9 (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

PATRICIA LUNDSTROM                   1,429         61.92% (INCUMBENT)

CHRISTOPHER HUDSON                   679        29.42%

ARVAL MCCABE                                   200        8.67%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT  13  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

PATRICIA ROYBAL CABALLERO                     513        57.77%  (INCUMBENT)

TERESA GARCIA                                              375        42.23%

THERE IS NO REPUBLICAN RUNNING IN THE GENERAL ELECTION

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 16  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

YANIRA GURROLA VALENZUELA                 1,629      63.78%

MARSELLA DUARTE                                      925        36.22%

Democrat YANIRA GURROLA VALENZUELA will face Republican Leland Benwood Bohannnon  in the November general election.

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT  18 (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

MARIANNA   ANAYA        2,246      48.95%

ANJALI TANEJA              1,891    42.21%

GLORIA DOHERTY          342        7.45%

JUAN LARRANAGA        110        2.40%

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/state/anaya-wins-competitive-four-way-primary/article_abc2e558-3eff-596e-8690-f5e7a99564ec.html

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT  27 (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

MARIAN MATTHEWS         1,441      55.77% (INCUMBENT)

GREG SEELEY                   1,143    44.23%

Democrat Incumbent Marian Mathews will face Republican Gregory R. Gallegos in the November general election.

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 30 (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

JARED SECRET               734        54.29%

VICTORIA DORE              618        45.71%

Republican JARED SECRET will face Democrat Elixabeth Torrez-Velasquez in the November general election.

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT  31  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

NICOLE CHAVEZ            1,550    57.41%

SARAH JANE ALLEN      804        29.78%

PATRICK HUESTED        346        12.81%

Republican Nicole Chavez will face Democrat Vicky Estrada-Bustillo the November general election.

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 32  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

LINDA ALVAREZ              725        56.82%

ANDREW HERNANDEZ   551      41.18%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT  35  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)

ANGELICA RUBIO           1,089      61.35%

GABRIEL DURAN                686     38.65%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 39  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY) 

GABRIELLE BEGAY             2,297      80.23%

GILBERT GUADIANA              566     19.77%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT  50  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

KENNETH BRENNAN           985         59.73%

WENDY Ann LOSSING          664        40.27%

Republican WENDY Ann LOSSING will face Democrat  Matthew McQueen in the November general election.

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 41  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY) 

SUSAN HERRERA           2,390      63.48%

MARGARET CAMPOS     1,375     36.52%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 53  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)  

JON HILL                          630        58.06%

WILLIE MADRID              455        41.94%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 55  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

CATHRYNN BROWN            2,143      71.74%

JACK VOLPATO                     844       28.26%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT  57  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

CATHERINE CULLEN     522        37.50%

JOHN D’ANTONIO          458        32.90%

CORRINE RIOS                 412      29.60%

Republican CATHERINE CULLEN will face Democrat  MICHELLE SANDOVAL in the November general election.

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 59  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

JARED HEMBREE            2,495    74.84%

TRACY DE LA ROSA        839        25.16%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 62  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

ELAINE CORTEZ                              1,131    40.38%

DEBRA HICKS                                   1,082    38.63%

D’NAE ROBINETT MILLS                  568    20.99%

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 68  (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY)

NATHAN BROOKS                         710        58.53

VIRGINIA GONZALES                    503        41.97%

Republican Nathan Brooks will face Democrat  CHARLOTT LITTLE  in the November general election.

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT  69  (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)  

MICHELLE ABEYTA             1,340                      56.76%

HARRY GARCIA                   825                        34.94%

STANLEY MICHAEL             1,969                     44.76%

DEMOCRAT MICHELLE ABEYTA FACES NO OPPOSITION IN THE NOVEMBER ELECTION

STATE HOUSE DISTRICT  70 (DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY)  

ANITA GONZALES                       2,430               55.24%

AMBROSE CASTELLANO            1, 969              44.76

The links to quoted news sources are here:

https://www.krqe.com/election-results/?ipid=promo-link-block1

https://electionresults.sos.nm.gov/Default.aspx?

LOW VOTER TURNOUT

“Little more than 1 in 5 eligible voters turned out Tuesday in Bernalillo County,  a tally slightly lower than the 2022 primary contest.  Low turnout also marked the statewide results where  225,000 New Mexicans voted in the primary election, or about 22% of the state’s 1,011,000 eligible voters.

Excluded from voting Tuesday were the state’s approximately 326,000 registered voters who did not declare as Democrats, Republicans or Libertarians. In Bernalillo County, 71,733 votes were cast in the primaries, or about 22.6% of eligible voters, according to unofficial results.

Democrats turned out in greater numbers than Republicans in Bernalillo County.  About 47,500 Democrats cast primary votes, or about 66% of the total votes cast in the county. Republican voters cast 23,972 votes and Libertarians, 259 votes.

In total, Bernalillo County has about 199,209 registered Democratic voters, 117,889 Republican voters and 5,173 Libertarians, according to the New Mexico Secretary of State’s Office.

Turnout  …  was little different from the 2022 primary election, when 23% of eligible voters made their voices heard.”

The link to the quoted news source is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/election/turnout-just-over-22-in-bernalillo-county-primary-elections/article_d29dd3a8-22f5-11ef-9252-0f90c0540bab.html

COMMENTARY ANALYSIS

Despite being a very low voter turn out, election night  in the Democratic primary was clearly a major victory for Progressives within the party. It  saw progressives defeating incumbent State Senator Daniel Ivey-Soto  and ousting conservative House Democrats Ambrose Castellano, Willie Madrid and Harry Garcia, all while bolstering turnout among women voters.  Ambrose Castellano  was defeated 55% to 45%  by Governor Lujan Grisham  endorsed Anita Gonzales in District 70 in the Las Vegas area, and in House District 69  incumbent  Representative Harry Garcia was beaten  in a 3 way race to Michelle Abeyta, a lawyer and Navajo nation member. Representative Willie Madrid of House District 53 near Las Cruces was  defeated by progressive Democrat Dr. Jon Hill, a lifelong educator. Long time State  Senator  Bill O’Neill was unable to fend off and aggressive campaign and lost to progressive and former Bernalillo County  Commissioner Debbie O’Malley 52% to 48%.

https://www.abqjournal.com/election/new-faces-looking-to-take-legislative-seats-following-primary-wins/article_5baff5b0-22f4-11ef-a9c1-7bd674cd2504.html

There were two major  losses for progressive Democrats. Albuquerque Democrat State Representative Marian Matthews came under severe attack from Progressive Greg Seeley for voting against the family medical leave act but Matthews defended her vote and defended her seat by defeating Seeley with 56% of the vote.  Although Matthews represents a conservative leaning district, she does  stick with the Democratic party on most votes.   Another defeat for progressives was  State Senator Moe Maestas who successfully beat an aggressive challenge  by  JULIE RADOSLOVICH beating her 59.24%  to  40.76%.

Congratulations to all the victors and on to the November general election.

 

 

www.PeteDinelli.com will be on hiatus until June 4. Please feel free to use the search engine block on the above right hand to search for past articles published on topics of interest or published over the last 6 years. Just type in a topic (ie: homeless, DOJ Fed. Monitors Reports, NM legislature, City Council etc. or names of elected officials) and blog articles written will appear.

Below is a list of  recent blog articles published since January 1, 2024 you might find interesting (NOTE; The list does NOT include 2024 NM legislative updates published):

Conservative City Council Continues With Personal Vendetta Against Mayor Tim Keller And His Progressive Agenda; Council Proposes Sweeping City Charter Amendments To Impact Mayor Keller Re-Election Chances And To Give City Council More Power Over Appointments If He Is Re Elected, Which Is A Big If

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/05/17/conservative-city-council-continues-with-personal-vendetta-against-mayor-tim-keller-and-his-progressive-agenda-council-proposes-sweeping-city-charter-amendments-to-impact-mayor-keller-re-election-cha/

New Mexico Supreme Court Again Revises Pre Trial Detention Rules; Court Reflects Sensitivity To Revolving Door Accusations

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/05/16/new-mexico-supreme-court-again-revises-pre-trial-detention-rules-court-reflects-sensitivity-to-revolving-door-accusations/

APD Has Achieved Compliance Levels Mandated By Court Approved Settlement Agreement; City Should Seek Immediate Dismissal Of Case And Not Be Required To Waite 2 More Years

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/05/15/apd-has-achieved-compliance-levels-mandated-by-court-approved-settlement-agreement-city-should-seek-immediate-dismissal-of-case-and-not-be-required-to-waite-2-more-years/

APD’s Performance Base Budget Statistics Reflects APD Falling Short On Its Public Safety Mission; 15 Years of Sworn Personnel Meltdown Under Mayors Berry and Keller; APD Sworn Goes From 1,100 To 856 With Zero Growth; Exploring Reason For Meltdown; Citizens Satisfaction Survey: Public Has Lost Confidence In APD

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/05/14/apds-performance-base-budget-statistics-reflects-apd-falling-short-on-its-public-safety-mission-15-years-of-sworn-personnel-meltdown-under-mayors-berry-and-keller-apd-swor/

ABQ Journal Dinelli Guest Opinion Column: “Survey Says Public Has Lost Confidence In APD”; Mayor Tim Keller Should Be Denied A Third Term

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/05/13/abq-journal-dinelli-guest-opinion-column-survey-says-public-has-lost-confidence-in-apd-mayor-tim-keller-should-be-denied-a-third-term/

Key Takeaways From US Supreme Court Arguments On Trump’s Absolute Immunity Claims; Court Likely To Send Back To Lower Courts; Trump Supreme Court Disciples Give Trump Another Gift Of Delay

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/04/26/key-takeaways-from-us-supreme-court-arguments-on-trumps-absolute-immunity-claims-court-likely-to-send-back-to-lower-courts-trump-supreme-court-disciples-give-trump-another-gift-of-delay/

Gov. MLG To Call Special Session On July 18; Focus To Be Public Safety; Special Session Should Include Creating State Wide Mental Health Court For Civil Mental Health Commitments To Assist Mentally ILL,  Drug Addicted And Unhoused

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/04/17/gov-mlg-to-call-special-session-on-july-18-focus-to-be-public-safety-special-session-should-include-creating-state-wide-mental-health-court-for-civil-mental-health-commitments-to-assist-mentally-il/

ABQ Journal Dinelli Guest Opinion Column: “Lawmakers should set up statewide mental health court”; Related Column: Laws, Statistics, and Resources Needed To Create 14th Judicial District Court For Mental Health Commitment Court

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/04/15/abq-journal-dinelli-guest-opinion-column-lawmakers-should-set-up-statewide-mental-health-court-related-column-laws-statics-and-resources-needed-to-create-14th-judicial-dis/

Albuquerque Journal Pete Dinelli Guest Opinion Column “Chief Medina Should Be Fired And Prosecuted In Connection to Crash”

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/03/08/albuquerque-journal-pete-dinelli-guest-opinion-column-chief-medina-should-be-fired-and-prosecuted-in-connection-to-crash/

US Supreme Court To Hear Trump’s Claims Of Immunity from Criminal Prosecution; Republican US Supreme Court Trump Disciples Hand Trump “Gift Of Delay”

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/03/07/us-supreme-court-to-hear-trumps-claims-of-immunity-from-criminal-prosecution-republican-us-supreme-court-trump-disciples-hand-trump-gift-of-delay/

Trump Sweeps March 5 Super Tuesday Republican Primaries; Supreme Court Rules State’s Can Not Disqualify Trump From Ballot; Update On Trump’s Criminal Charges And Civil Cases; Criminal Convictions Will Likely Not Make Any Difference As Trump Becomes Presumptive Republican Nominee

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/03/06/trump-sweeps-march-5-super-tuesday-republican-primaries-supreme-court-rules-states-can-not-disqualify-trump-from-ballot-update-on-trumps-criminal-charges-and-civil-cases-criminal/

Gov. MLG Signs 4 Public Safety Measures; Special Session Still Under Consideration; Convene Special Session To Enact “Omnibus Gun Control And Violent Crime Sentencing Act” And Expand Existing Mental Health Court Statewide

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/03/05/gov-mlg-signs-4-public-safety-measures-special-session-still-under-consideration-convene-special-session-to-enact-omnibus-gun-control-and-violent-crime-sentencing-act-and-expand-e/

APD Releases 2023 Crime Statistics Reflecting 19% Decline In Homicides; Reflects National Trend Not Success Of Mayor Tim Keller’s Programs To Bring Down Crime

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/03/04/apd-releases-2023-crime-statistics-reflecting-19-decline-in-homicides-reflects-national-trend-not-success-of-mayor-tim-kellers-programs-to-bring-down-crime/

Convening Special Session Of NM Legislator For Public Safety Must Include Expanding Existing Mental Health Court; Create New 14th Judicial District Court With 3 Regional Divisions For Mental Health Commitment Hearings; Build Regional Treatment Facilities And Hospitals For Mandatory Treatment Ordered

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/02/29/convening-special-session-of-nm-legislator-for-public-safety-must-include-expanding-existing-mental-health-court-create-new-14th-judicial-district-court-with-3-regional-divisions-for-mental-hea/

Governor MLG Considers Calling Special Session To Deal With Public Safety Issues; It’s About Time!

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/02/27/governor-mlg-considers-calling-special-session-to-deal-with-public-safety-issues-its-about-time/

Video Of DWI Arrest Reveals How DWI Dismissal Bribery Corruption Scheme Worked; Hideous Shake Down By One Of Albuquerque’s  Finest Caught On Tape; Fully Investigate, Prosecute And Disbarment Only Beginning To Restore Faith In APD And Criminal Justice System

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/02/26/video-of-dwi-arrest-reveals-how-dwi-dismissal-bribery-corruption-scheme-worked-hideous-shake-down-by-one-of-albuquerques-finest-caught-on-tape-fully-investigate-prosecute-and-disbarment-onl/

Mayor Keller Proclaims Critically Injured Driver Involved In Chief’s Accident “Wrong Place At The Wrong Time”; APD Family Ride Policy Under Scrutiny After Chief Medina’s Weekend Crash; Both Keller And Medina Are Embarrassment With Their Words And Actions

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/02/23/mayor-keller-proclaims-critically-injured-driver-involved-in-chiefs-accident-wrong-place-at-the-wrong-time-apd-family-ride-policy-under-scrutiny-after-chief-medina/

Released Video Of Chief Medina’s Car Crash Contradicts Medina’s Version Of Events; Medina And Keller Claim Medina Victim; APD Launches Internal Affairs Investigation And Motor Unit Investigation;  Place Medina On Administrative Leave And Request BCSO Or State Police To Investigate Incident

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/02/22/released-video-of-chief-medinas-car-crash-contradicts-medinas-version-of-events-medina-and-keller-claim-medina-victim-apd-launches-internal-affairs-investigation-and-motor-unit-inv/

2024 NM Legislature Update: What Passed, What Signed, What Failed

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/02/20/2024-nm-legislative-update-what-passed-what-signed-what-failed/

DWI Defense Attorney Had 88% DWI Dismissal Rate Involving Officers Under Federal Investigation; 40 More Cases Dismissed Bringing Total To 195; APD Investigation Team Announced; Case Dismissal Time Line; APD Had No System To Track Cops Failure To Appear; Medina “Pivots, Deflects, Lays Blame, Takes Credit” And He Should Be Removed As Chief

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/02/07/dwi-defense-attorney-had-88-dwi-dismissal-rate-involving-officers-under-federal-investigation-40-more-cases-dismissed-bringing-total-to-195-apd-investigation-team-announced-case-dismiss/

ABQ Journal Guest Opinion Columns: “Mayor Keller and Chief Medina Must Be Held Accountable For DWI Scandal”; “Lack Of Leadership Has Ruined Moral Within APD”; Will City Council Vote No Confidence In Medina?; Keller Should Terminate And Replace APD Chief Harold Medina

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/02/05/abq-journal-guest-opinion-columns-mayor-keller-and-chief-medina-must-be-held-accountable-for-dwi-scandal-lack-of-leadership-has-ruined-moral-within-apd-will-city/

City Council, Public Defender and County Sherriff John Allen Push Back At Chief Medina And Mayor Keller Over Who Responsible For APD Police DWI Bribery Scandal; “Pivot, Deflect And Blame” Is Name Of Game For Keller And Medina; Time  For Mayor Keller To Invite Chief Medina To A “Geier Walk In The Park”

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/01/29/city-council-public-defender-and-county-sherriff-john-allen-push-back-at-chief-medina-and-mayor-keller-over-who-responsible-for-apd-police-dwi-bribery-scandal-pivot-deflect-and-blame/

“Dynamic Duo Of Police Reform” Mayor Tim Keller and Chief Harold Medina “Decry APD Corruption” They Allowed To Fester; Both Enter “Spin Cycle” Saying They Are Washing Stain Of Corruption Out Of APD; Both Break Silence  And Pivot, Deflect And Refuse To Admit Management Failures In APD DWI Bribery Scandal; Accuse City Council Of Unethical Conduct

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/01/24/dynamic-duo-of-police-reform-mayor-tim-keller-and-chief-harold-medina-decry-apd-corruption-they-allowed-to-fester-both-enter-spin-cycle-saying-they/

ABQ City Councilors React To APD Bribery Scandal By Complaining Mayor Tim Keller Did Not Communicate With Them; Alarming Disclosure Made That Scandal Problem Goes Back A Decade; Council Fails Leadership Role To Make Demands To Address Scandal Itself; The DWI Unit Should Be Dismantled And Reconstituted With All New Staffing To Restore Credibility  

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/01/23/abq-city-councilors-react-to-apd-bribery-scandal-by-complaining-mayor-tim-keller-did-not-communicate-with-them-alarming-disclosure-made-that-problem-goes-back-a-decade-council-fails-lead/

FBI Agents Raid The Homes of 3 APD Police Officers, 1 Criminal Defense Attorney Ostensibly Over Scheme To Dismiss DWI Cases; DA Forced To Dismiss 152 DWI Cases; Mayor Keller Should Dismantle And Reconstitute Entire DWI Unit;  Scandal Discredits APD’s Professed Values of “Pride, Integrity, Fairness And Respect”

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/01/22/fbi-agents-raid-the-homes-of-3-apd-police-officers-1-criminal-defense-attorney-ostensibly-over-scheme-to-dismiss-dwi-cases-da-forced-to-dismiss-152-dwi-cases-mayor-keller-should-dismantle-and-recon/

Murders In City Down By 20%; First Decline After 5 Full Years Of Historical Highs; Clearance Rates Up After Historical Lows; Old Fashion Police Work Brought Homicides Down, Not Keller’s “Show And Tell” Programs Of “Trying To Get People Not To Shoot Each Other”; Juveniles Involvement Concerns APD And District Attorney

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/01/19/murders-in-city-down-by-20-first-decline-after-5-full-years-of-historical-highs-clearance-rates-up-after-historical-lows-old-fashion-police-work-brought-homicides-down-not-kellers/

Despite Democrats Holding 5-4 City Council Majority, Conservative Republican City Councilors Dan Lewis and Renee Grout Elected President and Vice President Of City Council; Progressive Democrat Mayor Tim Keller Now Faced With New Conservative Majority; “Rubber Stamp Trio” Of  Progressive Democrats Joaquin Baca,  Nichole Rogers, Tammy Fiebelkorn Will Likely  Be Marginalized By Conservative Majority

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/01/09/despite-democrats-holding-5-4-city-council-majority-conservative-republican-city-councilors-dan-lewis-and-renee-grout-elected-president-and-vice-president-of-city-council-progressive-democrat/

APD Praised In Status Hearing Over Reform Efforts; APD Reports Use Of Force Cases Are Down; Reflection The DOJ Reforms Are Working; Full Compliance Of Court Approved Settlement Expected By 2026; City Should Move To Dismiss Case Sooner Rather Than Later

https://www.petedinelli.com/2024/01/08/apd-praised-in-status-hearing-over-reform-efforts-apd-reports-use-of-force-cases-are-down-reflection-the-doj-reforms-are-working-full-compliance-of-court-approved-settlement-expected-by-2026-city/

APD Takes Over Police Use Of Force Cases From External Force Investigations Team; Sharp Turn Around From When DOJ Threatened To Seek Contempt Of Court For APD’s Willful Failure To Investigate 667 Use Of Force Cases; Case Backlog Down To 197 Cases; City Should Move To Dismiss Case Because Of 94% Or Better In Compliance Levels

APD Takes Over Police Use Of Force Cases From External Force Investigations Team; Sharp Turn Around From When DOJ Threatened To Seek Contempt Of Court For APD’s Willful Failure To Investigate 667 Use Of Force Cases; Case Backlog Down To 197 Cases; City Should Move To Dismiss Case Because Of 94% Or Better In Compliance Levels

 

Conservative Republican City Council President Dan Lewis is leading the charge with sponsorship of 4  major new city charter amendments proposing sweeping changes to Albuquerque’s City Charter and the way city government is run.  Lewis suggests that the amendments are all about giving city councilors, and by extension voters, a little more power in how the city is governed.

The first charter amendment sponsored by Republican Dan Lewis and co-sponsored by Democrat Councilor Klarissa Pena would lower the minimum vote total to win a mayor or city council race to 40% instead of the current 50%. If no candidate hits 40%, then there would be a runoff.

In 2009, the city  had a 40% threshold for elections, but that was changed by voters to 50% after Mayor Richard Berry was elected defeating 3 term Mayor Marty Chavez.  In 2009 Mayor’s race, Richard Berry received 44% of the vote  with 36,466 votes, Mayor Marty Chavez received 36% of the vote  with 29,140 votes and former State Senator Richard Romero received 20%  of the vote with17,458 votes. Richard Romero divided the Democratic Party vote thereby delivering the race to Richard Berry.

City Councilor Dan Lewis had this to say about the vote change :

“[It’s] been a decade ago and the result of that has been more runoff elections. The city spends an incredible amount of money on runoff elections and voters just have to go to the polls twice to vote.  So, you could say we want people’s vote to count. …  This is an opportunity to be able to [have] full transparent elections where every vote in the city of Albuquerque counts. And so it brings the threshold to where we reduce the amount of run-offs that happen amongst city council races and the mayor’s race, and we give opportunities for people that have a majority vote to be elected.”

Lewis  has failed to acknowledge that in  3 out 4 of the past most recent elections for Mayor, there has been no run off.  It was in  his race in 2017 when Lewis  lost to Mayor Tim Keller  that there was a run off. In the 2009, 2013 and the 2021 elections for Mayor there was no run off.

The second and third charter amendments would give the city council a bigger role in the appointment and removal processes for the key city positions of city attorney, city clerk, fire chief and police chief. The second charter amendment proposal would create a committee to recommend selections for city attorney and city clerk with the council still making the final approval. The Mayor would still have a major say when it comes to picking people to fill those positions, but Lewis says it’s time city councilors get a say too. Lewis said this:

“The city council is closer to the districts, to the people in our city that are affected by these leadership areas. …  It’s important that the council is able to weigh in, have a legitimate role in these incredibly important positions. … They work for us, they work for the entire city, not just the mayor. And so this is, again, it gives a legitimate role to the city council that’s closer to the city of the people, the City of Albuquerque, to have a legitimate role in bringing about some of these key executive leaders in our city.”  

The charter amendment that would be sent to voters if approved by the Council states: 

“The Police Chief and Fire Chief shall have an employment agreement with the City specifying the terms and conditions of employment including a provision for early termination of employment. The Mayor may terminate either employment of the Police Chief or the Fire Chief at any time. The Council may terminate the agreement at any time, with notice to the Mayor and affected Chief, by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the entire membership of the Council.”

The fourth charter amendment centers on the separation of powers ensuring the Conference Committee has enough appointees to resolve issues between the mayor and city council. The sponsors say the changes would streamline and add transparency to city elections and hiring procedures.

All four of the Charter Amendment will have to clear the city council before they  are put  on the November ballot unless the Mayor vetoes the measures and the council does not vote override the vetoes. If the legislation clears city council, it would go directly to voters for their approval.

MAYOR TIM KELLER REACTS

Mayor Tim Keller said the proposals threaten the efficiency and integrity of city government. Mayor Tim Keller issued the  following statement in response to the proposed charter amendments:

“A group of City Councilors is introducing a slate of charter amendments under the guise of streamlining City government procedures for hiring selection and City elections, but these charter amendments reflect the opposite of transparency and efficiency. It is unfortunate that faced with crime and homelessness, a group of Councilors are wasting time on the politics of power, instead of bringing real solutions to the table” 

“Our community expects, and deserves, us to be focused on tackling crime and finding solutions to curb homelessness, not wasting time on distractions that are ultimately political ploys for power,” said Mayor Tim Keller. “I’m always open to a charter reform task force and community discussion, but over-politicizing police and fire, removing safeguards for patronage and corruption, and ignoring the public’s referendum for ‘majority wins’ elections, is simply out of step with what our city needs.” 

“One proposal would modify the minimum votes required for candidates for Mayor or Councilor from 50% down to 40% of the total number of votes cast. This proposal is not only undemocratic, it reverses an 11 year old public referendum, when voters decided that our elected leaders should be elected with a majority of the votes to hold office. Further, the proposal would not eliminate the need for runoff elections.” 

“They are also suggesting that our City change the procedures to appoint and remove the City Attorney, City Clerk, and Chiefs of Police and Fire. These ‘govern by committee’ proposed changes would erase critical checks and balances that are in place to prevent corruption and patronage. They would essentially make these key city jobs “at-will,” and beholden to the needs of a few council districts, rather than the city as whole – as represented by the Mayor. The additional bureaucracy, creating 10 bosses for most executives, would politicize recruiting and promotion of professionals, create more turnover, and weaken the stability of police and fire leadership that our community relies on.” 

“Given the enormity of the potential impact and the number of changes, the appropriate course of action would be to convene a Charter Review Task Force made up of City Council, the administration, and other representatives.”

Links to quoted and relied upon news sources are here:

https://www.kob.com/new-mexico/city-councilors-to-discuss-changes-in-city-ordinances-and-immigrant-friendly-policies/

https://www.krqe.com/news/politics-government/three-albuquerque-city-councilors-propose-changes-to-city-charter/’

https://www.yahoo.com/news/three-albuquerque-city-councilors-propose-232517785.html

https://www.abqjournal.com/opinion/opinion-proposed-charter-changes-would-alter-balance-of-power-and-could-bring-chaos/article_9d9d9670-121a-11ef-8f7c-37b8c7532d2c.html

https://www.cabq.gov/mayor/news/proposed-charter-changes-threaten-efficiency-and-integrity-of-city-government

CITY COUNCIL MORE CONSERVATIVE AND MORE COMBATIVE TO KELLER

On January 1, 2024  the new city council after the November, 2023 election was sworn into office. The philosophical breakdown of the city council  is as follows:

Democrats

District 1 Conservative Democrat Louie Sanchez
District 2 Progressive Democrat Joaquin Baca
District 3 Moderate Democrat Klarissa Peña
District 6 Progressive Democrat Nichole Rogers
District 7 Progressive Democrat Tammy Fiebelkorn

Republicans

District 5 Conservative Republican Dan Lewis
District 4 Conservative Republican Brook Bassan
District 8 Conservative Republican Dan Champine
District 9 Conservative Republican Renee Grout

Although the City Council is split with 5 Democrats and 4 Republicans, Conservative Democrat Louie Sanchez has often allied himself with conservative Republicans Dan Lewis, Renee Grout, and Brook Bassan and Dan Champine to approve or kill measures on a 5-4 vote but being unable to override Mayor Tim Keller’s veto’s with the required 6 votes.

The first item of business of the new city council once they were sworn in on January 1, 2024 was the election of a new City Council President and Vice President. It came as no surprise that Conservative Democrat City Councilor Louis Sanchez voted for Republican Dan Lewis as the new City Council President and voted Republican Renee Grout for Vice President with the votes being Sanchez, Lewis, Bassan, Champine and Grout.

COUNCIL OVERIDES TWO PROGESSIVE KELLER VETOS

Notwithstanding the Democrat majority, the new more conservative city council began to show resistance to Mayor Keller’s progressive agenda as going too far.  In November, Republican City Councilor Dan Lewis sponsored two separate resolutions, one to replace the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board and another to place on hold the boards plans to dramatically change environmental justice regulations by increasing regulations and prohibitions on the issuance of air quality permits. The resolution increased regulations and prohibitions on the issuance of air quality permits and mandated excessive environmental studies. The Air Quality Board was conducting hearings on the environmental justice regulations. Mayor Tim Keller vetoed both resolutions. The City Council voted  to override both vetoes with bi partisan votes, one on a 6 to 3 vote and the other on a 7 to 2 vote.

https://www.koat.com/article/a-vote-from-city-council-that-could-change-the-albuquerque-air-quality-control-board/46021734

On April 27, 2023 first term City Councilors Democrat Louie Sanchez and Republican Renee Grout announced legislation proposing a City Charter amendment for a public vote that would have made the Mayor of Albuquerque a member of the City Council.  They wanted to transfer all the mayor’s executive and city management duties to a city manager chosen by the city council. According to the proposed legislation, the mayor would “be recognized as the head of the City government for all ceremonial purposes”.  The legislation was never vetted, researched or recommended for approval by the City Charter Review Task Force responsible for making recommendations for charter amendments.

Under the proposed legislation, a “professional” city manager would be selected by the City Council to oversee and manage all 27 city departments and directors. The city’s existing Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) already serves this function and presumably would be abolished. The city manager would administer the city’s personnel rules and regulations for the over 7,000 city employees.  The City manager would be responsible to prepare and formulate the city’s annual operating budget for city council review and adoption.

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

It was in 2017 that there were 8 candidates for Mayor and at the time unless one candidate achieved 50% of the vote, a runoff was required between the two top vote getters.  It was  Tim Keller and Dan Lewis who made it into the runoff and ran against each other for Mayor. Then Democrat State Auditor Tim Keller was a mere one year into his 4-year term as State Auditor. Then Republican District 5 City Councilor Dan Lewis gave up his seat after serving 2 terms on the city council to run for Mayor.

Keller won the 2017 runoff by a decisive landslide with 62.20% by securing 60,219 votes to Lewis 37.8% who secured 36,594 votes. Fast forward to 2021when Mayor Tim Keller ran for a second term and was elected over Democrat Bernalillo County Sherriff Manny Gonzales and radio talk show host Republican Eddy Aragon. Democrat Mayor Keller won his 2021 election to a second 4 year term with 56% of the final vote and beating Democrat  Sheriff Manny Gonzales who secured 26% of the vote and Republican  Radio Shock Jock Eddy Aragon who  secured 18% of the vote.

In 2017, Republican Dan Lewis ran to regain his city council seat and defeated incumbent Cynthia Borrego who later was elected a Westside Side NM State Representative. From day one of being sworn into office as a city councilor for his third term, Dan Lewis  made it known privately that he intended  to run for Mayor again in 2025, perhaps again against Tim Keller. With that in mind, Lewis has carried on a very personal vendetta against all things Mayor Keller and Keller’s progressive agenda with the goal of running for Mayor again in 2025, especially against Keller. Lewis has carried out his plans with the assistance of a more conservative city council.

DAN LEWIS HISTORY OF A PERSONAL VENDETTA

On January 10, 2022 at the very first meeting of the Alquerque City Council, newly sworn in District 5 Republican Dan Lewis announced the introduction of 4 major resolutions he was sponsoring to undercut Mayor Tim Keller and his  progressive agenda. The resolutions are summarized and how they  fared are as follows:

A RESOLUTION REPEAL OR LIMITING MAYORAL AUTHORITY DURING A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY

Early in the COVID-19 pandemic when Democrats had a 6 to 4 majority, the council expanded the Mayor’s authority during a public health crisis. On March 10, 2022, the Albuquerque City Council voted to narrowly reverse the City Councils 2020 action. The Council passed legislation on a 5 to 4 vote, with Republican Councilors, Dan Lewis, Brook Bassan, Renee Grout, Trudy Jones and lone Democrat Louie Sanchez voting in support and all 4 remaining Democrats voting no.

The council voted to revoke Mayor Tim Keller’s power to do such things as ordering closures of streets or places of mass gatherings, canceling city events and reallocating up to $1 million in the city budget. Under the enacted ordinance, the Mayor was relegated only with the ability to merely make “advisories and recommendations.”

Councilor Dan Lewis proposed the changes, saying Keller had hardly invoked his powers and mostly deferred to orders issued by New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s administration.  Keller ultimately vetoed the legislation. Overriding a mayoral veto takes 6 votes, but only 5 councilors supported the override during the March 21 city council meeting and they were Republicans Bassan, Grout, Jones, Lewis and Democrat Sanchez.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/new-mexico/articles/2022-03-10/albuquerque-council-votes-to-rein-in-mayors-crisis-powers

https://www.santafenewmexican.com/ap/albuquerque-council-votes-to-rein-in-mayors-crisis-powers/article_ad6ad126-6fbb-553a-b168-c1c2b2a7dc46.html

A RESOLUTION BARING THE CITY FROM MANDATING COVID-19 VACCINES FOR THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT WORKFORCE

Lewis initially said the bill answered concerns from police officers and firefighters. It is well settled law that private business can impose vaccine mandates to protect their workforce and the public they interact with. The city is no different. Unvaccinated police and fire officers can easily catch and spread the virus endangering public health, safety and welfare.

Notwithstanding, on March 21, the Council passed legislation on a 5 to 4 vote, with Republican Councilors, Dan Lewis, Brook Bassan, Renee Grout, Trudy Jones and lone Democrat Louie Sanchez voting in support and all 4 remaining Democrats voting no. The resolution would have  barred the city from mandating that employees get vaccinated and from penalizing those who do not.

Lewis himself admitted the city could not control what the federal or state governments might ultimately require, but said the legislation would demonstrate that the local government itself would not impose a vaccine standard and he said:

“Our policy will not be to mandate vaccines on our city employees and would give them the peace of mind (that) they wouldn’t have to make a decision between taking a vaccine they may not want or need and their jobs.”

Democrats City Councilors Pat Davis, Isaac Benton, Tammy Fiebelkorn and Klarissa Peña voted in opposition, and rightly so saying the city should not cede its ability to regulate its workforce because the public relies heavily on services and having “the staff available to them.” Not requiring inoculation of city employees and then allowing those same city employees to deal with the general public no likely creates a liability issue for the city if a member of the public becomes infected with COVID by a city employee.

The link to quoted news source material is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/2481514/city-council-votes-to-prohibit-employee-vaccine-mandates.html

RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO CONSIDER AND “PUSH TO RENEGOTIATE THE TERMS OF THE FEDERAL COURT APPROVED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (CASA)”

On March 10, 2022 the Albuquerque City Council passed a resolution directing city officials “to the extent advisable” to “petition” to reopen and renegotiate the Court Approved Settlement Agreement mandating the reforms of the Albuquerque Police Department. The council resolution passed on an 8-to-1 vote with City Councilor Tammy Fiebelkorn the only councilor to vote against the resolution.

The city council resolution says the “petition” should address recommendations contained in a released by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland on September 13, 2021, including putting a cap on how much an independent monitor overseeing court-mandated reforms can be paid and assessing ending the monitorship after 5 years. The problem is the Garland recommendations apply to future consent decrees and have no binding effect on the City’s Court approved settlement agreement.

The resolution enacted by the city council for the city to renegotiate “to the extent advisable” the Court Approved Settlement Agreement is a reflection of sure ignorance on the part of the City Council and the reforms mandated. It was the epitome of meaningless fluff. It reflects that the city council did not have a basic understanding of the court process nor the true meaning of a federal court order.

Simply put, there was nothing to negotiate. The city and the DOJ entered into a binding court order settlement agreement on what APD needs to do to come into compliance before the case can be dismissed. Because the settlement is a court approved order, any and all changes, even if agreed to by the Department of Justice and the city, must be approved by the Federal Judge.

DEMANDING RECONFIRMATION TO CONFIRM TO CARRY OUT PERSONAL VENDETTA

Mayor Tim Keller was sworn in for his second term on January 1, 2022. City Councilors Republican Dan Lewis and Democrat Louis Sanchez were also sworn in on January 1^st, 2022.

Mayor Keller chose NOT to replace Chief Administrative Officer Sarita Nair, Chief Operations Officer Lawrence Rael, City Clerk Ethan Watson, City Attorney Esteban Aguilar, APD Chief Harold Medina and Albuquerque Fire and Rescue Chief Gene Gallegos. All 6 of Keller’s top executives continued to do their jobs after Keller was sworn in. The council confirmed all 6 during Keller’s first term and each was approved by a unanimous vote.

Within weeks after Lewis and Sanchez were sworn in, they began to demand that Mayor Tim Keller again nominate Nair, Rael, Watson, Aguilar, Medina and Gallegos so they could hold confirmation hearings and be allowed to vote to reject them for the positions they held. The councilors said  the City Charter requires a fresh confirmation in a mayor’s new term.

The City Charter requires the council’s “advice and consent” for just a few positions the mayor appoints. Those positions are Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) , Deputy CAOs, Police Chief, Fire Chief, City Clerk and City Attorney. The City Charter provides that appointees requiring city council approval “shall be presented to the Council for confirmation within 45 days after the Mayor takes office.” The City Charter contains no provisions mandating that the Mayor nominate his top ranking executives a second time so that a newly elected city councilor can confirm.

Mayor Keller disputed the city council’s right to another confirmation vote, but forwarded City Clerk Ethan Watson and City Attorney Esteban Aguilar Jr., for another vote. Both have held the roles since Keller’s first term and previously went through council confirmation. Keller said the charter differentiates the clerk and attorney from the other positions, specifically stating that the clerk and attorney appointments “shall be for a term that coincides and terminates with the term of the Mayor making the appointment.” It does not use the same language for the other positions.

In the interest of compromise, Mayor Keller forwarded the names of Chief Administrative Officer Sarita Nair, Chief Operations Officer Lawrence Rael, APD Chief Harold Medina and Albuquerque Fire and Rescue Chief Gene Gallegos in the form of an “executive communication” that required that they all be confirmed with a single vote, not separate votes and as a “package deal”.

On March 11, Mayor Tim Keller announced in a statement that Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) Sarita Nair resigned her position. Nair had  been the city’s chief administrative officer since late 2017 when she was confirmed by a unanimous city council vote. No reasons were given for her sudden resignation and the city and Nair declined all requests to interview CAO Nair.  Confidential sources confirmed that Sarita Nair did not have the confidence and support of Democrat City Councilors Isaac Benton and Pat Davis. When you add Republican’s Dan Lewis and Renee Grout and “Democrat In Name Only” Louis Sanchez to the mix, it’s likely that CAO Sarita Nair would not have been confirmed.

https://www.petedinelli.com/2022/03/12/abqs-city-chief-administrative-officer-sarita-nair-resigns-from-200000-job-no-reasons-given-for-departure-are-there-any-others/

CONFIRMATION HEARINGS USED TO INTIMDATE AND SHAME

It became painfully obvious that the only reason why Republican City Councilor Dan Lewis and Democrat Louie Sanchez demanded Keller’s top executives previously confirmed be re submitted for a second time for confirmation was to try and shame and intimate them and to vote against them.

On March 7, City Clerk Ethan Watson was confirmed on a 7-2 bipartisan vote of the city council. Republican Dan Lewis and Democrat Louie  Sanchez crossed examined Watson over his job performance during the 2021 municipal election. Both Lewis and Sanchez questioned Watson’s impartiality in administering the city’s taxpayer-funded public campaign finance system, ignoring the fact that Watson is license attorney and as such an officer of the court who has taken an oath of office himself.

Lewis focused on Watson’s move to reject mayoral candidate Manuel Gonzales’ application for the money on the grounds he’d submitted fraudulent documentation, questioning if he’d applied the same scrutiny to Keller’s campaign. Lewis ignored that a state judge ultimately upheld Watson’s decision. Lewis at one point became very condensing and mean spirited when he asked Watson “how we can trust you moving forward in future elections?”. This coming from Dan Lewis who engaged in smear tactics and lies against his opponent incumbent Democrat Cynthia Borrego to get elected saying she was in favor of “sanctuary city polices” and the releasing of violent criminals. Dan Lewis’ paid Republican Political Operative Jay McClusky to run his campaign.

Not at all surprisingly, Sanchez claimed his own 2021 city council campaign race against incumbent Lan Sena was treated unfairly by Ethan Watson, even though Sanchez won the race. It was Sanchez who proclaimed he was the rightful city councilor to have been elected and demanded that Watson swear him in before the term he was elected began on January 1, 2022. Sanchez wanted to vote against legislation that was pending and sponsored by outgoing City Councilor Lan Sena and his demands were essentially an effort to shame former City Councilor Lan Sena.

The link to quoted news source material is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/2478932/city-clerk-is-reconfirmed-despite-litany-of-questions.html

PREQUELL TO 2025 MAYOR’S RACE

It is common knowledge that Mayor Tim Keller is seeking a third term as Mayor in 2025. Mayor Keller does so despite the fact that an Albuquerque Journal poll found that Keller has a 33% approval rating which in all likelihood is only getting worse.  A 2024 Citizens Satisfaction Survey found that 63% of residence are concerned over the direction the city is going and 61% disagree that City Government is responsive to Community needs with both survey results reflecting poor leadership of city resources by Mayor Keller. The links to review both polls are here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/2545820/mayor-kellers-job-approval-rating-sinks.html

https://www.cabq.gov/progress/documents/albuquerque-yearly-survey-2023.pdf

Albuquerque City Council President Dan Lewis after being elected to return to the City Council in 2021 also made it known to his supporters he has every intent to run for Mayor again in 2025. This explains his full frontal assault on Mayor Tim Keller and his agenda from day one on his return to the City Council.

The relations between Mayor Tim Keller and the more conservative majority city council have deteriorated because of the sure frustration the conservatives on the council have experienced in not being able to stop the Keller progressive agenda with overriding vetoes.  As a result, the city council is once again trying to get city voters to change our basic form of city government with charter amendments in order to carry out a personal vendetta against a Mayor they do not like and who they perceive as ineffective and unpopular.

Links to related blog articles are here:

Sanchez and Grout’s Power Grab Of Striping Mayor Of Executive Powers And Creating Council Appointed City Manager Not Vetted By Charter Review Task Force; A Failure Of Leadership, Not Of Government Continues To Plague City

Dan Lewis and Louie Sanchez Are The New “Twiddle Dee” and the “Twiddle Dum” of Albuquerque City Council; Their Agenda Of Obstruction Has Limited Success; Keller and Medina Push Back; Expect More Antics

On May 8, the New Mexico Supreme Court announced changes to the state’s criminal pretrial detention system that will keep more defendants  in jail before their trial.  According to the new order which took effect immediately, defendants awaiting trial will now be held in jail if they are accused of a new crime while out on conditions of release if the charge falls into certain categories. They will remain in jail at least until the judge handling the original case considers whether they should stay in jail pending trial.

Those defendants  already on pretrial release who are charged with a felony, or some misdemeanors, will be held in jail until a court decides whether to revoke or modify the conditions of their release. Chief Justice David K. Thomson made the announcement to promote public safety. The order requires courts to reconsider its release conditions for defendants arrested for a new crime while awaiting trial for a previous charge.

Misdemeanor charges subject the new pretrial detention ruling guidance include:

• Driving while intoxicated
• Negligent use of a firearm
• Aggravated battery
• Stalking
• Domestic violence charges, including battery against a household member

Another revision prevents district courts to use results from what is known as the  Public Safety Assessment Tool. That risk assessment instrument looks at the likelihood a person is rearrested or fails to appear in court if released.

Additionally, when someone awaiting trial violates their conditions of release, such as  contacting someone they shouldn’t or having a gun when they shouldn’t, judges must consider changing those release conditions. Karl Reifsteck, deputy director of the Administrative Office of the Courts said this of the changes:

“These rules are aimed at making sure we’re taking a really close look – our judges, and prosecutors and defense attorneys – are taking a close look at those defendants.  … Zoom in on that small portion of folks who are being rearrested and really take a close look at them.” 

Reifsteck said the New Mexico  Supreme Court looked at certain data, including a UNM study that showed 18% of people accused of crimes were arrested again before trial. That was in Bernalillo County over four years. Reifsteck said this:

“There’s this slice of folks we really need to focus on and see how we can really promote public safety in regards to that group. … The Supreme Court feels strongly that in every single instance, this needs a close examination by our judges, by our prosecutors, by our defense attorneys.” 

Reifsteck added there have been instances where people were released a second time after picking up a new charge.

According to the revisions, a judge must also consider whether to modify  a criminal defendant’s pretrial release when they have broken their original conditions, such as missing curfew.  According to a release from the state Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC):

“If a court determines no changes are necessary, it must issue an order explaining the decision. Under previous rules, such a review of pretrial conditions was discretionary.”

The new, revised Supreme Court rule is very similar in scope to Senate Bill 271, which became law this past session.

REACTION TO REVISIONS

AOC Deputy Director Karl Reifsteck said the changes will help protect communities “while honoring the constitutional rights of people accused of a crime.”  AOC Director Artie Pepin said the revisions ensure that courts from the smallest towns to metro areas follow the same procedures when someone is arrested while on pretrial release. Pepin said this:

“The rules set short deadlines for hearings and issuing orders after courts consider whether to revoke or change the conditions under which a defendant was initially released to await trial.”

Chief Public Defender Ben Baur, with the Law Offices of the Public Defender, said this in  a statement:

“As with any rule change, like the one announced today, we have to wait to see how it works in the courtroom. We will closely watch for its impact on our clients and our workload.”

UNM researcher Paul Guerin said it’s too early to tell how the Supreme Court rule change will play out and he said this:

“It seems to make sense, on the face of it, as a citizen.”

Guerin said many of the people who would fall under this rule would already be held anyway in the current system. He added, “What we do know is rebuttable presumptions don’t work, so this is a lesser to that.”

Mayor Tim Keller for his part said this in reaction to the new Supreme Court revised rule:

“We all know the challenges we’ve had concerning this revolving door or rearrest problem. Today, I’m grateful for our Supreme Court because they have made a very common sense but specific change. … It’s an elegant, simple, legal solution and it’s something that we’re very, very much appreciative to.”.”

APD  Chief Harold Medina said this about the rule change: .

“It does assist us with our revolving door. … And honestly, it assists our judicial officials in making sure that they’re well in tune, and they get to weigh in on decisions they’ve made in the past.”

CONTENSIOUS ISSUE

Pretrial detention and pretrial release have been a major source of contention since  the passage of a 2016 constitutional amendment passed by voters that  did away with a “money-based”  bail bond system for getting out of jail while awaiting trial. Since passage of the constitutional amendment,  elected officials and candidates running for office and  law enforcement have attributed rising crime rates to a “broken criminal justice system”  and  to the bail bond reform changes.

Attorney General Raúl Torrez, the former Bernalillo County district attorney, has been one of the most outspoken critics.  Since being elected first as District Attorney Torrez has repeatedly said our criminal justice system is broken and has called for New Mexico courts to mirror those at the federal level, which uses  rebuttable presumption where Defendants charged with a serious violent crime must prove they are not a danger to the public and can be released. It shifts the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defense.

A bill adopting rebuttable presumption in the state’s judicial system has failed to pass the New Mexico Legislature during the past 4 legislative sessions. This past session, Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham pushed for the bill and, after it and other crime bills failed, she announced a special session, which is now scheduled for July.

Studies conducted by researchers at the University of New Mexico have found that the majority, or 82%, of people on pretrial release do not commit new crimes. No studies have been released publicly that have found otherwise.

Supporters and advocates of rebuttable presumption argue that it prevents  a large amount of crime with minimal impact on civil liberties. However, a 2021 study by UNM researcher Paul Guerin and others at UNM’s Institute for Social Research found that rebuttable presumption requires judges to “regard large classes of defendants as dangerous by default, rather than demanding that prosecutors prove this individually.”

Researchers found that rebuttable presumption and pretrial detentions do not reduce crime  because a small fraction of crime is committed by pretrial defendants  and because presumptions detain many defendants for each crime they prevent.  The researchers emphasized that the findings should not be taken “as an endorsement” of the current system, but in data comparison found that presumptions “would not add accuracy to the system.” “That does not mean that the system could not be reformed in other ways,” according to the findings.

Links to quoted and relied upon news sources are here:

https://www.koat.com/article/new-pretrial-detention-rules-new-mexico/60737273

https://www.kob.com/new-mexico/new-mexico-supreme-court-announces-change-to-pretrial-system/

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/new-mexico-supreme-court-changes-rules-on-pretrial-release/article_c99defce-0d72-11ef-a6e4-c37c010dbc02.

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

It was almost a year ago on May 22, 2023 that the New Mexico Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion providing guidance to district courts in deciding pretrial detention requests from prosecutors. The justices clarified the analysis that courts should follow in determining whether legal requirements have been met for a person charged with a felony to be held in jail while awaiting trial.

Under state law, a felony defendant may be detained if prosecutors file a written motion and prove to a district court that the charged person is dangerous and that “no release conditions will reasonably protect the safety of any other person or the community.”  The New Mexico  Supreme Court’s opinion provided  the legal reasoning for the  order issued by the justices in February that reversed a  District Court Judge decision denying  of a Motion for Pretrial Detention of Defendant. The justices held that the district court abused its discretion in denying the prosecution’s detention request and that the District Court followed the wrong analytical framework in making its determination.

Justice Briana H. Zamora wrote on behalf of the Supreme Court as follows:

“In this case, ample evidence showed that the Defendant [Anderson] was unlikely to comply with release conditions and that the public would be put at significant risk should he fail to comply with release conditions.  …

District courts must undertake a two-prong analysis in pretrial detention decision-making: The first is determining whether the defendant is dangerous, and the second prong is whether the state has proven there are no conditions or restrictions that can be imposed on a defendant – if released – to reasonably protect the public.

In analyzing both prongs, district courts must consider a range of factors outlined in a rule of criminal procedure governing pretrial detention (Rule 5-409). Those factors include the “nature and circumstances” of the charged crime, the defendant’s history, and the “nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the defendant’s release. … All factors are relevant to both prongs because a defendant’s dangerousness is not an entirely separate consideration from whether release conditions can reasonably protect the safety of the public; rather, the nature of the defendant’s dangerousness informs whether the public can be kept reasonably safe from that danger by the imposition of release conditions.

Thus, if a district court applies the Rule 5-409 factors and determines that a defendant is dangerous, it should not cordon off those facts that it considered in the dangerousness analysis and limit itself solely to the evidence that it did not yet consider in order to rule on release conditions.  District courts should take a “holistic, commonsense approach” in the analysis about possible release conditions.”

This second prong of the pretrial detention analysis, like the first prong of dangerousness, must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. However, the State must only prove that no release conditions can reasonably protect the public, not that no release conditions can possibly protect the public. … As part of its analysis, the district court must consider not only whether a defendant is likely to comply with release conditions but also the likely consequences to any person or the community should a defendant fail to comply”

That additional inquiry is related to, and must be viewed in light of, the magnitude of a defendant’s dangerousness. … For example, a defendant with a history of violent crimes who stands accused of a new violent crime may pose a significant and unjustifiable risk to the safety of any person or the community if the defendant fails to comply with release conditions.”

The Supreme Court made clear and emphasized that District Courts cannot “rely solely on the charged offense to order a defendant’s detention.” A district court “must always conduct a totality of the circumstances analysis in reaching a decision” on a motion for the pretrial detention of a felony defendant.

PRETRIAL DETENTION AND THE PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT TOOL

There has in the past been intense debate over pretrial detention and what is known as the Public Safety Assessment Tool.  When a criminal defendant is arrested and in jail, a prosecutor must file a Motion to Detain the defendant in custody until trial with no bail. After a prosecutor files a Motion to Detain, the Public Safety Assessment Tool assigns a recommended level of monitoring for the court to consider under pretrial services should the court decide to release a defendant pending trial, including house arrest and ankle bracelet monitoring.  An evidentiary hearing is held where the prosecutor has the burden of proof to show that the defendant poses an immediate threat and risk to the public and that there are no reasonable conditions of release to protect the public.

It was in 2023 that the District Court’s reliance the Public Safety Assessment Tool came under severe scrutiny and criticism by prosecutors, law enforcement and elected officials, including Governor Mitchell Lujan Grisham and New Mexico legislators, saying violent criminals were being release pending trial and committing crimes when they should have been in jail. The Public Safety Assessment Tool was attacked by critics when it recommended releasing a defendant charged with a violent crime with critics arguing that its recommendation of release was mandatory and not discretionary by the courts.

Pretrial detention legislation was introduced in the 2023 legislative session that would have mandated that a defendant simply charged with a violent crime be presumed violent and jailed until trial. The legislation failed and did not make it out of a single legislature committee. Critics argued successfully that the presumption of being violent mandating detention until trial is contrary to the constitutional right of due process of law and the presumption of being innocent until proven guilty.

On April 20, 2023  the Second Judicial District Court removed from the Public Safety Assessment Tool the categories of “Detention” and “Released on Own Recognizance” (ROR) which are on the opposite end of the Public Assessment Tool.  Second Judicial Chief Judge Marie Ward said inclusion of the two categories at the far ends of the Public Safety Assessment tool is not viewed as “best practices” but were added as a compromise at the request of one of the stakeholders on the  Bernalillo County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council.

District Judge Ward said, just like before the changes were made, a judge must consider evidence presented by the prosecutors and the defense attorneys to determine whether someone poses and immediate danger to the public and whether there are any conditions of release that could ensure the safety of the community. If a judge determines the person can be released, then the Public Safety Assessment gives them guidance on what level of supervision the defendant should be on.

Judge Ward described the changes as follows:

“What the [Public Assessment Tool] really tells us is, not this defendant, but a defendant in similarly situated circumstances … how likely were they to re-offend. … More evidence and argument can come in regarding this individual and other risk factors. … These modifications are only intended to clarify the misconceptions that have been out there that the assessment somehow dictates whether someone is released or not. … That’s not the case. It’s always the judge making a decision, and its always been that way.”

FINAL COMMENTARY

A negative perception of the courts is created when judges release violent felons and not holding them for trial without bond and simply not using their common sense.  It’s common knowledge that Judges are concerned about their disqualification rates, appeals and reversals and how they are perceived by the Judicial Performance Evaluation Commission.

Repeatedly, and especially during election years, it is very common for elected officials and candidates for office to proclaim that our criminal justice is broken and that the courts have become a revolving door for violent criminals. It’s a ploy that undercuts the very integrity of the courts, with nefarious politicians knowing full well individual judges are strictly prohibited from discussing in public pending cases under penalty of being removed from office.  The criminal justice system in this country and this state has never been perfect, nor will it ever be, but it is not broken. The criminal justice system does have its flaws and a number of inequities, but to say that it is a broken system is just plain ignorance or political opportunism at its worst.

There is little doubt that the New Mexico Supreme Court has become increasingly sensitive to the perceptions and demands of the general public that violent criminals, especially those charge with murder, need to be held in custody pending trial. What is also clear is that the Supreme Court wants the lower courts use their common sense and use a holistic and analytical approach to make their decisions to protect the general public from the most violent offenders. Now the public must wait and see how much common sense the courts in fact have.

The link to a related Dinelli blog article is here:

New Mexico Supreme Court Opinion Provides Guidance About Pretrial Detention; Holistic, Commonsense Approach Called For By Supreme Court